Modern trends in further professional education of judges: Russian and foreign experience

Мұқаба


Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Introduction. Modern further professional judicial education has a direct impact on the institutional and personal parameters of judicial independence and has a public significance as a guarantee of a judge's competence during his long career. The relevance of the research consists in development and substantiation of theoretical and methodological foundations of further professional education of judges as an independent form of their continuing education. The aim of the article is to systematize Russian and foreign experience in the organization of judicial professional development, to fill in the need for a comprehensive solution of legal, organizational and educational issues of judicial re-training, to substantiate promising models of the educational process and educational practices of continuous training of judges.

Materials and Methods. The object of the study was further professional education of judges as a state-legal and educational institute. The comparative nature of the research, based on the study of modern domestic and foreign experience in organizing further education for judges, provided data that had not previously been analyzed in the Russian scholarly literature. On the basis of a comprehensive (interdisciplinary) approach, conclusions were obtained concerning both the issues of legal regulation of the procedure of further professional education of judges and issues of pedagogical nature. A systematic analysis of further professional education of judges predetermined the identification of specific features of teacher training, the nature of training programs, methods and technologies of training of judges. Sociological methods were used to formulate conclusions on the conditions of admissibility of the electronic educational process in the judicial classroom. The research drew on electronic resources that reveal organizational peculiarities and educational practices of national and foreign judicial schools. Results. Regularities determining the trends in the evolution of further professional education of judges in Russia and abroad have been determined and disclosed. Models of judicial schools operating in foreign states depending on their legal status, nature and types of educational processes were identified. The principles of organization of further professional education of judges, allowing to distinguish this type of education from traditional systems of higher legal education, were substantiated. Proposals for improving the legal and educational model of the Russian judicial school are formulated.

Discussion and Conclusion. The results of the study can be useful for the further development of the theory of specialized judicial education, the definition of the legal status of the Russian judicial school that performs the functions of continuing education of judges, as well as for improving the educational process, given the need for methodological diversity of further programs and methods of training of judges.

Авторлар туралы

Elena Burdina

The Russian State University of Justice

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: elenburdina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5431-7634
Scopus Author ID: 57202214784
ResearcherId: B-6469-2018

Head of the Chair of Organization of the Judiciary and Law Enforcement, Dr.Sci. (Law), Associate Professor

Ресей, Moscow

Sergey Alexandrov

Arbitration Court of the Republic of Mordovia

Email: s_v_aleksandrov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1692-5505

Chairman, Cand.Sci. (Law)

Ресей, Saransk

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Ignatyeva G.A. Andragogy of Semyon Grigoryevich Vershlovsky – a Social and Pedagogical Discovery for Adult Education in the XXI Century. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie. 2021;(1):4–8. Available at: https://spbappo. ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/НО_выпуск_35.pdf (accessed 02.04.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  2. Rimskaya O.N., Anokhov I.V., Kranbikhler V.S. Human Capital in Industry 4.0. Present and Future. The Economics of Science. 2021;7(4):275–289. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.22394/2410- 132X-2021-7-4-275-289
  3. Bermus A.G., Serikov V.V., Altynikova N.V. Content of Pedagogical Education in the Modern World: Meanings, Problems, Practices and Development Prospects. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics. 2021;18(4):667–691. doi: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-4-667-691
  4. Sukhareva M.A. Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of Continuous Education. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 21. Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obshchestvo). 2019;(2):16–27. Available at: http:// vestnik21msu.ru/articles/article/4582/# (accessed 02.04.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  5. Arkhipova L.B., Lapaeva V.V. [Professional Retraining and Advanced Training of Judges and Court Staff]. Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2007;(4):93–100. (In Russ.)
  6. Senyakin N.N., Balashova I.N. [Professional Training and Advanced Training of Judges: Commentary on Article 20.1 of the Law of the Russian Federation “On the Status of Judges in the Russian Fe- deration”]. Yurist. 2011;(19):11–16. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17042539 (accessed 02.04.2022). (In Russ.)
  7. Cherkashina I.L., Cherkashin V.A. Business Game as Mean of Professional Retraining of Judges. Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2013;(9):97–110. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21202051 (accessed 02.04.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  8. Abdulin R.S. Professional Personnel – the Basis of Legal System of Russia. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2010;(2):62–70. Available at: http://bukvoved.ru/anno/anno-02-2010.html#z8 (accessed 02.04.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  9. Kudryavtseva E.P. Ways of Courts Activity Optimization. Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2015;(4):58–70. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23732781 (accessed 02.04.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  10. Ershov V.V. [Theoretical and Practical Problems of Specialized Education in the Russian Academy of Justice]. Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2009;(2):87–96. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12832429 (accessed 02.04.2022). (In Russ.)
  11. Ershov V.V. Specialized Training of Judicial Officials in the Russian Federation. Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2016;(1):5‒10. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2072-909X.2016.1.5
  12. Peysikov V.V. [Comparative Legal Analysis of International and Foreign Legislation in the Field of the Status of Judges]. Rossiyskiy sudya. 2004;(12):4–8. (In Russ.)
  13. Peysikov V.V. [Selection and Training of Judges: International and Foreign Legislation]. Mirovoy sudya. 2005;(1):9–13. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16924428 (accessed 02.04.2022). (In Russ.)
  14. Pukhnarevich S.I. Legal Forms of Further Professional Education for Judges: Concept, Types, Content. Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2020;(11):41–46. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072- 909X.2020.11.41-46
  15. González L., Cooper J. Judicial Training in Latin America: Study on the Practices of the Judicial Colleges. Judicial Education and Training. Journal of the International Organization for Judicial Training. 2018;(6):57–68. Available at: https://ncfsc-web.squiz.cloud/ data/assets/pdf_fiojt-journal-2018.pdf (accessed 02.04.2022).
  16. Xiaomin L. China’s Judges’ Education and Training Reform: Practice and Future Innovation. Judicial Education and Training. Journal of the International Organization for Judicial Training. 2018;(6):77–81. Available at: https://ncfsc-web.squiz.cloud/ data/assets/pdf_fiojt-journal-2018.pdf (accessed 02.04.2022).
  17. Richards D. Current Models of Judicial Training: An Updated Review of Initial and Continuous Training Models across Western Democratic Jurisdictions. Judicial Education and Training. Journal of the International Organization for Judicial Training. 2016;(5):41–52. Available at: https://ncfsc-web.squiz.cloud/ data/assets/ pdf_file/0017/6146/iojtjournal005.pdf (accessed 02.04.2022).
  18. Bakulina M.S. [Systemic and Integrated Approaches: Similarities and Differences]. Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V.P. Astafyev. 2011;(2):168–173. Available at: https://readera.org/sistemnyj-i-kompleksnyj-podhodyshodstvo-i-razlichie-144153180 (accessed 02.04.2022). (In Russ.)
  19. Lapshova E.S., Nikolaeva S.V. The Impact of Vocational Training or Retraining on Professional Activities of Older People. Vestnik of Samara State Technical University Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences. 2019;16(4):137–149. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-pps.2019.4.9
  20. Burdina E.V. Ethical Status of the Judge: Concept, Structure and Content. Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2019;(5):14–32. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2072-909X.2019.5.14-32
  21. Orlikhina N.E., Makhnovets S.N. Continuous Adult Education: Theoretical Approaches and Development Trends. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika i psikhologiya. 2018;(4):263–268. Available at: http://eprints.tversu.ru/8585 (accessed 02.04.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  22. Kuznetsova A.G., Yarovaya E.B. Designing a Teacher's Horizontal Career based on Additional Types of Pedagogical Activities and Professional Achievements: Russian and International Experiences. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics. 2021;18(1):174–193. doi: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-1-174-193
  23. Guthrie C., Rachlinski J., Wistrich A. Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases. Cornell Law Review. 2007;93(1). Available at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol93/iss1/9 (accessed 02.04.2022).
  24. Shalaginova K.S., Dekina E.V. Psychological and Pedagogical Aspects of Distance Education in a Pandemic: Based on the Materials of a Survey of Students – Future Psychologists. Psychological-Educational Studies. 2020;12(3):80–94. Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/psyedu_ru/2020/n3/Shalaginova_Dekina.shtml (accessed 02.04.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  25. Nugumanova L., Shaukhutdinova G., Yakovenko T. Digital Transformation of Supplementary Vocational Education in the Republic of Tatarstan. Professional Education in Russia and Abroad. 2021;(2):107–114. Available at: http://www.prof-obr42.ru/Archives/2(42)2021.pdf (accessed 02.04.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Бурдина Е.V., Александров С.V., 2022

Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қолжетімді Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Founded in 1996
Registry Entry: PI № FS 77-70142 of June 16, 2017

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».