游离植皮术在消除儿童烧伤后颈部畸形中的特点
- 作者: Filippova O.V.1, Afonichev K.A.1
-
隶属关系:
- H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
- 期: 卷 9, 编号 1 (2021)
- 页面: 77-86
- 栏目: Exchange of experience
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/turner/article/view/41937
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PTORS41937
- ID: 41937
如何引用文章
详细
论证。文献广泛报道了颈部瘢痕挛缩重建整形手术的各种方法,从游离植皮术到扩张器手术和显微外科自体组织复合体移植。然而,很少注意采取保守措施来稳定手术治疗的结果。
目的:评价烧伤后颗粒状颈部创面游离皮移植术及消除瘢痕挛缩的远期效果,并分析效果不满意的原因;当使用基本的预防措施时,证明游离植皮在消除颈部挛缩的可能性。
材料与方法。2017年至2019年,46名颈部烧伤瘢痕后遗症患者在联邦州预算机构以H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Children’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery的损伤后遗症诊所接受治疗。将患者分为两组:第一组为自体游离皮移植颗粒状创面后颈部挛缩患者;第二组是经修复手术消除复发性颈挛缩的患者。
回顾性数据的分析使我们能够确定两组患者的预防康复措施的实际数量。为了确定挛缩的严重程度,采用了1973年的N.E. Povstyanii分类。
结果。最严重的颈部挛缩是III度和IV度发生在第一组患者(III度为41.2%)。第二组患者颈部伸展受限,分别为I度(33.3%)和II度(58.3%)。
第一组未采用固定和压缩治疗的保守预防措施。最常见的预防措施是使用具有抗瘢痕作用的局部药物。
两期自体全层皮肤植皮结合保守措施,完全消除I-IV度颈部挛缩,获得良好的美学效果。
结论。发生颈部挛缩的主要原因是自体皮肤的回缩,这不可避免地在缺乏充分的预防措施的情况下发生。
使用游离皮肤移植,结合预防性固定与Shants颈圈和加压半面罩消除颈部挛缩,可获得良好的功能和美学效果。
作者简介
Olga Filippova
H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: olgafil-@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1002-0959
SPIN 代码: 8055-4840
http://www.rosturner.ru/kl7.htm
MD, PhD, D.Sc.
俄罗斯联邦, 64-68 Parkovaya str., Pushkin, 196603, Saint PetersburgKonstantin Afonichev
H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
Email: afonichev@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6460-2567
SPIN 代码: 5965-6506
MD, PhD, D.Sc.
俄罗斯联邦, 64-68 Parkovaya str., Pushkin, 196603, Saint Petersburg参考
- Gnipov PA, Baindurashvili AG, Brazol’ MA, et al. Preimushchestva rannego hirurgicheskogo lecheniya glubokih ozhogov shei u detej. Ortopediya, travmatologiya I vosstanovitel’naya hirurgiya detskogo vozrasta. 2020;8(1):25–34. doi: 10.17816/PTORS16298. (In Russ.)
- Saaiq M, Zaib S, Ahmad S. The menace of post-burn contractures: a developing country’s perspective. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2012;25(3):152–158.
- Mody NB, Bankar SS, Patil A. Post burn contracture neck: clinical profile and management. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(10):NC12-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10187.5004
- Kurbanov UA, Davlatov AA, Dzhanobilova SM, Holov ShI. Hirurgicheskoe lechenie posleozhogovyh rubcov lica s kontrakturoj perioral'noj oblasti. Vestnik Avicenny. 2015;(3):7–15. (In Russ.)
- Vaganova NA. Novye hirurgicheskie sposoby lecheniya deformacij volosistoj chasti golovy, lica i shei s primeneniem ballonnogo rastyazheniya tkanej [dissertation]. Moscow; 2006. (In Russ.)
- Akita S, Hayashida K, Takaki S, et al. The neck burn scar contracture: a concept of effective treatment. Burns Trauma. 2017;5:22. doi: 10.1186/s41038-017-0086-8
- Seo D-K, Kym D, Hur J. Management of neck contractures by single-stage dermal substitutes and skin grafting in extensive burn patients. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014;87(5):253–259. doi: 10.4174/astr.2014.87.5.253
- Povstyanoj NE. Vosstanovitel’naya hirurgiya ozhogov. Moscow: Meditsina; 1973. (In Russ.)
- Karvayal KF, Parks DK. Ozhogi u detey. Moscow: Meditsina; 1990. (In Russ.)
- Paramonov BA, Porembskiy BA, Yablonskiy VG. Ozhogi. Rukovodstvodlyavrachey. Saint Petersburg: SpecLit; 2000. (In Russ.)
- DiVincenti FC, Curreri PW, Pruitt BA Jr. Use of mesh skin autografts in the burned patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;44(5):464–467.
- Raff T, Hartmann B, Wagner H Germann G. Experience with the modified. Meek technique. Acta ChirPlast. 1996;38(4):142–146.
- Lattari V, Jones LM, Varcelotti JR, et al. The use of a permanent dermal allograft in full-thickness burns of the hand and foot: a report of three cases. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1997;18(2):147–155. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199703000-00010
- DeBruler DM, Blackstone BN, McFarland KL, et al. Effect of skin graft thickness on scar development in a porcine burn model. Burns. 2018;44(4):917–930. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.11.011
补充文件
