Email this article On ways to improve the production regulations of criminal cases of private and private-public prosecution
- Authors: OVSYANNIKOV I.V.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Academy of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia
- Saratov State Law Academy
- Issue: Vol 6, No 2 (2022)
- Pages: 228-234
- Section: Процессуальное право
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2587-9340/article/view/303791
- ID: 303791
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The purpose of the article is, based on an analysis of the differences in the procedures for initiating criminal cases of private and private-public prosecution and proceedings on them, to show the existing contradictions in the legislative regulation of the proceedings, to outline ways to eliminate them. The study made it possible to state the existence of problems in the public procedure for initiating a case – the dependence of the victim-applicant on the will of law enforcement officials and the possibility of difficult-to-surmount obstacles for him in access to justice. The difference in the procedures for terminating criminal cases of the two categories under consideration in connection with the reconciliation of the parties and the shortcomings of the regulation of these procedures in the criminal procedure law are discussed. The draft law of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the transfer of private prosecution cases to the category of private-public prosecution cases is being studied. The advantages and disadvantages of this draft law, proposals for its improvement are formulated. Proposals have been developed to improve the criminal procedure law in terms of regulating the proceedings in criminal cases of private and private-public prosecution.
About the authors
Igor V. OVSYANNIKOV
Academy of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia; Saratov State Law Academy
Author for correspondence.
Email: ivover@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4226-5958
Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Chief Researcher of the Research Department, Scientific Center; ; Professor of Criminal Procedure Department
Russian Federation, 1 Sennaya St., Ryazan 390000, Russian Federation; 1 Volskaya St., Saratov 410056, Russian FederationReferences
- Petrukhin I. Publichnost’ i dispozitivnost’ v ugolovnom protsesse [Publicity and Dispositiveness in Criminal Procedure]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya [Russian Justice], 1999, no. 3, pp. 24-25. (In Russian).
- Moskalkova T.N. Problemy zashchity prav poterpevshikh v ramkakh ugolovnogo rassledovaniya [Issues of protection of victims’ rights in criminal investigation]. Byulleten’ Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Bulletin of the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation], 2019, no. 7, pp. 4-6. (In Russian).
- Koryakin A.L. Institut chastnogo obvineniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Institute of Private Prosecution in Criminal Proceedings. Cand. law sci. diss. abstr.]. Omsk, 2016, 23 p. (In Rus-sian).
- Ovsyannikov I.V. Osobennosti prekrashcheniya ugolovnogo dela chastnogo obvineniya v svyazi s primire-niyem storon [Features of termination of a criminal case of private prosecution due to reconciliation of the parties]. Sovremennoye pravo [Modern Law], 2021, no. 9, pp. 92-95. (In Russian).
- Ksendzov Y.Y. V poiske optimal’nogo poryadka razresheniya ugolovnykh del chastnogo obvineniya [In search of the optimal order of resolution of criminal cases of private prosecution]. Yuridicheskiye issledovaniya [Legal Studies], 2019, no. 7, pp. 44-57. doi: 10.25136/2409-7136.2019.7.30321. (In Russian).
- Oleynik V.V. Uchastiye poterpevshego v ugolovnom presledovanii: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Participa-tion of the victim in criminal prosecution. Cand. law sci. diss. abstr.]. Omsk, 2020, 23 p. (In Russian).
- Dikarev I.S. Vozbuzhdeniye ugolovnykh del chastnogo i chastno-publichnogo obvineniya o prestupleniyakh, sovershennykh litsami, dannyye o kotorykh neizvestny [Initiation of criminal cases of private and private-public prosecution of crimes committed by persons whose identity is unknown]. Mirovoy sud’ya [Justice of the Peace], 2010, no. 1, pp. 20-24. (In Russian).
Supplementary files
