Long-term aesthetic outcomes of reconstructive surgeries with endoprosthetics for breast cancer: A review
- 作者: Khomidi U.K.1, Vlasova M.Y.1, Saribekyan E.K.1, Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D.1,2,3, Khakimova S.G.3,4, Khakimova G.G.4, Kodzoeva D.B.1
-
隶属关系:
- Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
- Patrice Lumumba People’s Friendship University of Russia
- Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute
- 期: 卷 27, 编号 1 (2025)
- 页面: 26-31
- 栏目: Articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/1815-1434/article/view/291144
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/18151434.2025.1.202905
- ID: 291144
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
Breast cancer (BC) is still the most common cancer among the female population both in the Russian Federation and in the world. Surgical intervention is an important step in the complex treatment of patients with BC. Several variants of reconstructive plastic surgeries are of the greatest interest to oncologists-mammologists and plastic surgeons. Currently, practitioners have plenty of choices of synthetic and biological materials for reconstruction and many options for flap techniques. Despite the abundance of foreign and Russian publications, the issue of assessing the delayed results of breast reconstruction is still relevant. In our paper, we analyzed studies on long-term aesthetic outcomes of reconstructive surgeries with endoprostheses in patients with BC. The technique of endoprosthetics, compared to reconstruction using the patient's tissues, is simpler in technical terms, less traumatic, and the recovery time for patients is shorter. However, despite the use of high-quality implants and the improvement of reconstructive surgery techniques, there remains a certain risk of complications (15–35%). In the early postoperative period, the most common complications are protrusion and infection of the endoprosthesis, necrosis of the areola and wound edges, and implant rotation. Of the late complications, the most relevant is grade III–IV capsular contracture according to J. Baker. The studies emphasize the importance of an individual approach and careful planning of comprehensive treatment to achieve optimal outcomes and improve the quality of life of patients with BC.
作者简介
Umar Khomidi
Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: khomidy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-9011-9189
Graduate Student
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowMaria Vlasova
Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre
Email: khomidy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7502-2288
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowErik Saribekyan
Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre
Email: khomidy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0827-7998
D. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowAziz Zikiryakhodzhaev
Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Patrice Lumumba People’s Friendship University of Russia
Email: khomidy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7141-2502
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow; Moscow; MoscowShakhnoz Khakimova
Patrice Lumumba People’s Friendship University of Russia; Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute
Email: khomidy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9491-0413
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow; Tashkent, UzbekistanGulnoz Khakimova
Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute
Email: khomidy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4970-5429
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
乌兹别克斯坦, TashkentDali Kodzoeva
Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre
Email: khomidy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-4257-3530
Resident
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow参考
- Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Шахзадова А.О. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2022 г. M., 2022 [Kaprin AD, Starinskii VV, Shakhzadova AO. Sostoyaniie onkologicheskoi pomoshchi naseleniiu Rossii v 2022 g. Moscow, 2022 (in Russian)].
- Иванов Ю.В., Шаробаро В.И., Панченков Д.Н., и др. Современные возможности реконструктивно-пластической хирургии рака молочной железы. Вестник экспериментальной и клинической хирургии. 2018;11(2) [Ivanov YV, Sharobaro VI, Panchenkov DN, et al. Modern Possibilities of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery of Breast Cancer. Bulletin of Experimental & Clinical Surgery. 2018;11(2) (in Russian)].
- Хакимова Ш.Г., Зикиряходжаев А.Д. Выбор метода реконструкции у больных раком молочной железы. Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена. 2021;10(4):53-8 [Khakimova ShG, Zikiryakhodzhaev AD. Choice for a reconstruction method in breast cancer patients. PA.Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2021;10(4):53-8 (in Russian)].
- Власова М.Ю., Зикиряходжаев А.Д., Решетов И.В., и др. Осложнения после одномоментной препекторальной реконструкции имплантатами с полиуретановым покрытием при раке молочной железы. Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы. 2020;16(4):12-20 [Vlasova MYu, Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Reshetov IV, et al. Complications after simultaneous prepectoral breast reconstruction using polyurethane-coated implants in patients with breast cancer. Tumors of Female Reproductive System. 2020;16(4):12-20 (in Russian)].
- Jimenez RB, Packowski K, Horick N, et al. The Timing of Acute and Late Complications Following Mastectomy and Implant-Based Reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2023;278(1):e203-8.
- Зикиряходжаев А.Д., Рассказова Е.А., Хакимова Ш.Г. Онкологическая безопасность радикальных подкожных/кожесохранных мастэктомий с одномоментной реконструкцией при раке. Вопросы онкологии. 2019;65(6):832-7 [Zikiriakhodzhaiev AD, Rasskazova EA, Khakimova SHG. Onkologicheskaia bezopasnost radikalnykh podkozhnykh/kozhesokhrannykh mastektomii s odnomomentnoi rekonstruktsiiei pri rake. Voprosy onkologii. 2019;65(6):832-7 (in Russian)].
- Rowland JH, Hewitt M, Ganz PA. Psychological impact of treatments for breast cancer. In: Rowland JH. Surgery of the breast: principles and art/editor. Scott L. Spear. 2nd ed. 2006; p. 383.
- Dieterich M, Reimer T, Dieterich H, et al. A short-term follow-up of implant based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLoop® Bra). Eur J Surg Oncol (EJSO). 2012;38(12):1225-30.
- Eriksson M, Anveden L, Celebioglu F, et al. Radiotherapy in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: risk factors, surgical outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures in a large Swedish multicenter cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;142(3):591-601. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2770-0
- Давыдов М.И., Аксель Е.М. Статистика злокачественных новообразований в России и странах СНГ в 2007 г. Вестник РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН. 2009;20(3):8-12 [Davydov MI, Aksel EM. Statistika zlokachestvennykh novoobrazovanii v Rossii i stranakh SNG v 2007 g. Vestnik RONTS im. NN Blokhina RAMN. 2009;20(3):8-12 (in Russian)].
- Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM, Colleen M. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part I. A prospective analysis of early complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(4):825-31.
- Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez М, et al. A Long-Term Study of Outcomes, Complications, and Patient Satisfaction with Breast Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(3):757-67.
- Friedrich M, Krämer S, Friedrich D. Difficulties of Breast Reconstruction – Problems That No One Likes to Face. Anticancer Res. 2021;41(11):5365-75. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15349
- Doherty С, Pearce S, Baxter N, et al. Trends in immediate breast reconstruction and radiation after mastectomy: A population study. Breast J. 2020;26(3):446-43.
- Hart SE, Brown DL, Kim HM, et al. Association of Clinical Complications of Chemotherapy and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Immediate Breast Reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(9):847-55. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2239
- Hung YC, McCarthy JT, Park BC, et al. Comparison of Complication Rates Between Subpectoral vs Prepectoral Techniques in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J. 2023;43(11):1285-92. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad145
- Liu J, Hou J, Li Z, et al. Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Capsular Contracture of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Arm Meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44(3):735-42. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01603-2
- Hughes K, Brown C, Perez V, et al. The effect of radiotherapy on implant-based breast reconstruction in the setting of skin-sparing mastectomy: clinical series and review of complications. Anticancer Research. 2012;32(2):553-7.
- Peled AW, Sears M, Wang F, et al. Complications after total skin-sparing mastectomy and expander-implant reconstruction: Effects of radiation therapy on the stages of reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80(1):10-3. doi: 10.1097/SAP.00000000000011862
- Naoum GE, Salama L, Niemierko A, et al. Single stage direct-to-implant breast reconstruction has lower complication rates than tissue expander and implant and comparable rates to autologous reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;106(3):514-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.11.008
- Luvsannyam E, Patel D, Hassan Z, et al. Overview of risk factors and prevention of capsular contracture following implant-based breast reconstruction and cosmetic surgery: a systematic review. Cureus. 2020;12(9):e10341. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10341
- Araco A, Caruso R, Araco F, et al. Capsular contractures: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6):1808-19. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf7f26
- Hvilsom GB, Hölmich LR, Steding-Jessen M, et al. Delayed breast implant reconstruction: a 10-year prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(11):1466-74.
- Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, et al. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):403e-10e.
- Collins JB, Verheyden CN. Incidence of breast hematoma after placement of breast prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(3):413e-20e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402ce0
- Granzow JW, Levine JL, Chiu ES, et al. Breast Reconstruction with Perforator Flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(1):1-12.
- Malekpour M, Malekpour F, Wang HT. Breast reconstruction: Review of current autologous and implant-based techniques and long-term oncologic outcome. World J Clin Cases. 2023;11(10):2201-12. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i10.2201
- Fischer JP, Wes AM, Tuggle CT, et al. Risk analysis and stratification of surgical morbidity after immediate breast reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):780-7.
- Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):395-408. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee987
- Albino FP, Koltz PF, Ling MN, et al. Irradiated autologous breast reconstructions: effects of patient factors and treatment variables. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(1):12-6.
- Fosnot J, Jandali S, Low DW, et al. Closer to an understanding of fate: the role of vascular complications in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(4):835-43.
- Sоrensen LT, Lars T. Wound healing and infection in surgery: the pathophysiological impact of smoking, smoking cessation, and nicotine replacement therapy: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;255(6):1069-79.
- Ehrl D, Heidekrueger PI, Haas EM, et al. Does cigarette smoking harm microsurgical free flap reconstruction? J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018;34(07):492-8.
- Mills E, Eyawo O, Lockhart I, et al. Smoking cessation reduces postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2011;124(2):144-54.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.09.013
- Panayi AC, Agha RA, Sieber BA, et al. Impact of Obesity on Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018;34(5):363-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1627449
- Hart A, Funderburk CD, Chu CK, et al. The Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Wound Healing in Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78(3):260-3. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000881
- Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, et al. Effect of patient age on outcomes in breast reconstruction: results from a multicenter prospective study J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(6):745-54.
- Сарибекян Э.К., Рассказова Е.А., Хомиди У.Х., Зикиряходжаев А.Д. Возможности реконструктивной хирургии при раке молочной железы у пожилых женщин. Клинический случай. Клинический разбор в общей медицине. 2023;4(12) [Saribekyan EK, Rasskazova EA, Khomidi UKh, Zikiryakhodzhaev AD. Reconstructive surgery options for elderly women with breast cancer. Clinical case. Clinical Review for General Practice. 2023;4(12):58-61 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.47407/kr2023.4.12.00332
补充文件
