Мақаланы E-mail арқылы жіберу Legality in the writings of legal scholars of the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition and criticism of relevant approaches
- Авторлар: Savenkov A.A.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Шығарылым: № 7 (2025)
- Беттер: 16-23
- Бөлім: Legal, political, philosophical and religious thought
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/1026-9452/article/view/306378
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026945225070021
- ID: 306378
Дәйексөз келтіру
Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат берілді
Тек жазылушылар үшін
Аннотация
The article examines the problems of legality and its various interpretations in the history of modern political and legal thought in the countries of the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition. There are significant differences in the variety of different approaches to understanding the role of law, the legislation and legality in various national legal traditions. The problem of legality in the conditions of socialism was determined by certain obligatory ideological prerequisites, from the standpoint of which it was given the formal meaning of a legal regime. In the Anglo-Saxon legal area, interpretations that formalize the watershed between common law and so-called statutory law, i. e. acts adopted by legislative authorities, are widespread and still insufficiently mastered in a number of respects. For Anglo-Saxon law and related legal thought, the issue of legality is becoming increasingly relevant today in terms of the protection of rights and freedoms, as a condition for the inadmissibility of reducing the levels of legal protection and security guaranteed by common law. Understanding legality in this tradition means, first of all, analyzing the logic of judicial interpretation and attempts to build legal knowledge around and based on anthropological approaches. The idea and principle of legality in the context of the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition reveal a number of significant limitations related to understanding the role of law and rational legal construction in social practice.
Авторлар туралы
A. Savenkov
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: artem.199417@yandex.ru
10 Znamenka str., 119019 Moscow, Russia
Әдебиет тізімі
- Gorban V. S. Historiography of psychological theories of law // Herald of the Moscow University. Ser. 11: Law. 2024. No. 4. Pp. 79–104. doi: 10.55959/MSU0130-0113-11-65-4-5 (in Russ.).
- Gorban V. S. The concept, theory and problems of forming a general concept of the effectiveness of legislation. M., 2009 (in Russ.).
- Gorban V. S. The role of historiography in the Philosophy of Law and the formation of the conceptual language of modern legal theory. 2025. Vol. 25. No. 1. Pp. 107–127. doi: 10.17506/26867206_2025_25_1_107 (in Russ.).
- Kovalev V. A. Bourgeois legality: theoretical illusions and judicial-police reality. M., 1986 (in Russ.).
- Lukasheva E. A. Legal awareness and legality in a socialist society (The ideal. and socio-psychological. social security factors. Legality): dis. … Doctor of Law. M., 1972 (in Russ.).
- Pligin V. N. The problem of legitimacy in modern political and legal doctrines: abstract … Doctor of Law. M., 2021 (in Russ.).
- Savenkov A. N. A new technological order and socio-humanitarian challenges // State and Law. 2025. No. 1. Pp. 14–36. doi: 10.31857/S1026945225010017 (in Russ.).
- Fuller L. The morality of law / transl. from English by T. Danilova. Ed. revised and add. M., 2007 (in Russ.).
- Chen B. The Principle of Legality: Protecting Statutory Rights from Statutory Infringement? (August 13, 2018) // Sydney Law Review. 2019. No. 41(1). Pp. 73–104.
- Doyle J., Wells B. How Far Can the Common Law Go towards Protecting Human Rights? // Alston Ph. (ed.). Promoting Human Rights through Bills of Rights: Comparative Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 1999. Pp. 13–18.
- Elliott M. Constitutional Legislation. Fundamental Rights and Article 50 // Elliott M. Public Law for Everyone (8 September 2016). URL: https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2016/09/08/brexit-constitutional-legislation-fundamental-rights-and-article-50/
- Eskridge W. Jr., Frickey P. Quasi-Constitutional Law: Clear Statement Rules as Constitutional Lawmaking // Vanderbilt Law Review. 1992. Vol. 45. Рp. 593–646.
- Geiringer C. The Principle of Legality and the Bill of Rights Act: A Critical Examination of ‘R v Hansen’ // New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law. 2008. No. 6(1). Pp. 59–88.
- Habermas J. Wie Ist Legitimität Durch Legalität Möglich? // Kritische Justiz. 1987. Vol. 20. No. 1. S. 1–16.
- Joseph P. The Principle of Legality: Constitutional Innovation // Dan Meagher and Matthew Groves (eds.). The Principle of Legality in Australia and New Zealand. Federation Press, 2017. Pp. 31–42.
- Manning J. Clear Statement Rules and the Constitution // Columbia Law Review. 2010. Vol. 110. Pp. 399–404.
- Meagher D. The Principle of Legality as Clear Statement Rule: Significance and Problems // Sydney Law. Review. 2014. No. 36(3). Pp. 413–443.
- Shapiro S. Legality. Harvard University Press, 2011.
- The Rule of law / ed. by R. P. Wolff. NY, 1971.
Қосымша файлдар
