“HIGH ART”: FEDOR DOSTOEVSKY AND STENOGRAPHY
- 作者: Andrianova I.S.1
-
隶属关系:
- Petrozavodsk State University
- 期: 卷 4, 编号 4 (2017)
- 页面: 164-181
- 栏目: Articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2409-5788/article/view/298081
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/j10.art.2017.3381
- ID: 298081
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
The importance of stenography, i. e. the art of writing at speech rate, is widely recognized in the history of evolution of the world science and culture, politics and economy. The given article systematizes the facts about the writers of the 19th and the first half of the 20th centuries who mastered the shorthand or used to resort to the help of professional stenographers in their creative activities. Taking into consideration this review the article makes a conclusion about the role and meaning of stenography in the creative process of F. M. Dostoevsky. He was the second writer in Russia (following V. V. Krestovsky) who applied shorthand writing in his literary work, but the only one in the world literature for whom stenography became something more than just shorthand. He considered it to be mysterious and “high art”. It modified and enriched the model of his creative process not for a while but for life, and it had an influence on the poetics of novels and of the story “A Gentle Creature”, it contributed changes in the writer’s private life and provoke the relatives’ interest (stepson P. A. Isaev, niece E. M. Dostoevskaya). In the course of the marriage of Dostoevsky and stenographer A. G. Snitkina the author’s artistic talent came to the peak. The largest and most important part of his body of work was created in that period. Unfortunately, the Dostoevsky archive keeps only a moderate part of the manuscripts with stenographic notes in them. It is described in the supplement to the article.
作者简介
Irina Andrianova
Petrozavodsk State University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: yarysheva@yandex.ru
Ph.D. in Philology Head of Web-laboratory of the Faculty of Philology
俄罗斯联邦, Petrozavodsk参考
- Alekseev N. A. The “Code” of N. G. Chernyshevsky. In: Krasnyy arkhiv, 1936, vol. 3 (76), pp. 221–225. Available at: http://istmat.info/files/uploads/40146/krasnyy_arhiv_76-1936.pdf (accessed 24 November 2017). (In Russ.)
- Andrianova I. S. “I Am Here to Work, Not to Make the Acquaintance”: Fedor Dostoevsky and Anna Snitkina. In: Neizvestnyy Dostoevskiy [The Unknown Dostoevsky], 2016, no. 3, pp. 128–143. Available at: http://unknown-dostoevsky.ru/files/redaktor_pdf/1478084439.pdf (accessed 24 November 2017). (In Russ.)
- Barsht K. A. “Calligraphy” of F. M. Dostoevsky. In: Novye aspekty v izuchenii Dostoevskogo [New Aspects in the Study of Dostoevsky]. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk State University Publ., 1994, pp. 101–129. (In Russ.)
- Bakhtin M. M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo [The Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics]. Moscow, Sovetskiy pisatel’ Publ., 1963. 363 p. (In Russ.)
- Viktorovich V. A. Dostoevsky and Vs. Krestovsky. In: Dostoevskiy: Materialy i issledovaniya [Dostoevsky: Materials and Researches]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1991, vol. 9, pp. 92–116. (In Russ.)
- Volgin I. L. Rodnye i blizkie: Istoriko-biograficheskie ocherki [Nearest and Dearest: Historical and Biographical Essays]. Moscow, Fond Dostoevskogo Publ., 2012. 1232 p. (In Russ.)
- Volgin I. L. Leaving Everyone: Leo Tolstoy as a Russian Wanderer. In: Oktyabr’, 2010, no. 10. Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/october/2010/10/vo2.html (accessed 24 November 2017). (In Russ.)
- Ershov N. A. Obzor russkikh stenograficheskikh sistem [A Review of Russian Shorthand Systems]. St. Petersburg, redaktsiya zhurnala “Pedagogicheskiy muzey” Publ., 1880. 14 p. (In Russ.)
- I–v (Protasov I. F.). About the Manuscript of Chernyshevsky. In: Voprosy stenografii i mashinopisi [Questions of Shorthand and Typewriting], 1928, no. 12, pp. 3–5. (In Russ.)
- I–v (Protasov I. F.). Tolstoy and Shorthand. In: Voprosy stenografii i mashinopisi [Questions of Shorthand and Typewriting], 1928, no. 8–9, pp. 3–5. (In Russ.)
- Kiyko E. I., Poshemanskaya Ts. M. An Unknown Source of the Text of the Novel “The Brothers Karamazov”. In: Dostoevskiy: Materialy i issledovaniya [Dostoevsky: Materials and Researches]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1978, vol. 3, pp. 3–12. (In Russ.)
- Kuleshov F. I. Tvorcheskiy put’ A. I. Kuprina, 1883–1907 [A. I. Kuprin’s Career as a Writer, 1883–1907]. Minsk, The Belarusian State University Publ., 1983. 351 p. Available at: http://kuprin-lit.ru/kuprin/kritika-o-kuprine/kuleshov-tvorcheskij-put/2-yama.htm (accessed 24 November 2017). (In Russ.)
- Likhachev D. S. Poetika drevnerusskoy literatury [The Poetics of Old Russian Literature]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979. 360 p. (In Russ.)
- Marcuse Ivan Karlovich. In: Afanas’ev N. I. Sovremenniki [Afanasyev N. I. Contemporaries]. St. Petersburg, 1910, vol. 2, pp. 282–284. Available at: http://нэб.рф/catalog/000199_000009_005030148/viewer/?page=295 (accessed 24 November 2017). (In Russ.)
- Myuller I. A Stenographic Novel. F. M. Dostoevsky and the Creator of the Russian Shorthand System P. M. Olkhin. In: Al’manakh bibliofila [Bibliophile’s Almanac], 1983, issue 15. Available at: http://redkayakniga.ru/biblioteki/item/f00/s00/z0000017/st012.shtml (accessed 24 November 2017). (In Russ.)
- Paperno I. Semiotika povedeniya: Nikolay Chernyshevskiy — chelovek epokhi realizma [The Semiotics of Behavior: Nikolay Chernyshevsky as a Person of the Epoch of Realism]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 1996. 207 p. (In Russ.)
- Poddubnaya R. N. The “Reality of the Ideal” in the Flash Fiction of “A Writer’s Diary”. In: Dostoevskiy: Materialy i issledovaniya [Dostoevsky: Materials and Researches]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1991, vol. 9, pp. 183–198. (In Russ.)
- Reyser S. A. Some Problems in the Study of the Novel “What Is To Be Done?”. In: Chernyshevskiy N. G. Chto delat’? [Chernyshevsky N. G. What Is To Be Done?]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1975. Available at: http://chernyshevskiy.lit-info.ru/chernyshevskiy/articles/rejser/rejser-1.htm (accessed 24 November 2017). (In Russ.)
- Reyser S. A. Russkaya paleografiya novogo vremeni (Neografiya) [Russian Paleography of the Modern Age (Neography)]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1982. 136 p. (In Russ.)
- Chulkov G. I. Kak rabotal Dostoevskiy [How Dostoevsky Worked]. Moscow, Sovetskiy pisatel’ Publ., 1939. 340 p. (In Russ.)
- Yurkovskiy A. M. Stenografiya skvoz’ veka: Ocherki po istorii stenografii [Shorthand Through Centuries: Essays on the History of Shorthand]. Moscow, Kniga Publ., 1969. 163 p. (In Russ.)
- Bowles H. Stenography and Orality in Dickens: Rethinking the Phonographic Myth. In: Dickens Studies Annual, 2017, vol. 48, pp. 21–44. (In English.)
- Bowles H. The Stenographic Creativity of Charles Dickens. In: Paper presented at the 28th AIA Conference Worlds of Words: Complexity, Creativity, and Conventionality in English Language, Literature and Culture (Pisa, 14–16 September 2017). Available at: http://www.fileli.unipi.it/2017aiaconference/session/stenographic-creativity-charles-dickens/ (accessed 24 November 2017). (In English.)
- Gitelman L. Scripts, Grooves, and Writing Machines: Representing Technology in the Edison Era. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1999. 304 p. (In English.)
- Marcus S. Language into Structure: Pickwick Revisited. In: Daedalus, 1972, vol. 101, pp. 183–202. (In English.)
- Kreikamp I. Voice and the Victorian Storyteller. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 69–88. (In English.)
补充文件
