Blood-sparing strategies in radical prostatectomy using temporary occlusion of the internal iliac arteries
- Authors: Popov S.V.1,2,3, Chernov K.E.1, Movchan K.N.4, Vyazovtsev P.V.1, Chernova A.Y.4, Semikina S.P.1, Kopytova I.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- Clinical Hospital of St. Luke
- Saint Petersburg Medico-Social Institute
- Kirov Military Medical Academy
- Medical Information and Analytical Center
- Issue: Vol 15, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 361-369
- Section: Original articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/uroved/article/view/381652
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved686373
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KHJJYB
- ID: 381652
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy is the primary surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer. The procedure is often associated with substantial blood loss, particularly in patients with large prostate volumes. Reducing intraoperative blood loss during radical prostatectomy remains an important objective of contemporary oncological urology. One of the proposed approaches for preventing intraoperative hemorrhage is temporary interruption of blood flow through the internal iliac arteries; however, the scientific data on the application of this technique remain limited.
AIM: This work aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of short-term occlusion of the internal iliac arteries for reducing blood loss during radical prostatectomy in patients with large prostate volume.
METHODS: This single-center controlled study included 60 patients with localized prostate cancer and a prostate volume of ≥100 cm3. Patients were divided into a main group and a control group, with 30 patients in each. Patients in the main group underwent robotic radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy and temporary interruption of blood flow in the internal iliac arteries. Patients in the control group underwent standard radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. The groups were comparable regarding the main clinical characteristics.
RESULTS: In the main group, blood loss did not exceed 350 mL and was more than twofold lower on average than in the control group: 161.2 vs. 376.1 mL, respectively (p < 0.001). Operative time was also significantly shorter in the main group compared with the control group: 156.4 vs. 188.4 minutes, respectively (p = 0.01). Two patients in the control group required intraoperative blood transfusion due to high blood loss, whereas no transfusions were required in the main group.
CONCLUSION: Radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer and large prostate volume (>100 cm3), when performed using temporary occlusion of the internal iliac arteries, allows for a substantial reduction in intraoperative blood loss and operative time.
About the authors
Sergey V. Popov
Clinical Hospital of St. Luke; Saint Petersburg Medico-Social Institute; Kirov Military Medical Academy
Email: doc.popov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2767-7153
SPIN-code: 3830-9539
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg; Saint PetersburgKirill E. Chernov
Clinical Hospital of St. Luke
Author for correspondence.
Email: chernov_ke@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9150-1473
SPIN-code: 6469-1894
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgKonstantin N. Movchan
Medical Information and Analytical Center
Email: movchank@spbmiac.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9843-9868
SPIN-code: 5803-2682
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgPavel V. Vyazovtsev
Clinical Hospital of St. Luke
Email: vpv.doc@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3105-5947
SPIN-code: 4792-9434
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAnna Yu. Chernova
Medical Information and Analytical Center
Email: panasova_anna13@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0131-5648
MD
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgSofiya P. Semikina
Clinical Hospital of St. Luke
Email: semikina9595@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0805-6810
SPIN-code: 9601-0923
MD
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgIrina Yu. Kopytova
Clinical Hospital of St. Luke
Email: copytova.i@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-5173-2485
SPIN-code: 3289-4597
MD
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Kretschmer A, Buchner A, Grabbert M, et al. Perioperative patient education improves long-term satisfaction rates of low-risk prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2017;35(8):1205–1212. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1998-9 EDN: VZCUAC
- Gadzhiev NK, Rybalchenko VA, Dzhalilov IB, et al. Radical prostatectomy in the Russian Federation: features of perioperative management and nuances of technical execution. Cancer Urology. 2023;19(3):45–59. doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2023-19-3-45-59 EDN: AMAMAT
- Perepechai VA, Vasilev ON. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology Herald. 2018;6(3):57–72. doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2018-6-3-57-72 EDN: YLSMTJ
- Chibichyan MB. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology Herald. 2018;6(1):81–93. doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2018-6-1-81-93 EDN: YTZAEG
- Shikhzadaev MSh, Shkol’nik MI, Zharinov GM, Bogomolov OA. Functional results of radical prostatectomy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. Urology Reports (St.-Petersburg). 2019;(1S):111–112. (In Russ.)
- Wang J, Hu K, Wang Y, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(6):2617–2631. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01714-8 EDN: RLDXVD
- Kim MS, Jang WS, Chung DY, et al. Effect of prostate gland weight on the surgical and oncological outcomes of extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BMC Urol. 2019;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0434-4 EDN: VCKZPH
- Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate. 1983;4(5):473–485. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990040506
- Feng T, Heulitt G, Lee JJ, et al. Randomised comparison of techniques for control of the dorsal venous complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2020;126(5):586–594. doi: 10.1111/bju.15133 EDN: IUPMGG
- Jaber AR, Moschovas MC, Saikali S, et al. Impact of prostate size on the functional and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus. 2024;10(2):263–270. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.01.007 EDN: YBSNUY
Supplementary files

