Reproductive “Tomorrow” Begins Today
- Authors: Mochalova M.N.1, Erofeeva L.G.1, Erofeev B.B.2, Mozgovaya A.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Chita State Medical Academy
- Olovyanninskaya Central District Hospital
- Issue: Vol 74, No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 90-97
- Section: Case report
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/jowd/article/view/296141
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD653382
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AHTIZR
- ID: 296141
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abortion is one of the most significant medical and social factors that have a negative impact on women’s reproductive health and cause a decrease in fertility and an increase in reproductive loss, maternal mortality, and gynecological morbidity, thus exacerbating the challenging demographic situation.
AIM: The aim of this study was to draw up a medical and social portrait of a woman having an abortion and to identify factors that limit the birth of children for women and men.
METHODS: We conducted a medical and sociological survey using the questionnaire method in Google Forms for three groups of the Chita population. The main group (Group 1) consisted of 470 women aged 18 to 35 years who had not had an abortion. The comparison group (Group 2) included 75 women who had had one or more abortions in the past at the age of 15 to 46 years. Group 3 comprised 137 men aged 17 to 49 years. Statistical data processing was performed in the IBM SPSS Statistics 27.0.1 program. The χ2 Pearson criterion was used in the analysis of the qualitative feature of the study groups. The values were considered significant at p < 0.05.
RESULTS: More than half of the respondents in Group 1 were out of wedlock, so were a third of those who had an abortion in Group 2. Men in Group 3 tended to lack marriage. Prior to termination of pregnancy, the predominant use of barrier contraceptives was noted in Groups 2 and 3. The majority of respondents in all the study groups were informed about the consequences of abortion. The most common method of choosing termination of pregnancy was medication. In most cases, women were given a “week of silence” to think about a decision. Half of the respondents felt regret after termination of their pregnancy. Dissatisfaction with the procedure was noted by 38 patients. The leading factors in favor of termination of pregnancy in the study groups were as follows: unwillingness to have a child, poor financial support, and a difficult life situation. The presence of childfree individuals was revealed, the main reason for which is their dislike of children.
CONCLUSION: The main factors that limit the birth of children are the present unwillingness to have children (“delayed pregnancy”), low income and poor housing conditions, financial strain, as well as the presence of the childfree subculture. The provision of a “silence period” for women before abortion had no effect on the revision of reproductive plans.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Marina N. Mochalova
Chita State Medical Academy
Email: marina.mochalova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5941-0181
SPIN-code: 1068-3570
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor
Russian Federation, ChitaLyudmila G. Erofeeva
Chita State Medical Academy
Author for correspondence.
Email: erofeeva.liud@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5224-1496
SPIN-code: 4506-9016
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor
Russian Federation, ChitaBoris B. Erofeev
Olovyanninskaya Central District Hospital
Email: boriserof@gmail.com
SPIN-code: 4602-6128
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, YasnogorskAnna S. Mozgovaya
Chita State Medical Academy
Email: salli.hill.2019@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Chita
References
- Lezhenina SV, Denisova TG, Pikushkin VV, et al. Abortion as a medical and social problem. Healthcare of Chuvashia. 2021;(2):49–60. EDN: CPEKTU doi: 10.25589/GIDUV.2021.16.81.009
- Bantieva MN, Manoshkina EM, Sokolovskaya TA. Medical and social significance of abortion in the Russian Federation. Academy of medicine and sports. 2020;1(1):5–9. EDN: IZSBQJ doi: 10.15829/2712-7567-2020-1-5-9
- Berezina DK, Trofimova KV, Ivanova SN. Termination of pregnancy as a medical and social problem of women of reproductive age. Young scientist. 2019;(49):240–242. (In Russ). EDN: ZOBKBF
- Bolkina YS, Radynova SB. Modern medico-social aspects of abortion. Diary of Science. 2021;(7). (In Russ.)
- Spiridenko GY, Petrov YA, Palieva NV. Artificial termination of pregnancy – a burning problem of medicine and society. Pulse. 2021;23(12):28–34. EDN: AAEEUF doi: 10.26787/nydha-2686-6838-2021-23-12-28-34
- Savchenko NA. Attitude to artificial abortion in Russia: XX – beginning of XXI century. In: Modernization of the Russian society and education: new economic guidelines, management strategies, issues of law enforcement and training: materials of the XXII national scientific conference (with international participation). Taganrog; 2021. P. 404–408. (In Russ.)
- World Health Organization. Strategy in the field of reproductive health. (In Russ.) [cited 2024 Dec 12] Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/68754/4/WHO_RHR_04.8_rus.pdf
- Smelov PA, editor. Healthcare in Russia 2021: statistical collection. Moscow: Rosstat; 2021. 171 p. (In Russ.)
- Abortion statistics by demographic, legal form, rate report and reasons [Internet]. (In Russ.) [cited 2024 Dec 12] Available from: https://www.sci-tech-today.com/stats/abortion-statistics/
- Russian State Statistical Service (Rosstat) [Internet]. (In Russ.) [cited 2024 Dec 12] Available from: https://rosstat.gov.ru/search?q=прерывание+беременности+в+забайкальском+крае&date_from=01.01.2017&content=on&date_to=30.11.2023&search_by=all&sort=relevance
- Kosareva AA, Okhremenko ZV. Modern aspects of artificial termination of pregnancy. Bulletin of the Medical Institute REAVIZ: Rehabilitation, Doctor, and Health. 2022;(2):287–289 (In Russ.)
- Sakevich VI, Denisov BP. The latest trends in reproductive health and the problem of abortion in Russia. Sociological research. 2019;(11):140–151. EDN: YCHBGJ doi: 10.31857/S013216250007457-5
- Vartanova ML. The abortions in minors as a medical social problem. Problems of social hygiene, public health and history of medicine. 2022;30(4):580–586. EDN: JGMQYA doi: 10.32687/0869-866X-2022-30-4-580-586
- Alekhina AG, Petrov YA, Blesmanovich AE, et al. The impact of abortion on the reproductive capabilities of women. Health and education in the XXI century. 2019;21(1):15–19. EDN: LYSYXN doi: 10.26787/nydha-2226-7425-2019-21-1-15-19
- Petrov AY, Uzbekova LD, Sereda EV. Immediate and distant consequences of artificial termination of pregnancy. International Research Journal. 2022;(6-2):131–134. (In Russ.) EDN: FUUGIG doi: 10.23670/IRJ.2022.120.6.055
- Tkachenko LV, Gritsenko IA, Tikhaeva KY, et al. Abortion: reproductive choice or loss of reproduction? Medical Alphabet. 2021;(8):44–48. EDN: XGZXQM doi: 10.33667/2078-5631-2021-8-44-48
- Brynza NS, Suldin AM, Ivanova AD. Socio-hygienic characteristics of women who decided to terminate pregnancy through abortion. Medical science and education of the Urals. 2019;(1):117–122. EDN: VVFOAE
- Galkin SS, Mikheeva LY, editors. Families and children in Russia. 2021. Moscow; 2022. (In Russ.)
- Skobelina NA, Shelest MV. Factors influencing the practice of artificial termination of pregnancy. Sociodynamics. 2022;(3):22–32. EDN: KOHWYS doi: 10.25136/2409-7144.2022.3.37037
- Solodukhina DP, Mashoshina LO. Abortion as a medico-social problem in the representations of medical students. Pulse. 2023;25(5):31–35. EDN: HKCFVE doi: 10.26787/nydha-2686-6838-2023-25-5-31-35
