Transient brachial plexopathy in adults and children: a literature review

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transient brachial plexopathy such as burner or stinger syndrome is a mild injury of the brachial plexus caused by forced movements of the arm or cervical spine, less often by direct impact of a traumatic factor in the supraclavicular region. It occurs mainly in athletes involved in contact sports. Clinically, transient brachial plexopathy is characterized by a sudden, sharp, stabbing pain that spreads from the neck to the fingertips and usually lasts from a few seconds to several minutes. Considering the lack of Russian literature on this disease, this article will be useful for trauma orthopedists, neurologists, sports doctors, trainers and rehabilitation specialists.

AIM: The aim of this paper was to review current data on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of transient brachial plexopathy and ways to maintain the ability of patients to participate in sports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Publications were searched in PubMed (MEDLINE) databases and Google from 1965 to 2024 using combinations of OR, AND operators and keywords such as “transient brachial plexopathy,” “stinger syndrome”, “burner syndrome”, “sports medicine”, “children.” A total of 49 papers were selected, 13 of which were published in the last 10 years.

RESULTS: The disease is diagnosed in 18.8%–65.0% of American football and rugby players. Stinger syndrome is reported in children when they fall from a chair and hit their shoulder on a table, when they hit a wall while running, accompanied by a sharp tilt of the head to the opposite side of the shoulder lesion. It is also reported in patients with shoulder hypermobility. Transient brachial plexopathy is caused by damage to the C5–C6 roots of the spinal cord or upper trunk of the brachial plexus. The pain syndrome usually lasts from a few seconds to a few minutes. It may be accompanied by paresthesia, numbness, and weakness of the upper extremity. Most symptoms of stinger syndrome (55.5%) develop during competition and resolve less than 24 hours after the game (63.8%). If the stinger syndrome resolves quickly, the patient does not require further evaluation or treatment. Indications for imaging include attacks lasting more than one hour with associated neck pain, symptoms topically associated with local nerve root damage, and recurrent attacks.

CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis and competent management of athletes with transient brachial plexopathy, as well as improved playing technique, may prevent or reduce recurrent attacks. It is important to remember that this disease can occur in both adults and children, even in everyday life.

About the authors

Olga E. Agranovich

H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery

Author for correspondence.
Email: olga_agranovich@yahoo.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6655-4108
SPIN-code: 4393-3694

MD, PhD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Svetlana I. Trofimova

H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery

Email: trofimova_sv@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2690-7842
SPIN-code: 5833-6770

MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Ekaterina V. Petrova

H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Children’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery

Email: pet_kitten@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1596-3358
SPIN-code: 2492-1260

MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Krivickas LS, Wilbourn AJ. Peripheral nerve injuries in athletes: a case series of over 200 injuries. Semin Neurol. 2000;20(2):225–232. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9832
  2. Kaiser R, Waldauf P, Ullas G, et al. Epidemiology, etiology, and types of severe adult brachial plexus injuries requiring surgical repair: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 2020;43(2):443–452. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-1009-2
  3. Clancy WG Jr, Brand RL, Bergfield JA. Upper trunk brachial plexus injuries in contact sports. Am J Sports Med. 1977;5(5):209–216. doi: 10.1177/036354657700500508
  4. Belviso I, Palermi S, Sacco AM, et al. Brachial plexus injuries in sport medicine: clinical evaluation, diagnostic approaches, treatment options, and rehabilitative interventions. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2020;5(2):22. doi: 10.3390/jfmk5020022
  5. Bowles DR, Canseco JA, Alexander TD, et al. The prevalence and management of stingers in college and professional collision athletes. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020;13(6):651–662. doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09665-5
  6. Feinberg JH. Burners and stingers. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2000;11(4):771–784. doi: 10.1016/S1047-9651(18)30101-3
  7. Carr JB II, Dines JS. Transient brachial plexopathy (stingers/burners). In: Hsu WK, Jenkins TJ, editors. Spinal conditions in the athlete: a clinical guide to evaluation, management and controversies. Springer; 2020. P. 109–123.
  8. Kasow DB, Curl WW. “Stingers” in adolescent athletes. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:711–716.
  9. Ahearn BM, Starr HM, Seiler JG. Traumatic brachial plexopathy in athletes: current concepts for diagnosis and management of stingers. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(18):677–684. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00746
  10. Kawasaki T, Ota C, Yoneda T, et al. Incidence of stingers in young rugby players. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(11):2809–2815. doi: 10.1177/0363546515597678
  11. Green J, Zuckerman SL, Dalton SL, et al. A 6-year surveillance study of “stingers” in NCAA American Football. Res Sports Med. 2017;25(1):26–36. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2016.1258642
  12. Zuckerman SL, Kerr ZY, Pierpoint L, et al. An 11-year analysis of peripheral nerve injuries in high school sports. Phys Sportsmed. 2019;47(2):167–173. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2018.1544453
  13. Robertson WC Jr, Eichman PL, Clancy WG. Upper trunk brachial plexopathy in football players. JAMA. 1979;241(14):1480–1482.
  14. Meyer SA, Schulte KR, Callaghan JJ, et al. Cervical spinal stenosis and stingers in collegiate football players. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(2):158–166. doi: 10.1177/036354659402200202
  15. Probst DT, Mackinnon SE, Prather H. Isolated axillary nerve injury in an elite high school american football player: a case report. Sports Health. 2019;11(6):550–553. doi: 10.1177/1941738119868478
  16. Kawasaki T, Maki N, Shimizu K, et al. Do stingers affect scapular kinematics in rugby players? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(12):e293–e299. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.009
  17. Charbonneau RM, McVeigh SA, Thompson K. Brachial neuropraxia in Canadian Atlantic University sport football players: what is the incidence of “stingers”? Clin J Sport Med. 2012;22(6):472–477. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3182699ed5
  18. Levitz CL, Reilly PJ, Torg JS. The pathomechanics of chronic, recurrent cervical nerve root neurapraxia. The chronic burner syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25(1):73–76. doi: 10.1177/036354659702500114
  19. Starr HM Jr, Anderson B, Courson R, et al. Brachial plexus injury: a descriptive study of American football. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2014;23(2):90–97. doi: 10.3113/jsoa.2014.0090
  20. Mäkelä JP, Ramstad R, Mattila V, et al. Brachial plexus lesions after backpack carriage in young adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:205–209. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000229338.29277.29
  21. Unlü MC, Kesmezacar H, Akgün I. Omuz laksitesi zemininde gelişen brakiyal pleksus nöropatisi (stinger sendromu): olgu sunumu [Brachial plexus neuropathy (stinger syndrome) occurring in a patient with shoulder laxity]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2007;41(1):74–79. (In Turkish)
  22. Quong WL, Hynes SL, Arneja JS. Pediatric stinger syndrome: acute brachial plexopathy after minor trauma. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(11):e560. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000543
  23. Johnson CS, Acebo JB, Aya K, et al. Transient brachial plexopathy after fixation of a clavicle fracture nonunion: a case report. JBJS Case Connect. 2020;10(2):e0434. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.CC.19.00434
  24. Larrota G, Gaona RC, Dicelis NS, et al. Acute brachial plexopathy secondary to surgical management of an atrophic nonunion of a clavicle fracture. Trauma Case Rep. 2024;51:101025. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2024.101025
  25. Poindexter DP, Johnson EW. Football shoulder and neck injury: a study of the “stinger”. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984;65(10):601–602.
  26. Markey KL, Di Benedetto M, Curl WW. Upper trunk brachial plexopathy. The stinger syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(5):650–655. doi: 10.1177/036354659302100503
  27. Cantu RC. Stingers, transient quadriplegia, and cervical spinal stenosis: return to play criteria. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29(7):S233–S235. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199707001-00005
  28. Cantu RC, Li YM, Abdulhamid M, et al. Return to play after cervical spine injury in sports. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013;12(1):14–17. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31827dc1fb
  29. Torg JS, Pavlov H, Genuario SE, et al. Neurapraxia of the cervical spinal cord with transient quadriplegia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(9):1354–1370.
  30. Kelly JD 4th, Aliquo D, Sitler MR, et al. Association of burners with cervical canal and foraminal stenosis. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(2):214–217. doi: 10.1177/03635465000280021201
  31. Albright JP, Van Gilder J, El-Khoury G, et al. Head and neck injuries in sports. In: Scott N.W., Nisonson B. Principles of sports medicine. Baltimore/London: Williams & Wilkins, 1984. P. 40–86.
  32. Chrisman OD, Snook GA, Stanitis JM, et al. Lateral-flexion neck injuries in athletic competition. JAMA. 1965;192:613–615. doi: 10.1001/jama.1965.03080200031009
  33. Bateman JE. Nerve injuries about the shoulder in sports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967;49(4):785–792.
  34. Shannon B, Klimkiewicz JJ. Cervical burners in the athlete. Clin Sports Med. 2002;21(1):29–35. doi: 10.1016/s0278-5919(03)00055-3
  35. Aval SM, Durand P Jr, Shankwiler JA. Neurovascular injuries to the athlete’s shoulder: Part I. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(4):249–256. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200704000-00008
  36. Thomas BE, McCullen GM, Yuan HA. Cervical spine injuries in football players. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999;7(5):338–347. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199909000-00006
  37. Michiels S, Van de Heyning P, Truijen S, et al. Diagnostic value of clinical cervical spine tests in patients with cervicogenic somatic tinnitus. Phys Ther. 2015;95(11):1529–1535. doi: 10.2522/ptj.201
  38. Cantu RV, Cantu RC. Current thinking: return to play and transient quadriplegia. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2005;4(1):27–32. doi: 10.1007/s11932-005-0027-3
  39. Concannon LG, Harrast MA, Herring SA. Radiating upper limb pain in the contact sport athlete: an update on transient quadriparesis and stingers. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2012;11(1):28–34. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e318240dc3f
  40. Vaccaro AR, Klein GR, Ciccoti M, et al. Return to play criteria for the athlete with cervical spine injuries resulting in stinger and transient quadriplegia/paresis. Spine J. 2002;2(5):351–356. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00202-4
  41. Speer KP, Bassett FH 3rd. The prolonged burner syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(6):591–594. doi: 10.1177/036354659001800606
  42. Gorden JA, Straub SJ, Swanik CB, et al. Effects of football collars on cervical hyperextension and lateral flexion. J Athl Train. 2003;38(3):209–215.
  43. Hovis WD, Limbird TJ. An evaluation of cervical orthoses in limiting hyperextension and lateral flexion in football. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;26(7):872–876.
  44. Stuber K. Cervical collars and braces in athletic brachial plexus injury and excessive cervical motion prevention: a review of the literature. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005;49(3):216–222.
  45. Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR. Injuries and abnormalities of the cervical spine and return to play criteria. Clin Sports Med. 2012;31(3):499–508. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2012.03.005
  46. Hakkaku T, Nakazato K, Koyama K, et al. Cervical Intervertebral disc degeneration and low cervical extension independently associated with a history of stinger syndrome. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(11):2325967117735830. doi: 10.1177/2325967117735830
  47. Greenberg J, Leung D, Kendall J. Predicting chronic stinger syndrome using the mean subaxial space available for the cord index. Sports Health. 2011;3(3):264–267. doi: 10.1177/1941738111403866
  48. Odor JM, Watkins RG, Dillin WH, et al. Incidence of cervical spinal stenosis in professional and rookie football players. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(5):507–509. doi: 10.1177/036354659001800510
  49. Weinstein SM. Assessment and rehabilitation of the athlete with a “stinger”. A model for the management of noncatastrophic athletic cervical spine injury. Clin Sports Med. 1998;17(1):127–135. doi: 10.1016/s0278-5919(05)70067-3

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Эко-Вектор

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07
 


Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».