Rupture of the superficial dorsal vein of the penis
- Authors: Simanov R.N.1,2, Romanov A.A.1, Amdiy R.E.3
-
Affiliations:
- Petrozavodsk State University
- V.A. Baranov Republican Hospital
- Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 15, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 101-107
- Section: Сlinical observations
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/uroved/article/view/314205
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved641968
- ID: 314205
Cite item
Abstract
This article presents a clinical case of one of the rarest pathologies in emergency urology, previously described only five times in the global medical literature — rupture of the superficial dorsal vein with penile deviation. Clinical diagnosis of this condition is quite difficult without the use of additional imaging methods, which may not be available in emergency settings. However, establishing an accurate diagnosis in the shortest possible time allows for the most appropriate treatment using conservative or surgical methods. The paper provides an analysis of the causes, differential and clinical diagnosis, management strategies, and therapeutic principles with clear indications for surgical intervention. Currently, there are no clinical guidelines for the management of patients with rupture of the superficial dorsal penile vein. Patient complaints and physical examination, as well as Doppler ultrasound imaging, which allows assessing the vascular network of the penis, including the superficial dorsal vein, can assist in establishing a diagnosis of this condition. Magnetic resonance imaging can help identify tunica albuginea rupture, vascular injury, and penile fracture. If there is any doubt regarding the diagnosis, surgical intervention should be performed, including exploration of the corpora cavernosa and the urethra.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Ruslan N. Simanov
Petrozavodsk State University; V.A. Baranov Republican Hospital
Author for correspondence.
Email: Ruslansimanov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1246-7233
SPIN-code: 3747-8245
MD
Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk; PetrozavodskAleksey A. Romanov
Petrozavodsk State University
Email: Rmnvlx@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-4373-3970
SPIN-code: 8302-1205
Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk
Refat E. Amdiy
Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
Email: r.e.amdiy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1305-5791
SPIN-code: 2399-7041
Scopus Author ID: 6506347944
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Mirzazadeh M, Fallahkarkan M, Hosseini J. Penile fracture epidemiology, diagnosis and management in Iran: a narrative review. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(2):158–166. doi: 10.21037/tau.2016.12.03
- Dias-Filho AC, Fregonesi A, Martinez CAT, et al. Can the snapping sound discriminate true from false penile fractures? Bayesian analysis of a case series of consecutively treated penile fracture patients. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32(4):446–454. doi: 10.1038/s41443-019-0199-7
- Agostini E, Vinci A, Bardhi D, et al. Improving clinical diagnostic accuracy and management of False penile fractures characterizing typical clinical presentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2023;41(7):1785–1791. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04456-2
- Gaspar SS, Dias JS, Martins F, Lopes TM. Sexual urological emergencies. Sex Med Rev. 2015;3(2):93–100. doi: 10.1002/smrj.44
- Ettaouil M, Waffar C, Moudlige H, et al. Isolated rupture of the superficial dorsal vein of the penis during intercourse: A rare cause of false penile fracture. Urol Case Rep. 2021;39:101761. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2021.101761
- Bar-Yosef Y, Greenstein A, Beri A, et al. Dorsal vein injuries observed during penile exploration for suspected penile fracture. J Sex Med. 2007;4(4–2):1142–1146. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00347.x
- Kurkar A, Elderwy AA, Orabi H. False fracture of the penis: Different pathology but similar clinical presentation and management. Urol Ann. 2014;6(1):23–26. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.127015
- Ganem JP, Kennelly MJ. Ruptured Mondor’s disease of the penis mimicking penile fracture. J Urol. 1998;159(4):1302. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63591-2
- Eken A, Acil M, Arpaci T. Isolated rupture of the superficial vein of the penis. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014;8(5–6):E371–373. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1712
- Aminu S, Usman F, Kyriacos A. A physical sign of coital rupture of superficial dorsal vein of penis. Cent European J Urol. 2011;64(2):90–91. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2011.02.art
- Koifman L, Barros R, Júnior RAS, et al. Penile fracture: diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of 150 patients. Urology. 2010;76(6): 1488–1492. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.043
- Puñal Pereira A, Pérez Fentes D, Toucedo Caamaño V, et al. Rupture of the superficial vein of penis: therapeutic options. Arch Esp Urol. 2010;63(10):871–873. doi: 10.4321/S0004-06142010001000007
- Avery LL, Scheinfeld MH. Imaging of penile and scrotal emergencies. Radiographics. 2013;33(3):721–740. doi: 10.1148/rg.333125158
- Chung CH, Szeto YK, Lai KK. ‘Fracture’ of the penis: a case series. Hong Kong Med J. 2006;12(3):197–200.
- Sharma GR. Rupture of the superficial dorsal vein of the penis. Int J Urol. 2005;12(12):1071–1073. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01212.x
- Truong H, Ferenczi B, Cleary R, Healy KA. Superficial dorsal venous rupture of the penis: false penile fracture that needs to be treated as a true urologic emergency. Urology. 2016;97:e21–e22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.030
- Feki W, Derouiche A, Belhaj K, et al. False penile fracture: report of 16 cases. Int J Impot Res. 2007;19(5):471–473. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901574
- Baran C, Topsakal M, Kavukcu E, Karadeniz T. Superficial dorsal vein rupture imitating penile fracture. Korean J Urol. 2011;52(4): 293–294. doi: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.4.293
Supplementary files
