Features of the clinical course of endometriosis in papillomavirus infection
- Authors: Khanova A.M.1, Khachaturian A.R.1, Khusnutdinova T.A.1, Savicheva A.M.1, Yarmolinskaya M.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
- Issue: Vol 73, No 6 (2024)
- Pages: 172-181
- Section: Original study articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/jowd/article/view/281061
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD639963
- ID: 281061
Cite item
Abstract
Background: To date, the etiology and pathogenesis of endometriosis are still unclear and are determined by a number of factors (genetic, immunological and endocrine), including microbiological ones.
Aim: The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical course of endometriosis in papillomavirus infection.
Materials and methods: This retrospective analysis included 185 outpatient records of patients with genital endometriosis and comprised complaints, anamnesis data, objective examination, cytological and molecular biological examination results. All patients were divided into two study groups. Group 1 (main) consisted of patients with endometriosis and human papillomavirus (n = 56), and group 2 (comparison) included patients with endometriosis and no human papillomavirus (n = 129).
Results: The frequency of human papillomavirus detection among patients with endometriosis was 30.3 (95% confidence interval 24–38)%. The most frequent types detected were 31 (20%), 16 (18%), 18 (18%), 56 (16%), and 53 (13%). The conclusion of cervical cytological examination: in group 1 was the following 54/56 patients had negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM) and 2/56 patients had low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), all patients in group 2 had NILM. The average duration of endometriosis was 8.2 ± 5.0 years for patients in group 1 and 9.4 ± 5.9 years for patients in group 2 (p = 0.15). We found differences between the study groups with respect to the following parameters: the average age of sexual debut was 17.82 ± 1.47 years and 18.53 ± 1.43 years for groups 1 and 2, respectively. Dyspareunia occurred in 77 (95% confidence interval 63–87)% of women in Groups 1 and in 42 (95% confidence interval 33–51)% in groups 2 (p < 0.001). The average pain severity score according to the visual analogue scale was 6.7 ± 2.4 and 5.9 ± 2.8 points, respectively (p = 0.039). In group 1, impaired vaginal microbiocenosis was more common.
Conclusions: Human papillomavirus was detected in every third woman with endometriosis, most often in genotypes of high carcinogenic risk. Among the features of the clinical course of endometriosis in the presence of human papillomavirus, more pronounced pain syndrome and symptoms of dyspareunia were noted. In the group of women with human papillomavirus, impaired vaginal microbiocenosis was more often observed.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Aigul M. Khanova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Author for correspondence.
Email: musannifovna@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6438-5195
MD
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgArmine R. Khachaturian
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: armine2709@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2141-6307
SPIN-code: 2691-3910
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgTatiana A. Khusnutdinova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: husnutdinovat@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2742-2655
SPIN-code: 9533-9754
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAlevtina M. Savicheva
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: savitcheva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3870-5930
SPIN-code: 8007-2630
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgMaria I. Yarmolinskaya
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: m.yarmolinskaya@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6551-4147
SPIN-code: 3686-3605
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Bulun SE, Yilmaz BD, Sison C, et al. Endometriosis. Endocr Rev. 2019;40(4):1048–1079. doi: 10.1210/er.2018-00242
- Berg G, Rybakova D, Fischer D, et al. Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome. 2020;8(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0
- Shi N, Li N, Duan X, et al. Interaction between the gut microbiome and mucosal immune system. Mil Med Res. 2017;4:14. doi: 10.1186/s40779-017-0122-9
- Radzinskij VE, Savicheva AM. Vaginal biocenosis. Norm. Disorders. Recovery. Moscow: StatusPraesens; 2023. (In Russ.)
- Leonardi M, Hicks C, El-Assaad F, et al. Endometriosis and the microbiome: a systematic review. BJOG. 2020;127(2):239–249. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15916
- Oppelt P, Renner SP, Strick R, et al. Correlation of high-risk human papilloma viruses but not of herpes viruses or Chlamydia trachomatis with endometriosis lesions. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(6):1778–1786. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.061
- Heidarpour M, Derakhshan M, Derakhshan-Horeh M, et al. Prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus infection in women with ovarian endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43(1):135–139. doi: 10.1111/jog.13188
- Rocha RM, Souza RP, Gimenes F, et al. The high-risk human papillomavirus continuum along the female reproductive tract and its relationship to infertility and endometriosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(6):926–937. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.032
- Bruni L, Diaz M, Castellsagué X, et al. Cervical human papillomavirus prevalence in 5 continents: meta-analysis of 1 million women with normal cytological findings. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(12):1789–1799. doi: 10.1086/657321
- Moslehi Z, Derakhshan R, Chaichian S, et al. Correlation of high-risk human papilloma virus with deep endometriosis: a cross-sectional study. BioMed Res Int. 2023;2023:6793898. doi: 10.1155/2023/6793898
- Lloyd-Price J, Abu-Ali G, Huttenhower C. The healthy human microbiome. Genome Med. 2016;8(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0307-y
- Stefano GB, Fine R, Kream RM. Microbiome and health: ramifications of intelligent deception. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:2060–2062. doi: 10.12659/msm.910248
- Sobstyl A, Chałupnik A, Mertowska P, et al. How do microorganisms influence the development of endometriosis? participation of genital, intestinal and oral microbiota in metabolic regulation and immunopathogenesis of endometriosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(13):10920. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310920
- Salliss ME, Farland LV, Mahnert ND, et al. The role of gut and genital microbiota and the estrobolome in endometriosis, infertility and chronic pelvic pain. Hum Reprod. Update. 2021;28(1):92–131. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmab035
- Uzuner C, Mak J, El-Assaad F, et al. The bidirectional relationship between endometriosis and microbiome. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1110824. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1110824
- Coleman N, Birley HD, Renton AM, et al. Immunological events in regressing genital warts. Am J Clin Pathol. 1994;102(6):768–774. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/102.6.768
- Giuliano AR, Lee JH, Fulp W, et al. Incidence and clearance of genital human papillomavirus infection in men (HIM): a cohort study. Lancet. 2011;377(9769):932–940. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62342-2
- Di Paola M, Sani C, Clemente AM, et al. Characterization of cervico-vaginal microbiota in women developing persistent high-risk Human Papillomavirus infection. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09842-6
- Bowden SJ, Doulgeraki T, Bouras E, et al. Risk factors for human papillomavirus infection, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer: an umbrella review and follow-up Mendelian randomisation studies. BMC Med. 2023;21(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02965-w
- Park SY, Lee ES, Lee SR, et al. Vaginal microbiome is associated with vulvodynia, vulvar pain syndrome: a case-control study. Sex Med. 2021;9(2):100314. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100314
- Siqueira-Campos VM, de Deus MSC, Poli-Neto OB, et al. Current challenges in the management of chronic pelvic pain in women: from bench to bedside. Int J Womens Health. 2022;14:225–244. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S224891
- Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Endometriosis and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):591–598. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.031
- Triolo O, Laganà AS, Sturlese E. Chronic pelvic pain in endometriosis: an overview. J Clin Med Res. 2013;5(3):153–163. doi: 10.4021/jocmr1288w
- Lagomarsino VN, Kostic AD, Chiu IM. Mechanisms of microbial-neuronal interactions in pain and nociception. Neurobiol Pain. 2020;9:100056. doi: 10.1016/j.ynpai.2020.100056
- Jimenez N, Norton T, Diadala G, et al. Vaginal and rectal microbiome contribute to genital inflammation in chronic pelvic pain. BMC Med. 2024;22(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03500-1
Supplementary files
