The role of perception of school leadership in emotional burnout and commitment to school among Russian teachers

Мұқаба


Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Introduction. The problem of professional burnout of teaching staff is especially relevant. Despite the numerous publications on this topic, there are practically no studies on the perception of leadership in the school environment and its impact on the emotional burnout of Russian teachers. The purpose of the research paper is to determine the relationship between the perception of school leadership and emotional burnout with the level of organizational commitment of teachers, as well as the relationship of emotional burnout and the perception of school leadership with the intentions of Russian teachers to change their profession.

Materials and Methods. The following methods were used for the analysis: a questionnaire for assessing professional burnout (C. Maslach), a scale of subjective well-being of a teacher (T. Renshaw), a questionnaire on the perception of school leadership in schools and the city’s education department (K. Crosby), the confidence level questionnaire (L. G. Pochebut), the scale of organizational commitment (R. Collie). 426 teachers from the regions of Russia took part in the survey. The SPSS 19.0 software was used for data processing.

Results. The analysis of foreign publications allowed us to summarize that emotional burnout is negatively associated with teachers’ support of learners, with parental relationships, and it is also associated with low learners’ performance in many subjects and insuffi level of skills to be gained in learning. In addition, emotional burnout correlates with learners’ aggressiveness, hyperactivity and attention problems, but is not associated with emotional distress (anxiety, depression and emotional control), and also negatively correlates with a positive outlook (optimism and subjective perception of happiness). The majority of respondents do not regret their chosen profession and remain faithful to it, considering themselves competent, and their teaching methods effective and successful. Emotional burnout is expected to be higher among those teachers who consider their professional choice to be erroneous. In addition, emotional burnout is negatively associated with the organizational commitment of teachers. Comparative analysis has shown that Moscow teachers have a more developed reduction of personal achievements, and teachers from other regions have a more obvious depersonalization. The degree of hostility and the level of trust were expected to be interrelated with professional burnout among teachers.

Discussion and Conclusion. The results of the study contribute to pedagogical psychology, the psychology of the teacher's work and his professional training in terms of understanding the phenomena of perception of the status of a leader and emotional burnout among teachers. The materials of the article will be useful to teachers and the pedagogical community involved in the teacher training system.

Авторлар туралы

Lubov Dukhanina

Moscow Pedagogical State University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: duhanina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6389-3497
ResearcherId: ABG-8392-2021

Professor of the Chair of Psychology of Education and Prevention of Deviant Behavior, Cand.Sci. (Hist.), Dr.Sci. (Ped.), Professor, Honored Worker of Public Education

Moscow

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Freudenberger H.J. Staff Burn-Out. Journal of Social Issues. 1974;30(1):159–165. doi: https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x
  2. Dukhanina L.N. Infrastructure of Giftedness or Will We Survive Till Monday in 2020? Psychological Science and Education. 2009;14(4):31–40. Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/psyedu/2009/n4/24492.shtml (accessed 25.02.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  3. Dukhanina L.N. [Cooperation between Preschool Organizations and the Parent Community in Today’s Challenges]. Vospitanie i obuchenie detey mladshego vozrasta. 2016;(5):577–579. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotrudnichestvo-organizatsiy-doshkolnogo-obrazovaniya-i-roditelskoy-obschestvennosti-v-usloviyah-sovremennyh-vyzovov/viewer (accessed 25.02.2022). (In Russ.)
  4. Dukhanina L.N. Values and Life Priorities of Russian Pupils. Vestnik of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics. 2020;26(2):20–28. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi. org/10.34216/2073-1426-2020-26-2-20-28
  5. Deyneka O.S., Dukhanina L.N., Maksimenko A.A. Cyberbullying and Victimization: A Review of Foreign Publications. Perspectives of Science and Education. 2020;47(5):273–292. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https:// doi.org/10.32744/pse.2020.5.19
  6. Akdemir O. The Effect of Teacher Burnout on Organizational Commitment in Turkish Context. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2019;7(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i4.4067
  7. Ford T.G., Olsen J., Khojasteh J., Ware J., Urick A. The Effects of Leader Support for Teacher Psychological Needs on Teacher Burnout, Commitment, and Intent to Leave. Journal of Educational Administration. 2019;57(6):615–634. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2018-0185
  8. Sokal L., Trudel L.T., Babb J. I’ve Had It! Factors Associated with Burnout and Low Organizational Commitment in Canadian Teachers during the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open. 2021;2:100023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100023
  9. Makarova G.A. Burnout Syndrome. Voprosy sotsialnogo obespecheniya. 2005;(8):11–21. Available at: https://studfile.net/preview/6749314 (accessed 25.02.2022). (In Russ.)
  10. Ronginskaya T.I. [Burnout Syndrome in Social Professions]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. 2002;23(3):85–95. Available at: https://gigabaza.ru/doc/76188.html (accessed 25.02.2022). (In Russ.)
  11. Pryazhnikov N.S., Ozhogova E.G. Emotional Burning Out and Personal Deformations in Psychological and Pedagogical Activity. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin. 2014;(4):33–43. Available at: https://msupsyj. ru/articles/detail.php?article=5212 (accessed 25.02.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  12. Formanyuk T.V. The “Emotional Burnout” Syndrome as an Indicator of Teacher Professional Maladaptation. Voprosy psikhologii. 1994;(6):57–64. (In Russ.)
  13. Borisova M. V. Psychological Determinants of Emotional Burnout in Teachers. Voprosy psikhologii. 2005;(2):96–104. (In Russ.)
  14. Gusteleva A.N. Meaningful Life Orientations of Teachers with Different Levels of Professional Burnout. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2008;(27):385–389. Available at: https://lib.herzen.spb.ru/media/magazines/contents/1/27(61)/gusteleva_27_61_385_389.pdf (accessed 25.02.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  15. Vodopyanova H.E. [Countering Burnout Syndrome in the Context of the Human Resource Concept]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 12 Psychology. Sociology. Education. 2009;(2):75–86. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/protivodeystvie-sindromu-vygoraniya-v-kontekste-resursnoy-kontseptsii-cheloveka/viewer (accessed 25.02.2022). (In Russ.)
  16. Lengle A. Emotional Burnout from the Perspective of Existential Analysis. Voprosy psikhologii. 2008;(2):3‒16. (In Russ.)
  17. Dikaya L.G. [Emotional Burning Out Phenomenon of the Specialist in the Context of the Metasystemic Approach]. Sotsialnaya psikhologiya truda: Teoriya i praktika. 2010;1:328–350. (In Russ.)
  18. Skaalvik E.M., Skaalvik S. Does School Context Matter? Relations with Teacher Burnout and Job Satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2009;25(3):518–524. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.12.006
  19. Atmaca C., Rızaoglu F., Türkdogan T., Yaylı D. An Emotion Focused Approach in Predicting Teacher Burnout and Job Satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2020;90:103025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103025
  20. Moe A., Katz I. Self-Compassionate Teachers are More Autonomy Supportive and Structuring Whereas Self-Derogating Teachers are More Controlling and Chaotic: The Mediating Role of Need Satisfaction and Burnout. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2020;96:103173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103173
  21. Aelterman N., Vansteenkiste M., Haerens L., Soenens B., Fontaine J.R., Reeve J. Toward an Integrative and Fine-Grained Insight in Motivating and Demotivating Teaching Styles: The Merits of a Circumplex Approach. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2019;111(3):497–521. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000293
  22. Saloviita T., Pakarinen E. Teacher Burnout Explained: Teacher-, Student-, and Organisation-Level Variables. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2021;97:103221. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103221
  23. Akça F., Yaman B. The Effects of Internal-External Locus of Control Variables on Burnout Levels of Teachers. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010;2(2):3976–3980. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2010.03.626
  24. Wolpe J. The Systematic Desensitization Treatment of Neuroses. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases. 1961;132(3):189–203. Available at: https://journals.lww.com/jonmd/Citation/1961/03000/THE_SYSTEMATIC_DESENSITIZATION_TREATMENT_OF.1.aspx (accessed 25.02.2022).
  25. Tümkaya S. Burnout of Primary School Teachers with Different Levels Locus of Control in Terms of Some Variables. Türk Psikolojik Danismave Rehberlik Dergisi. 2001;2(15):29–40. Available at: https://dergipark. org.tr/tr/pub/tpdrd/issue/21435/229675 (accessed 25.02.2022). (In Turkish, abstract in Eng.)
  26. Barutçu E., Serinkan C. Burnout Syndrome of Teachers: An Empirical Study in Denizli in Turkey. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;89:318–322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.853
  27. Madigan D.J., Kim L.E. Does Teacher Burnout Affect Students? A Systematic Review of Its Association with Academic Achievement and Student-Reported Outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research. 2021;105:101714. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101714
  28. Pap Z., Vîrga D., Lupșa D., Crașovan M. Building More than Knowledge: Teacher’s Support Facilitates Study-Related Well-Being through Intrinsic Motivation. A Longitudinal Multi-Group Analysis. Learning and Individual Differences. 2021;88:102010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102010
  29. Cappe Е., Poirier N., Engelberg A., Boujut E. Comparison of Teachers in France and in Quebec Working with Autistic Students: Self-Efficacy, Stress, Social Support, Coping, and Burnout. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2021;98:103244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103244
  30. Capone V., Joshanloo M., Park M.S.A. Burnout, Depression, Efficacy Beliefs, and Work-Related Variables among School Teachers. International Journal of Educational Research. 2019;95:97–108. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.02.001
  31. Weißenfels М., Benick М., Perels F. Can Teacher Self-Efficacy Act as a Buffer Against Burnout in Inclusive Classrooms? International Journal of Educational Research. 2021;109:101794. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijer.2021.101794
  32. Li R., Liu H., Chen Y., Yao M. Why Teachers Want to Leave? The Roles of Achievement Goals, Burnout and Perceived School Context. Learning and Individual Differences. 2021;89:102032. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102032
  33. Collie R.J., Shapka J.D., Perry N.E., Martin A.J. Teachers’ Psychological Functioning in the Workplace: Exploring the Roles of Contextual Beliefs, Need Satisfaction, and Personal Characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2016;108(6):788–799. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000088
  34. Renshaw T., Long A., Cook C. Assessing Teachers’ Positive Psychological Functioning at Work: Development and Validation of the Teacher Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire. School Psychology Quarterly. 2015;30(2):289–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000112

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Духанина Л.N., 2022

Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қолжетімді Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Founded in 1996
Registry Entry: PI № FS 77-70142 of June 16, 2017

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».