SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS AS A CHARACTERISTIC OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION’S ABILITY TO RESPOND TO GREAT CHALLENGES
- Authors: Sidorenko S.1
-
Affiliations:
- State University of Management
- Issue: No 12 (2025)
- Pages: 79-92
- Section: SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND INNOVATION
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/0207-3676/article/view/359845
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034543X25120052
- ID: 359845
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of indicators characterizing the dynamics of scientific and technological development in 2019–2023, which acts as a characteristic of the ability of the Russian Federation to respond to great challenges. The share of domestic expenditures on research and development in GDP fluctuates slightly, remaining within 1%, which is significantly lower than the same indicator in economically and technologically developed countries of the world. There has been a steady increase in spending on civil science from the federal budget in absolute terms; the increase in funding for applied research exceeds the increase in funding for basic research. The number of researchers in the Russian Federation decreased in 2023 compared to 2019 (while there is an increase in the number of researchers in the natural sciences and humanities); in the technical, medical and social sciences, the number of researchers decreased. The indicator “number of highly cited publications by Russian authors” grew. The share of highly cited publications by Russian authors in the global number of such publications increased in 2020–2022, but in 2023 there was a decrease in the indicator, which means problems with the integration of Russian science into the global scientific community; the decline in the visibility of Russian science. The prospects for scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation in the context of great challenges are determined by the following factors: the availability of natural resources, historically strong scientific schools in mathematics, physics and other natural sciences; the development of certain priority areas of science and technology; and the implementation of innovation support programs. In this regard, it is proposed to focus efforts in the following areas: increasing funding for scientific research, creating favorable conditions for the work of scientists, improving innovation infrastructure, stimulating cooperation between science and production, and concentrating resources on the development of priority areas.
About the authors
S. Sidorenko
State University of Management
Author for correspondence.
Email: sidor@presidium.ras.ru
Grand Ph.D. in Economics, Professor Moscow, Russian Federation
References
- Стратегия научно-технологического развития Российской Федерации (утв. Указом Президента РФ от 28.02.2024 г. № 145). URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/50358 (дата обращения: 10.08.2025).
- Ленчук Е.Б. Роль государства в управлении научно-технологическим развитием: от теории к практике // Интеллект. Инновации. Инвестиции. 2025. № 2. С. 11–22. doi: 10.25198/2077- 7175-2025-2-11. EDN: TEIBKD.
- Смородинская Н. Глобальный разворот в национальных промышленных стратегиях: курс на технологическую самодостаточность / Н. Смородинская Д. Катуков // Общество и экономика. 2024. № 12. С.5–25. doi: 10.31857/S0207367624120014. EDN: YJLLMU.
- Наука, инновации, технологии. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/statistics/science (дата обращения: 10.08.2025).
- Индикаторы науки: 2025: статистический сборник / Л.М. Гохберг, К.А. Дитковский, Е.И. Евневич и др.; Нац. исслед. ун-т «Высшая школа экономики». М.: ИСИЭЗ ВШЭ, 2025. 396 с. URL: https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/1013106714.pdf (дата обращения: 10.08.2025).
- Gross domestic spending on R&D (% of GDP). URL: https://w3.unece.org/SDG/ru/Indicator?id=123 (дата обращения: 10.08.2025).
- Bilas V. Relationship between research and development and economic growth in the EU countries / V. Bilas, M.Bosnjak, T. Cizmic // Economic and social development: Book of proceedings. 2016. С. 223. URL: https://www.bib.irb.hr:8443/979049/download/979049.2016_Book_of_Proceedings_Barcelona_Online.pdf#page=233 (дата обращения: 10.08.2025).
- Coccia M. What is the optimal rate of R&D investment to maximize productivity growth? // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2009. Т. 76. № 3. С.433–446. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040162508000383 (дата обращения: 10.08.2025).
- Fraumeni B.M. R&D in the national income and product accounts: A first look at its effect on GDP / B.M. Fraumeni, S. Okubo //Measuring capital in the new economy. University of Chicago Press. 2005. С. 275–322. URL: https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c10624/c10624.pdf (дата обращения: 10.08.2025).
- Sokolov-Mladenović S. R&D expenditure and economic growth: EU28 evidence for the period 2002–2012 / S. Sokolov-Mladenović, S. Cvetanović, I. Mladenović // Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja. 2016. Т. 29. № 1. С. 1005–1020. URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/253448 (дата обращения: 10.08.2025).
- Ulku H. R&D, innovation, and economic growth: An empirical analysis. 2004. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=879010 (дата обращения: 10.08.2025).
- Van Pottelsberghe B. R&D and productivity growth: a panel data analysis of 16 OECD countries / B. Van Pottelsberghe, D. Guellec. 2001. URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/6341/1/bvp-0080.pdf (дата обращения: 10.08.2025).


