Systematic assessment of early complications after radical cystectomy for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer and bladder cancer with minimal intradetrusor invasion at a single center
- Authors: Khomyakov V.A.1, Vasilyev O.N.1, Perepechay V.A.1, Kogan M.I.1, Glukhov V.P.1, Loskutov M.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- Rostov State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 15, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 351-360
- Section: Original articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/uroved/article/view/381651
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved691847
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CQIKVV
- ID: 381651
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer ranks tenth among all malignant neoplasms worldwide, with about 573,300 newly diagnosed cases and about 212,500 deaths annually. Patients with very high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer, as well as those with tumor progression, are eligible for the same treatment as patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer—namely, immediate radical cystectomy.
AIM: This study aimed to assess morbidity in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer and bladder cancer with minimal muscle invasion.
METHODS: The study analyzed outcomes of radical treatment in 151 patients who underwent radical cystectomy. Based on postoperative pathological examination, two study groups were formed: group 1 included 49 patients with non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (pT1 stage), and group 2 included 102 patients with bladder cancer with minimal muscle invasion (pT2a stage).
RESULTS: Early postoperative complications not related to urinary diversion were observed in 44.9% of patients in group 1 and in 32.4% of patients in group 2 (p = 0.135). The incidence of these complications was 77.6 ± 12.6 versus 51.0 ± 7.1 cases per 100 patients in the comparison groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Urinary diversion–related complications occurred in 13.3% and 16.7% of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The incidence of these complications in groups 1 and 2 was 14.3 ± 5.4 and 16.6 ± 4.0 cases per 100 patients, respectively. At the same time, significant differences were identified in the distribution of patients across Clavien–Dindo complication grades 1, 2–3a, 3b, and more severe complications: 43.5%, 21.7%, and 34.8% in group 1, and 23.8%, 42.9%, and 33.3% in group 2, respectively (p = 0.0025).
CONCLUSION: Substantial differences in the pattern of early postoperative complications after radical cystectomy were identified in the pT1 group, likely attributable to multiple prior organ-sparing interventions and other treatment modalities. In addition, more severe Clavien–Dindo complications were more frequently observed in the pT2a group compared with group 1.
About the authors
Vladimir A. Khomyakov
Rostov State Medical University
Email: michurinsk-rostov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-1106-6674
SPIN-code: 9930-8779
MD
Russian Federation, Rostov-on-DonOleg N. Vasilyev
Rostov State Medical University
Email: vasilyev_on@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5642-4521
SPIN-code: 8565-4276
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor
Russian Federation, Rostov-on-DonVadim A. Perepechay
Rostov State Medical University
Email: perepechay_va@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6869-8773
SPIN-code: 3252-3985
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor
Russian Federation, Rostov-on-DonMikhail I. Kogan
Rostov State Medical University
Email: dept_kogan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1710-0169
SPIN-code: 6300-3241
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Honored Scientist of Russia
Russian Federation, Rostov-on-DonVladimir P. Glukhov
Rostov State Medical University
Email: docc.gvp@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8486-9357
SPIN-code: 5702-6243
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, Rostov-on-DonMikhail G. Loskutov
Rostov State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: Mikhail-Loskutov1612@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2623-6137
SPIN-code: 5570-8104
MD
Russian Federation, Rostov-on-DonReferences
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 EDN: MRLXRI
- Ng K, Stenzl A, Sharma A, et al. Urinary biomarkers in bladder cancer: a review of the current landscape and future directions. Urol Oncol. 2021;39(1):41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.08.01 EDN: YNJCWD
- Dobruch J, Oszczudłowski M. Bladder cancer: current challenges and future directions. Medicina (Kaunas).2021;57(8):749. doi: 10.3390/medicina57080749 EDN: BVLIUL
- Rumyantsev AA, Bulychkin PV, Volkova MI, et al. Bladder cancer. Malignant Tumors. 2024;14(3S2–1):221–241. doi: 10.18027/2224-5057-2024-14-3s2-1.2-09 EDN: LRXBBA
- Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Shakhzadova AO. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2020 (morbidity and mortality). Moscow: P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; 2021. 252 p. (In Russ.) ISBN: 978-5-85502-268-1
- Kogan MI, Vasilyev ON. Retrospective analysis of the results of radical cystectomy in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Cancer Urology. 2012;1:43–48. EDN: OTORTB
- Gupta A, Lotan Y, Bastian PJ, et al. Outcomes of patients with clinical T1 grade 3 urothelial cell bladder carcinoma treated with radical cystectomy. Urology. 2008;71(2):302–307. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.04
- Shariat SF, Palapattu GS, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Discrepancy between clinical and pathologic stage: impact on prognosis after radical cystectomy. European Urology. 2007;51(1):137–149. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.05.021
- Pshikhachev AM, Mikhaleva LM, Gusniev MA, et al. Clinical and morphological features of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: implications for treatment, prognosis and relapse of the disease (literature review). Cancer Urology. 2021;17(1):134–141. doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-1-134-141 EDN: EEKHSR
- Kirkali Z, Chan T, Manoharan M, et al. Bladder cancer: epidemiology, staging and grading, and diagnosis. Urology. 2005;66(6 Suppl 1):4–34. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.062
- Oganyan VA, Gritskevich AA, Simonov AD, et al. Robot-assisted cystectomy with orthotopic vesicoplasty for bladder cancer. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2022;15(3):44–54. doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-3-44-54 EDN: LNSVNS
- Lowrance WT, Rumohr JA, Chang SS, et al. Contemporary open radical cystectomy: analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol. 2008;179(4): 1313–1318. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.084
- Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC, et al. Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol. 2009;55(1):164–174. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.031
- Katsimperis S, Tzelves L, Tandogdu Z, et al. Complications after radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with a meta-regression analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2023;9(6):920–929. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.05.002 EDN: JTZXHX
- Fonteyne V, Ost P, Bellmunt J, et al. Curative treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2018;73(1):40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.019
- Holzbeierlein J, Bixler BR, Buckley DI, et al. Treatment of non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer: AUA/ASCO/SUO Guideline (2017; amended 2020, 2024). J Urol. 2024;212(1):3–10. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003981 EDN: ZJFAON
- Holzbeierlein JM, Bixler BR, Buckley DI, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline: 2024 Amendment. J Urol. 2024;211(4):533–538. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003846 EDN: QHUYNZ
- Antonelli L, Sebro K, Lahmar A, et al. Association between antibiotic prophylaxis before cystectomy or stent removal and infection complications: a systematic review. Eur Urol Focus. 2023;9(4):631–636. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.01.012 EDN: PLRNIS
- Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. 2018;391(10139):2525–2536. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30996-6
- Sathianathen NJ, Pan HYC, Furrer M, et al. Comparison of robotic vs open cystectomy: a systematic review. Bladder Cancer. 2023;9(3):253–269. doi: 10.3233/BLC-220065 EDN: IYHRSK
- McNicholas DP, El-Taji O, Siddiqui Z, et al. Systematic review comparing uretero-enteric stricture rates between open cystectomy with ileal conduit, robotic cystectomy with extra-corporeal ileal conduit and robotic cystectomy with intra corporeal ileal conduit formation. J Robotic Surg. 2024;18(1):100. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01850-9 EDN: TYWPUS
- Vasilyev ON, Perepechay VA, Ryzhkin AV. Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: early and late postoperative complications. Urology Herald. 2019;7(2):24–50. doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2019-7-2-24-50 EDN: UODDFE
- Downey CL, Bainbridge J, Jayne DG, et al. Impact of in-hospital postoperative complications on quality of life up to 12 months after major abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2023;110(9):1206–1212. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad167 EDN: UECEAP
- Ginkel N, Meijer D, Boormans J, et al. Predictors of major complications and the association with oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a nationwide registry study. Medical Research Archives. 2003;11(6). doi: 10.18103/mra.v11i6.3978 EDN: TICERS
- Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Sjoberg DD, et al. Comparing open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2015;67(6):1042–1050. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043
- Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Marzouk KH, et al. Randomized trial comparing open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol. 2018;74(4):465–471. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.030
- Yuh BE, Nazmy M, Ruel NH, et al. Standardized analysis of frequency and severity of complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(5):806–813. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.007
- Johar RS, Hayn MH, Stegemann AP, et al. Complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol. 2013;64(1):52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.010
- Wijburg CJ, Michels CTJ, Oddens JR, et al. Robot assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer (RACE): study protocol of a non-randomized comparative effectiveness study. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):861. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4779-6 EDN: OKHNVS
- Catto JWF, Khetrapal P, Ricciardi F, et al. Effect of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy on 90-day morbidity and mortality among patients with bladder cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;327(21):2092–2103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.7393 EDN: LNHVZW
- Dell’Oglio P, Mazzone E, Lambert E, et al. The effect of surgical experience on perioperative and oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: evidence from a referral centre with extensive experience in robotic surgery. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;7(2):352–358. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.01.016 EDN: NEPMNZ
- Wijburg CJ, Hannink G, Michels CTJ, et al. Learning curve analysis for intracorporeal robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;39:55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.03.004 EDN: QKDDWQ
Supplementary files

