Pedagogical giftedness as a key prerequisite for efficient modern educational system
- Авторлар: Mazilov V.A.1, Slepko Y.N.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky
- Шығарылым: Том 23, № 1 (2019)
- Беттер: 37-49
- Бөлім: Pedagogical Psychology
- ##submission.dateSubmitted##: 22.05.2025
- ##submission.dateAccepted##: 22.05.2025
- ##submission.datePublished##: 15.03.2019
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/1991-9468/article/view/293011
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.094.023.201901.037-049
- ID: 293011
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
Introduction. The paper represents the analysis of the ability to teach within the context of the study of the phenomenon of giftedness and psychological structure of a teacher’s professional activities. The objective of the paper is to analyze key areas of the development of the concept of teacher giftedness. This approach allows to describe the basic qualities of the efficient pedagogical activity at the stage of training teachers at higher school.
Materials and Methods. Description of key areas of the concept of pedagogical giftedness is based on the ability theory, proposed by V. D. Shadrikov. At the same time, modeling processes of goal-oriented development of pedagogical giftedness is based on a set of modern research psychological methods of structuralfunctional analysis allowing for prediction of properties of the pedagogical system of a teacher, which has such characteristics as varying degrees of success. Organizational methods (first of all, comparative) open up possibilities for assessing the effectiveness of giftedness-in-training development at different stages of teacher training – pre-university, undergraduate and post-graduate. The choice of empirical methods is substantiated by the results of theoretically modeling the structure and ways of development of pedagogical giftedness at the stage of professional self-determination at school, under conditions of educational and independent professional activity. Out of interpretative methods, the most significant (in the context of planned results) are genetic, structural and functional methods.
Results. Based on the analysis of the theory of abilities, taking into account the progress in the activitybased approach, a new understanding of the object of psychological sciences as the inner personal world, the methodological validity of the concept of goal-oriented development of pedagogical gift under conditions of teacher training is substantiated. The results obtained make it possible to get a fresh look at the problem of the teacher’s professionally valuable qualities and translate its solution from analytical to systemic research methodology. In the concept proposed by the authors first time ever, the phenomenon of giftedness is considered within the context of its formation in teacher college student, while the subject of the bulk of contemporary research is the object of pedagogical influence.
Discussion and Conclusion. The practical application of the study results can significantly modernize the process of teacher training in pedagogical colleges and universities. They will be useful for the teaching staff of pedagogical universities, secondary vocational education institutions, and departments of continuing education.
Негізгі сөздер
Авторлар туралы
Vladimir Mazilov
Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: v.mazilov@yspu.org
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0646-6461
Scopus Author ID: 13004734300
ResearcherId: F-9746-201
Head of the Chair of General and Social Psychology, Dr.Sci (Psychology), Professor
Ресей, 108/1 Respublikanskaya St., Yaroslavl 150000Yuriy Slepko
Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky
Email: slepko@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6768-4652
Scopus Author ID: 56111886000
Dean of the Pedagogical Faculty, Ph.D. (Psychology), Associate Professor
Ресей, 108/1 Respublikanskaya St., Yaroslavl 150000Әдебиет тізімі
- Leites N.S. [B.M. Teplov and Psychology of Individual Differences]. Voprosy psikhologii = Issues of Psychology. 1982; (4):36-49. Available at: http://www.voppsy.ru/issues/1982/824/824036.htm (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Russ.)
- Leites N.S. [Early Manifestations of Giftedness]. Voprosy psikhilogii = Issues of Psychology. 1988; (4):98-107. Available at: http://voppsy.ru/issues/1988/884/884098.htm (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Russ.)
- Leites N.S. [The Breadth of Giftedness, Vocation, Fate]. Voprosy psikhologii = Issues of Psychology. 1996; (6):139-153. Available at: http://www.voppsy.ru/journals_all/issues/1996/966/966139.htm (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Russ.)
- Dyachenko O.M. [The Problem of Individual Differences in the Intellectual Development of the Child]. Voprosy psikhologii = Issues of Psychology. 1997; (4):138-146. Available at: http://www.voppsy.ru/issues/1997/974/974138.htm (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Russ.)
- Lubart T.I., Holling H., Ushakov D.V. Introduction to the Special Issue «Intelligence, Creativity and Giftedness». Learning and Individual Differences. 2016; 52:120-128.
- Kholodnaya М.А. Intelligence, Creativity, Learning Capability: Resource Approach (on Development of V.N. Druzhinin’s Ideas). Psykhologicheskiy zhurnal = Psychological Journal. 2015; 36(5):5-14. Available at: http://www.ipras.ru/cntnt/rus/institut_p/psihologic/vypuski_zh/n2015-2/n5-2015-soderjanie.html (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
- De Bono E. The Mechanism of Mind. London: Penguin; 1990. Available at: https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/110/1108442/the-mechanism-of-mind/9781785040085.html (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Eng.)
- Hong E., Milgram R.M. Preventing Talent Loss. New York: Routledge; 2008. (In Eng.)
- Rothenbusch S., Zettler I., Voss T., Lösch T., Trautwein U. Exploring Reference Group Effects on Teachers’ Nominations of Gifted Students. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2016; 108(6):883-897. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1110334 (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Eng.)
- Raven J. The Raven’s Progressive Matrices: Change and Stability over Culture and Time. Cognitive Psychology. 2000; 41(1):1-48. (In Eng.) doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0735
- Gordon B. Test Review: Wechsler, D. The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, Third Edition (WPPSI-III). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. Canadian Journal of School Psychology. 2004; 19(1-2):205-220. (In Eng.) doi: 10.1177/082957350401900111
- Gurevich K.M. [Tests of Intelligence in Psychology]. Voprosy psikhologii = Issues of Psychology. 1980; (2):53-63. Available at: http://www.voppsy.ru/issues/1980/802/802053.htm (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Russ.)
- Eysenck H.J. The Structure and Measurement of Intelligence. Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag; 1979. Available at: https://www.springer.com/us/book/9783642670770 (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Eng.)
- Liepmann D., Beauducel A., Brocke B., Amthauer R. Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R (I-S-T 2000 R). 2., erweiterte und überarbeitete Auflage. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2007. (In German)
- Forman J. Using the Torrance Incubation Model of Teaching to Provide a Smorgasbord of Learning. Torrance Journal for Applied Creativity. 2016; 1:88-91. Available at: http://www.centerforgifted.org/TorranceJournal_V1.pdf (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Eng.)
- Benedek M., Neubauer A. Revisiting Mednick’s Model on Creativity-Related Differences in Associative Hierarchies. Evidence for a Common Path to Uncommon Thought. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 2013; 47(4):273-289. (In Eng.) doi: 10.1002/jocb.35
- Ivleva M.L., Inozemtsev V.A. [Trends and Prospects for Development of Empirical Studies of Giftedness in Modern Psychology]. Izvestiya Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta MAMI = News of Moscow State Technical University MAMI. 2015; 6(1):98-104. (In Russ.)
- Binet A. Les idées modernes sur les enfants. Paris: Ernest Flammarton Editeur; 1909. Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/rechercheseducations/880 (accessed 29.12.2018). (In French)
- Vialle W. “Termanal” Science? The Work of Lewis Terman Revisited. Roeper Review. 1994; (17):32-38. (In Eng.)
- Jolly J.L. Sidney P. Marland, Jr. (1914–1992). Gifted Child Today. 2009; 32(4):40-65. (In Eng.) doi: 10.1177/107621750903200411
- Coleman M.R., Gallagher Sh.A. Dr. James Gallagher: Pragmatist, Pioneer, Visionary. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 2015; 38(1):3-5. (In Eng.) doi: 10.1177/0162353214565551
- Matyushkin A.M. [The Concept of Creative Talent]. Voprosy psikhologii = Issues of Psychology. 1989; (6):29-33. Available at: http://voppsy.ru/issues/1989/896/896029.htm (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Russ.)
- Dyachenko O.M. [The Problem of the Development of Abilities: Before and after L. Vygotsky]. Voprosy psikhilogii = Issues of Psychology. 1996; (5):98-109. Available at: http://www.voppsy.ru/issues/1996/965/965098.htm (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Russ.)
- Babaeva J.D. Fundamental Principles of the Cultural-Activity Approach in the Psychology of Giftedness. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2013; 6(4):109-119. (In Eng.) doi: 10.11621/pir.2013.0409
- Kaplan S.N. Challenge vs. Differentiation. Why, What and How. Gifted Child Today. 2016; 39(2):114-115. (In Eng.) doi: 10.1177/1076217516628916
- Melik-Pashayev A.A. [About the Source of a Person’s Ability to Artistic Creativity]. Voprosy psikhilogii = Issues of Psychology. 1998; (1):76-82. Available at: http://www.voppsy.ru/issues/1998/981/981076.htm (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Russ.)
- Panov V.I., Khisambeyev Sh.R. Climate Change and the Ecological Psychology. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2011; 4:62-73. Available at: http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2011/05_2011_panov_khisambeev.pdf (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Eng.)
- Swiatek M.A., Lupkowski-Shoplik A., O’Donoghue C.C. Gender Differences in Above-Level Explore Scores of Gifted Third Through Sixth Graders. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2000; 92(4):718-723. (In Eng.) doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.718
- Guilford J.P. The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGrow-Hill; 1967. (In Eng.)
- Sternberg R.J. The Theory of Successful Intelligence. Review of General Psychology. 1999; 3(4): 292-316. (In Eng.) doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.3.4.292
- Sternberg R.J., Torff B., Grigorenko E.L. Teaching Triarchically Improves School Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1998; 90(3):1-11. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ576492 (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Eng.)
- Gardner H. Intelligence and its Inheritance: A Diversity of Views. In: T. Bouchard, P. Propping (eds.). Twins as a Tool of Behavioral Genetics. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1993. p. 85-108. Available at: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1994-98031-000 (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Eng.)
- MacDonald R., Byrne Ch., Carlton L. Creativity and Flow in Musical Composition: An Empirical Iinvestigation. Psychology of Music. 2006; 34(3):292-306. (In Eng.) doi: 10.1177/0305735606064838
- Achter J.A., Lubinski D., Benbow C.P., Eftekhari-Sanjani H. Assessing Vocational Preferences Among Gifted Adolescents Adds Incremental Validity to Abilities: A Discriminant Analysis of Educational Outcomes Over a 10-Year Interval. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1999; 91(4):777-786. (In Eng.) doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.777
- Schroth S. Teaching Children Creative Thinking and Problem Solving Skills: Strategies for Building Creativity through Classroom Instruction and Interventions. Torrance Journal for Applied Creativity. 2016; 1:21-27. Available at: https://www.centerforgifted.org/TorranceJournal_V1.pdf (accessed 29.12.2018). (In Eng.)
Қосымша файлдар
