The Development of a Reflective Language Learning Model: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Обложка

Цитировать

Полный текст

Аннотация

Background: Several language learning theories exist to explain the language learning process. Reflective learning is one of the models that has received attention and has been employed to explain language learning and teaching.

Purpose: The present study aimed to develop and validate a close-ended reflective language learning instrument to discover EFL learners’ reflective learning strategies while learning a language.

Method: Based on a comprehensive literature review, 358 concepts were extracted for reflective language learning. Then, experts’ opinions on reflective language learning were gathered, leading to the extraction of 50 general themes. After the experts’ approval, the researchers transformed the concepts into statements and constructed the final version of the questionnaire. In the next step, the initial version of the questionnaire was piloted with 100 participants, reducing the number of items to 47. Then, the piloted instrument was administered to a sample of 398 students. The obtained data were entered into SPSS and LISERL for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Principle Component Analysis (PCA) was employed to run an explanatory factor analysis. Varimax rotation was performed on the underlying construct of the 47-item questionnaire. The result was the removal of four items and forming a 43-item questionnaire. A six-factor model of second language learning encompassing twelve behavioral cognitive items, twelve behavioral evaluative items, six behavioral metacognitive items, six behavioral interactional items, four behavioral reflective journal items, and three behavioral retrospective items was obtained. Then, the researchers performed confirmatory factor analysis to verify the six factors. Finally, a reflective language learning model was developed.

Results: The results showed that the newly developed Reflective Language Learning Questionnaire (RLLQ) was valid and reliable. The model formulated based on the data gathered from the administration of RLLQ also enjoyed acceptable fitness indices.

Conclusion: The questionnaire could be used in future studies. Researchers interested in reflective language learning, language teachers intending to follow reflective practices in their classes, and syllabus designers believing that reflection promotes learning can employ RLLQ.   

Об авторах

S. Asshabi

Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

Автор, ответственный за переписку.
Email: s2asshabi@yahoo.co.uk

M. Rashtchi

Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch

Email: mojgan.rashtchi@gmail.com

M. Siyyari

Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

Email: siyyari@gmail.com

Список литературы

  1. Alt, D., Raichel, N., & Naamati-Schneider, L. (2022). Higher education students' reflective journal writing and lifelong learning skills: Insights from an exploratory sequential study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 707168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.707168
  2. Aryani, F., Rais, M., & Wirawan, H. (2017). Reflective learning model in improving student critical thinking skills. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), 19-23.
  3. Atkins, S., & Murphy, K. (1993). Reflection: A review of the literature. JAN, 18(8), 1188-1192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18081188.x
  4. Ayre, C., & Scally, A.J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development, 47 (1), 79-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
  5. Bell, H.L., Gibson, H.J., Tarrant, M.A., Perry III, L.G., & Stoner, L. (2014). Transformational learning through study abroad: US students' reflections on learning about sustainability in the South Pacific. Leisure Studies, 35(4), 389-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2014.962585
  6. Bingham, A.J., & Witkowsky, P. (2022). Deductive and inductive approaches to qualitative data analysis. In C. Vanover, P. Mihas, & J. Saldana (Eds.), Analyzing and interpreting qualitative data: After the interview (pp. 133-146). Sage.
  7. Black, P.E., & Plowright, D. (2010). A multi-dimensional model of reflective learning for professional development. Reflective Practice, 11(2), 245-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14623941003665810
  8. Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting reflection in learning: A model. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.). Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 18-40). Routledge.
  9. Bruno, A., & Dell'Aversana, G. (2017). Reflective practice for psychology students: The use of reflective journal feedback in higher education. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 16(2), 248-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716686288
  10. Cicmil, S., & Gaggiotti, H. (2018). Responsible forms of project management education: Theoretical plurality and reflective pedagogies.International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 208-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.005
  11. Colomer, J., Pallisera, M., Fullana, J., Burriel, M.P., & Fernández, R. (2013). Reflective learning in higher education: A comparative analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 364-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.204
  12. Cooke, S.D. (2013). Examining transcription, autonomy and reflective practice in language development. RELC Journal, 44(1), 75-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473271
  13. Coombe, C., & Davidson, P. (2015). Constructing questionnaires. In J.D. Brown & C. Coombe (Eds.). The Cambridge guide to research in language teaching and learning (pp. 217- 223). Cambridge University Press.
  14. Davys, A.M., & Beddoe, L. (2009). The reflective learning model: Supervision of social work students. Social Work Education, 28(8), 919-933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470902748662
  15. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A re-statement of the relation of reflective thinking to the education process. Heath & Co.
  16. Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  17. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research method in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
  18. Erdogan, F. (2019). Effect of cooperative learning supported by reflective thinking activities on students' critical thinking skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(80), 89-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.80.5
  19. Feng, J.B. (2016). Improving intercultural competence in the classroom: A reflective development model. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 27(1), 4-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08975930.2016.1172540
  20. Fuertes-Camacho, M.T., Dulsat-Ortiz, C., & Álvarez-Cánovas, I. (2021). Reflective practice in times of Covid-19: A tool to improve education for sustainable development in pre-service teacher training. Sustainability, 13(11), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116261
  21. Fullana, J., Pallisera, M., Colomer, J., Fernández Peña, R., & Pérez-Burriel, M. (2016). Reflective learning in higher education: A qualitative study on students' perceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), 1008-1022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.950563
  22. Gadsby, H. (2022). Fostering reflective practice in post graduate certificate in education students through the use of reflective journals. Developing a typology for reflection. Reflective Practice, 23(3), 357-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2028612
  23. Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further Education Unit.
  24. Gray, D.E. (2007). Facilitating management learning: Developing critical reflection through reflective tools. Management Learning, 38(5), 495-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507607083204
  25. Griggs, V., Holden, R., Lawless, A., & Rae, J. (2018). From reflective learning to reflective practice: Assessing transfer. Studies in Higher Education, 43(7), 1172-1183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1232382
  26. Grossman, R. (2008). Structures for facilitating student reflection. College Teaching, 57(1), 15-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.57.1.15-22
  27. Hussein, H. (2018). Examining the effects of reflective journals on students' growth mindset: A case study of tertiary level EFL students in the United Arab Emirates. IAFOR Journal of Education, 6(2), 33-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.6.2.03
  28. Jasper, M. (2013). Beginning reflective practice. Cengage Learning.
  29. Khellab, F., Demirel, Ö., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2022). Effect of teaching metacognitive reading strategies on reading comprehension of engineering students. Sage Open, 12(4), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221138069
  30. Kember, D., Leung, D.Y., Jones, A., Loke, A.Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C., Wong, F.K. Y., Wong, M., & Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 381-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713611442
  31. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning. Prentice-Hall.
  32. Kolb, D.A. (1994). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
  33. Kolb, A.Y., & Kolb, D.A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212.
  34. Kolb, A.Y., & Kolb, D.A. (2009). Experiential learning theory: A dynamic, holistic approach to management learning, education, and development. In S.J. Armstrong & C.V. Fukami (Eds,), The Sage handbook of management learning, education and development (pp. 42-65). Sage.
  35. Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018).Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125
  36. Loo, R., & Thorpe, K. (2002) Using reflective learning journals to improve individual and team performance. Team Performance Management, 8 (5/6), 134-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590210442258
  37. Marcos, J.J., Miguel, E.S., & Tillema, H. (2009). Teacher reflection on action: What is said (in research) and what is done (in teaching). Reflective Practice 10(2), 191-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940902786206
  38. Min, B., & Park, S. (2019). Development of a questionnaire to measure reflective attitude toward conversation. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 19(3), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2019.19.03.01
  39. Moon, J.A. (2004). A handbook of re ective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. Routledge Falmer.
  40. Morris, T.H. (2020). Experiential learning-A systematic review and revision of Kolb's model.Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064-1077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
  41. Ogbuanya, T.C., & Owodunni, A.S. (2015). Effects of reflective inquiry instructional technique on students' academic achievement and ability level in electronic work trade in technical colleges. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(7), 43-53.
  42. Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-Regulation in context. Routledge.
  43. Pallant, J. (2007). Survival guide: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
  44. Peltier, J.W., Hay, A., & Drago, W. (2005). The reflective learning continuum: Reflecting on reflection. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(3), 250-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/0148.4843-19970501-11
  45. Pena-Silva, R.A., Velasco-Castro, J.M., Matsingos, C., & Jaramillo-Rincon, S.X. (2022). Journaling as an effective tool to promote metacognition and enhance study methods in a pharmacology course, during and after the pandemic. The FASEB Journal, 36 (Suppl1),. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R4840
  46. Pietrzak, P. (2019). Scaffolding student self-reflection in translator training. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 14(3), 416-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.18029
  47. Ramsey, C. (2006).Introducing reflective learning. Thanet Press.
  48. Richards, J.C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and linguistics (3rd ed.). Pearson.
  49. Rogers, S.L., Priddis, L.E., Michels, N., Tieman, M., & Van Winkle, L.J. (2019). Applications of the reflective practice questionnaire in medical education. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1481-6
  50. Sabah, S., & Rashtchi, M. (2016). Critical thinking in personal narrative and reflective journal writings by in-service EFL teachers in Iran: Assessment of reflective writing. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 35(3), 157-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2016.3900
  51. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
  52. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
  53. Sellars, M. (2013). Reflective practice for teachers. Sage.
  54. Southcott, J., & Crawford, R. (2018). Building critically reflective practice in higher education students: Employing auto-ethnography and educational connoisseurship in assessment. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 95-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n5.7
  55. Tan, S.Y. (2021) Reflective learning? Understanding the student perspective in higher education, Educational Research, 63(2), 229-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2021.1917303
  56. Van der Sluis, H., Burden, P., & Huet, I. (2017). Retrospection and reflection: The emerging influence of an institutional professional recognition scheme on professional development and academic practice in a UK university. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(2), 126-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1273790
  57. Wallin, P., & Adawi, T. (2018) The reflective diary as a method for the formative assessment of self-regulated learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(4), 507-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1290585
  58. Wedell, M. (2022). Innovation in ELT revisited. ELT Journal, 76(2), 272-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccac003
  59. Winkel, A.F., Yingling, S., Jones, A.A., & Nicholson, J. (2017). Reflection as a learning tool in graduate medical education: A systematic review. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 9(4), 430-439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-16-00500.1
  60. Yesilbursa, A. (2011). Re ection at the interface of theory and practice: An analysis of pre-service English language teachers' written re ections. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 50-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n3.5

Дополнительные файлы

Доп. файлы
Действие
1. JATS XML
Скачать


Creative Commons License
Эта статья доступна по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».