Long-term outcomes of free synthetic sling placement for the treatment of urinary incontinence in patients with morbid obesity

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stress urinary incontinence is the most common lower urinary tract disorder in women. Obesity notably increases the risk of this condition. Surgical correction using a free synthetic sling is considered the gold standard of treatment; however, long-term outcomes in patients with morbid obesity remain controversial.

AIM: This work aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of urethropexy using a free synthetic sling in patients with urinary incontinence and morbid obesity.

METHODS: A comparative analysis of treatment outcomes was performed in 81 women with urinary incontinence and morbid obesity, divided into two groups according to the surgical approach: transobturator (n = 40) and retropubic (n = 41). Treatment outcomes were assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Long-term results were evaluated after 12 months or longer. Follow-up examinations included vaginal examination with cough stress test, uroflowmetry, bladder ultrasonography with assessment of postvoid residual urine volume, and completion of the UDI-6, ICIQ-SF, and I-QOL questionnaires.

RESULTS: The median age was 57.5 years [51.5; 63.5] in the transobturator group and 61 years [54; 65] in the retropubic group. The median body mass index was 38.9 kg/m2 [36.9; 40.1] in the transobturator group and 39.1 kg/m2 [37.2; 40.5] in the retropubic group. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 12 ± 2.4 months. Patients in both groups reported improved quality of life. The rate of recurrent urinary incontinence based on the cough stress test was 6 cases (14.6%) in the transobturator group and 4 cases (10%) in the retropubic group.

CONCLUSION: A free synthetic sling is an effective method for the correction of stress urinary incontinence in patients with morbid obesity. A lower recurrence rate in the long-term period was observed in the retropubic approach group.

About the authors

Mikhail Yu. Soluyanov

Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: msoluyanov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2635-9161
SPIN-code: 3394-5755

Cand. Sci. (Medicine); Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymрhology

Russian Federation, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

Danila I. Chernopyatov

Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: danila.chernopyatov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1190-1747
SPIN-code: 9067-8168

Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymрhology

Russian Federation, Novosibirsk

Mikhail Yu. Gvozdev

Russian University of Medicine

Email: m.gvozdev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8684-9336
SPIN-code: 7588-4270

Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Zhang RQ, Xia MC, Cui F, et al. Epidemiological survey of adult female stress urinary incontinence. BMC Women’s Health. 2021;21(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01319-z EDN: IXFLLC
  2. Patel UJ, Godecker AL, Giles DL, Brown HW. Updated prevalence of urinary incontinence in women: 2015–2018 national population-based survey data. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022;28(4):181–187. doi: 10.1097/SPV.000000000000097 EDN: WNUJYS
  3. Minassian VA, Stewart WF, Wood GC. Urinary incontinence in women: variation in prevalence estimates and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(2 Pt 1):324–331. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000267220.48987.17
  4. Soluyanov MY, Rakitin FA, Gvozdev MY. Urinary incontinence in obese women. Urology Reports (St. Petersburg). 2023;13(3):283–290. doi: 10.17816/uroved566318 EDN: ETGCJJ
  5. Cao S, Hu X, Tang Y, et al. Weight-adjusted-waist index is positively associated with urinary incontinence: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001–2018. Eur J Med Res. 2024;29(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01971-9
  6. Dursun M, Otunctemur A, Ozbek E, et al. Stress urinary incontinence and visceral adipose index: a new risk parameter. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014;46(12):2297–2300. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0832-9 EDN: AMVDFO
  7. Wang L, Ye L. Clinical efficacy and safety meta-analysis of different surgical approaches for female stress urinary incontinence. Arch Esp Urol. 2024;77(5):479–490. doi: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247705.67 EDN: IHNCZF
  8. Lo TS, Al-Kharabsheh AM, Pue LB, et al. Mid urethral slings for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence in overweight and obese women: surgical outcomes and preoperative predictors of failure. J Urol. 2020;204(4):787–792. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001085 EDN: JYYOEL
  9. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hunskaar S. Are smoking and other lifestyle factors associated with female urinary incontinence? The Norwegian EPINCONT Study. BJOG. 2003;110(3): 247–254.
  10. Meschia M, Rossi G, Bertini S, et al. Single incision mid-urethral slings: impact of obesity on outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(2):571–574. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.08.007
  11. Elshatanoufy S, Matthews A, Yousif M, et al. Effect of morbid obesity on midurethral sling efficacy for the management of stress urinary incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25(6):448–452. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000594
  12. Oliveira R, Botelho F, Silva P, et al. Single-incision sling system as primary treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: prospective 12 months data from a single institution. BJU Int. 2011;108(10):1616–1621. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10158.x
  13. Weltz V, Guldberg R, Lose G. Efficacy and perioperative safety of synthetic mid-urethral slings in obese women with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(5):641–648. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2567-7 EDN: ELWMBO
  14. Lundmark DA, Westergren SM, Ek M. Obesity as an independent risk factor for poor long-term outcome after mid-urethral sling surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103(8):1657–1663. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14883

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07
 


Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).