Legal problems of resuming criminal proceedings due to new or newly discovered circumstances
- Authors: PERETYATKO N.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- Saratov State Academy of Law
- Issue: Vol 8, No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 130-139
- Section: Процессуальное право
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2587-9340/article/view/297381
- ID: 297381
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The relevance of the research topic is due to the existence of problems in the institution of reopening criminal proceedings due to new or newly discovered circumstances and the need to reform this area of legal relations. The goal is determined by the updating of unresolved issues of the institution of reopening criminal proceedings due to new or newly discovered circumstances. The objectives of the study are to determine the development trends of the institution under study, identify the legal contradictions that exist in it and develop proposals and recommendations for their elimination. The work used classical methods of legal research: analysis, synthesis, study of judicial practice, formal logic. Based on an analysis of the norms of criminal procedure law, decisions of higher courts and law enforcement practice, a conclusion was made about the need to reform the institution of reopening criminal proceedings in view of new or newly discovered circumstances. The conclusion is substantiated about the need to legislatively establish the terms for the prosecutor to conduct an inspection, the results of which serve to make a decision on the resumption of the relevant proceedings or on the refusal to do so. The need to reform the institution of resuming criminal proceedings and bringing the norms of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in line with their constitutional meaning has been proven by eliminating existing legal gaps through amending Chapter 49 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation.
About the authors
Natalya M. PERETYATKO
Saratov State Academy of Law
Author for correspondence.
Email: naperetyatko@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4156-4430
PhD (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Criminal Procedure Department
Russian Federation, 1 Vol’skaya St., Saratov, 410056, Russian FederationReferences
- Manova N.S. (2008). Resumption of a criminal case due to new or newly discovered circumstances: advantages and failures of legal regulation. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, no. 5, pp. 107-109. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/inmigr
- Arutyunyan A.A., Brusnitsyn L.V., Vasil’ev O.L. et al. (2016). Kurs ugolovnogo protsessa [Course in Criminal Procedure]. Moscow, Lomonosov Moscow State University Publ., 666 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wdxudn
- Zaytseva E.A. (2023). Reglamentatsiya vozobnovleniya proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu vvidu novykh ili vnov’ otkryvshikhsya obstoyatel’stv v Rossii i Belarusi [Regulations for the resumption of criminal proceedings due to new or newly discovered circumstances in Russia and Belarus]. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo Rossii i zarubezhnykh gosudarstv: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya» [Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Criminal Justice in Russia and Foreign Countries: Problems and Development Prospects”]. St. Petersburg, Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia Publ., pp. 63-67. https://elibrary.ru/tzpwdh
- Oksyuk T.L. (2007). Resumption of criminal proceedings due to new or newly discovered circumstances. Zakonnost = Legality, no. 10, pp. 6-11. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kxclrl
- Alekseeva T.M. (2023) Reopening of criminal case proceedings based on new and newly discovered circumstances: relevant problems on the example of a specific case. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo = Criminal Proceedings, no. 2, pp. 33-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4411-2023-2-33-37, https://elibrary.ru/fybehw
- Kolokolov N.A. (2011). Retsenziya na monografiyu V.A. Davydova «Vozobnovlenie ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva vvidu novykh ili vnov’ otkryvshikhsya obstoyatel'stv: teoriya i praktika ispravleniya sudebnykh oshibok» [Review of the monograph by V.A. Davydov “Resumption of criminal proceedings due to new or newly discovered circumstances: theory and practice of correcting judicial errors”]. Rossiyskiy sud’ya = Russian Judge, no. 9, pp. 27-29. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ojevin
- Kachalova O.V., Khromenkov I.R. (2023). Provision by the court of legal interests in the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings. Pravosudie = Justice, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 177-192. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37399/2686-9241.2023.1.177-192, https://elibrary.ru/ebvkyp
- Zavgorodnyaya A.A. (2023). Fair ratio of private and public interests and proportionality. Aktual’nye problemy gosudarstva i prava = Current Issues of the State and Law, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 471-483. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2023-7-4-471-483, https://elibrary.ru/viffud
- Churikova A.Yu., Manova N.S. (2022). The model of the prosecutor’s activity in criminal proceedings as a determinant of legal nihilism. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 226-237. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2022120417, https://elibrary.ru/rjcsxu
- Burmagin S.V. (2023). Features of evidence during the court’s consideration of complaints against the actions and decisions of officials conducting pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice], no. 7, pp. 42-48. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/htomvf
- Rossinskiy S.B. (2023). On the subject and limits of appeals to a court against actions (inactions) and decisions of the bodies of preliminary investigation and prosecution. Pravovoe gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika, no. 1 (71), pp. 29-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2023.1.5, https://elibrary.ru/algefn
Supplementary files
