Classical and Innovative Methods of Teaching Philosophy
- Авторлар: Baeva L.V.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Astrakhan Tatischev State University
- Шығарылым: Том 29, № 4 (2025): IN SEARCH OF A STRATEGY FOR TEACHING PHILOSOPHY: RUSSIAN AND WORLD EXPERIENCE
- Беттер: 978-993
- Бөлім: IN SEARCH OF A STRATEGY FOR TEACHING PHILOSOPHY: RUSSIAN AND WORLD EXPERIENCE
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2313-2302/article/view/362038
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2025-29-4-978-993
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IBQTYD
- ID: 362038
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
The choice and development of methods and forms of teaching philosophy is crucial in the context of the transformation of the education system, the dynamics of generational changes in the perception of information. In these conditions, interactive, project-based, and creative forms of working with the audience are becoming more relevant. The purpose of the work is to present the experience of teaching philosophy, combining classical and innovative, including the author’s approaches related to working in student teams (groups), the use of the TED format in lecture streams, teaching skills of working with philosophical texts using the methodology of “free-writing”, etc. Against the background of diverse sources of information in the modern world, the focus of humanitarian and philosophical education is transformed from the transfer of ready-made knowledge to its joint search and development through active forms of interaction between teachers and students, teaching the skill of working with text. For the modern interactive learning model, taking into account the peculiarities of the modern generation of youth, the most effective forms of learning are those involving “vertical” and “horizontal” dialogue, communication in teams (groups), and intellectual heuristic game practices. The article presents the theoretical foundations of dialogical, interactive philosophy teaching, based on the principles of leadership, “equal teaches equal”, and demonstrates examples of practically proven methods that have shown their effectiveness.
Авторлар туралы
Liudmila Baeva
Astrakhan Tatischev State University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: baevaludmila@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0439-525X
SPIN-код: 2735-5322
DSc in Philosophy, Professor, Full Professor of the Department of Philosophy, Cultural Studies and Sociology, Acting Dean of the Faculty of History and Social Communications
20A Tatischev St., Astrakhan, 414056, Russian FederationӘдебиет тізімі
- Drucker PF. The market: how to become a leader: Practice and principles. Moscow: Book chamber intern.; 1992. (In Russian).
- Solso RL, MacLin MK, MacLin OH. Cognitive psychology. Allyn & Bacon; 2005.
- Baryshkin AG, Reznik NA. Basic parameters of visualization of educational information. Computer tools in education. 2005;(3):38–44. (In Russian).
- Trufanova OV. The role of game methods in teaching philosophical disciplines and the formation of the ability to think. Humanitarian scientific research. 2012;(6). Available from: http://human.snauka.ru/2012/06/1318 (accessed: 05.05.2025). (In Russian).
- Bakhtin MM. Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Ed. 3. Moscow: Fiction publ.; 1972. (In Russian). EDN: VQMVAT
- Vygotsky LS. Thinking and speech. In: Selected psychological studies. Moscow: APN RSFSR; 1956. (In Russian).
- Baeva LV. Digital dialogue in education: cognitive, social, existential features and risks. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2022;26(2):439–453. (In Russian). doi: 10.22363/2313-2302-2022-26-2-439-453 EDN: QTXLKN
- Yakobson R. Linguistics and poetics. Structuralism: “pros” and “cons”. Moscow: Progress; 1975. Р. 193–230. (In Russian).
- Mazur E. Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2013.
- Sorina GV. Methodology of expert work (in the context of modern educational communications). Values and meanings. 2014;(2):52–62. (In Russian). EDN: SCZXQZ
- Work with text. The series “Modern technologies of university education”. Issue 1. Gusakovsky MA, BSU Center for Educational Development Problems. editors. Minsk: Propelei publ.; 2003. (In Russian).
- Robotova AS. Is it necessary to teach academic work and academic writing? Higher education in Russia. 2011;(10):47–54. (In Russian). EDN: OICAJB
- Goldstein J. Public Speaking: A Meta-Communicative Approach. Routledge; 2017.
- Khairulina ER. Development of students’ key competencies in design and creative activity. Pedagogy. 2007;(9):72–75. (In Russian). EDN: NBYDPX
Қосымша файлдар

