Anthropological Problems of F. M. Dostoevsky’s Creativity
- Авторлар: Shalina M.A.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Evpatoria Institute of Social Sciences (branch) of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
- Шығарылым: Том 19, № 1 (2021)
- Беттер: 209-220
- Бөлім: Articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/1026-9479/article/view/285284
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/j9.art.2021.9044
- ID: 285284
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
The article deals with the anthropological aspects of Dostoevsky’s creative work. Its study requires researchers to take into account the classic’s pronounced Christian orientation of the artistic system. In the center of this system is the ideal of Christ, in whose light Dostoevsky’s concept of man is formed and the typology of characters is determined. The dominant type is the hero-ideologist, however, in addition to the underground type, he is also represented by the heroes of the “positive idea”. The latter preach the idea of salvation through the transformation of the person in Christ, rather than the idea of forcibly changing the world to achieve universal happiness. However, Dostoevsky’s anthropological discovery was not only the idea of compassion for a person fallen in sin, but also the concept of human transience in earthly existence, and hence the assertion of the idea of immortality, in which man will achieve his fullness and harmony. The quintessence of Dostoevsky’s anthropological concept is the idea of “all-humanity” (“vsechelovechnost”) and “universal responsiveness”, capable of uniting people on the basis of spiritual brotherhood and acceptance of the alien as one’s own.
Авторлар туралы
Marina Shalina
Evpatoria Institute of Social Sciences (branch) of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: marie_ka@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4373-8331
PhD (Philology), Associate Professor of the Department of philological disciplines and methods of their teaching
Ресей, EvpatoriaӘдебиет тізімі
- Bakhtin M. M. Dostoevsky’s Idea. In: Bakhtin M. M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo [Bakhtin M. M. The Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1972, pp. 130–169. (In Russ.)
- Berdyaev N. A. Mirosozertsanie Dostoevskogo [Dostoevsky’s World View]. Available at: http://www.vehi.net/berdyaev/dostoevsky/index.html (accessed on April 22, 2020). (In Russ.)
- Berdyaev N. A. Otkrovenie o cheloveke v tvorchestve Dostoevskogo [Revelation on Man in Dostoevsky’s Works]. Available at: http://www.vehi.net/berdyaev/ otkrov.html (accessed on April 22, 2020). (In Russ.)
- Zakharov V. N. Christian Realism in Russian Literature (Problem Statement). In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics], 2001, vol. 6, pp. 5–20. Available at: https://poetica.pro/journal/article.php?id=2511 (accessed on April 22, 2020). doi: 10.15393/j9.art.2001.2511 (In Russ.)
- Zakharov V. N. Dostoevsky’s Poetic Anthropology. In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics], 2013, issue 11, pp 150–164. Available at: https://poetica.pro/files/redaktor_pdf/1431455945.pdf (accessed on April 22, 2020). doi: 10.15393/j9.art.2013.377 (In Russ.)
- Zakharov V. N. Who Is a Genius, Who Is Shakespeare? From the Anthropological Discoveries of Dostoevsky. In: Russkaya slovesnost’, 2018, no. 2, pp. 3–8. (In Russ.)
- Kinosita T. Tvorchestvo F. M. Dostoevskogo: problema avtorskoy pozitsii: sbornik statey [Works of F. M. Dostoevsky. The Problem of the Author’s Position: Collection of Articles]. St. Petersburg, Serebryanyy vek Publ., 2017. 160 p. (In Russ.)
- Krinitsyn A. B. On the Specificity of Dostoevsky’s Hero-Ideologist as a Literary Type. In: Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya [Philology: Scientific Research], 2016, no. 2, pp. 144–152. DOI: 10.7256 / 2305-6177.2016.2.18424 (In Russ.)
- Losskiy N. O. Dostoevskiy i ego khristianskoe miroponimanie [Dostoevsky and His Christian Understanding of the World]. Available at: https://azbyka. ru/otechnik/6/dostoevskij-i-ego-hristianskoe-miroponimanie/ (accessed on April 22, 2020). (In Russ.)
- Prepodobnyy Iustin (Popovich). Dostoevskiy o Evrope i slavyanstve [Dostoevsky About Europe and Slavism]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Sretenskiy monastyr’ Publ., 2002. 288 p. (In Russ.)
- Prepodobnyy Iustin (Popovich). Dostoevsky as a Prophet and Apostle of Orthodox Realism. In: Prepodobnyy Iustin (Popovich). Filosofskie propasti [Venerable Justin Popović. Philosophical Chasms]. Moscow, Izdatel’skiy Sovet Russkoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi Publ., 2004, pp. 172–187. (In Russ.)
- Stepanyan K. A. «Soznat’ i skazat’»: «Realizm v vysshem smysle» kak tvorcheskiy metod F. M. Dostoevskogo [“To Realize and to Say”: “Realism in the Best Sense of the Term” as an Artistic Method of F. M. Dostoevsky]. Moscow, Raritet Publ., 2005. 512 p. (In Russ.)
- Shalina M. A. The Story “Notes from the Underground” in the System of Classes on the Dostoevsky’s Works. In: Filologicheskie chteniya: Chelovek. Tekst. Diskurs: materialy konferentsii [Philological Readings: Man. Text. Discourse: Conference Materials], 2019, pp. 190–197. (In Russ.)
- Jones Malcolm V. Dostoevsky After Bakhtin: Readings in Dostoevsky’s Fantastic Realism. Cambridge etc., Cambridge University Press Publ., 2005. 221 p. (In English).
Қосымша файлдар
