The choice of pelvic osteotomy technique in young children with hip dysplasia
- Authors: Bortulev P.I.1, Baskaeva T.V.1, Vissarionov S.V.1,2, Barsukov D.B.1, Pozdnikin I.Y.1, Poznovich M.S.1, Baskov V.E.1, Kornyakov P.N.3
-
Affiliations:
- H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
- North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
- Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty
- Issue: Vol 11, No 1 (2023)
- Pages: 5-16
- Section: Clinical studies
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/turner/article/view/254910
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PTORS138629
- ID: 254910
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The choice of pelvic osteotomy in young children with late diagnosis of hip dysplasia most often depends on the experience and preferences of the surgeon, and the diagnosis of the degree of violation of the ratios is based on the generally accepted classification of hip dysplasia without considering possible variants of the deformation of the acetabulum. We hypothesized that the choice of the pelvic osteotomy technique in the surgical treatment of children with hip dysplasia of varying severity should be based on the variant of acetabulum deformation and the corrective capabilities of pelvic osteotomy.
AIM: This study aimed to compare and analyze the results of the surgical treatment of children with hip dysplasia of varying severity and to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed differentiated approach to the choice of the pelvic osteotomy technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 150 patients (150 hip joints) aged 2–4 years (3.1 ± 0.45) with grade II–IV hip dysplasia, according to the supplemented classification of Tönnis. Depending on the verified variant of acetabulum deformity and taking into account the corrective capabilities of various osteotomies, we divided the patients into three groups. All patients underwent conventional clinical and X-ray examinations. During radiometry, the following indicators were evaluated: acetabular index (AI), Wiberg angle, neck–shaft angle (NSA), anteversion angle of the proximal femur, degree of bone coverage, acetabulum depth (AD) and pelvic height, length of the acetabular arch (LAA), and presence or absence of a bone oriel (BO).
RESULTS: In the comparative analysis of the radiographic anatomical condition of the hip joint in children with hip dysplasia of varying severity, the differentiated use of the modified Salter pelvic osteotomy without autograft and pericapsular acetabuloplasty according to Pemberton and Pembersal surgery led to adequate correction of various variants of congenital acetabular deformity with approximately normal anatomy of the acetabulum and not lead to significant deformation of the hemipelvis, such as elongation.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the surgical treatment of young children with hip dysplasia of varying severity according to the proposed differentiated approach to the choice of the pelvic osteotomy technique, which is based on the variant of acetabulum deformation, indicate the achievement of adequate correction of congenital deformity of the acetabular component of the joint with the restoration of its anatomical structure and avoidance of secondary deformation of the hemipelvis. The effectiveness of the proposed approach to the choice of pelvic osteotomy technique in the treatment of young children with hip dysplasia of varying severity is confirmed by the changes in AI, Wiberg angle, AD, and PH, whose values became close to the individual norm (p > 0.05), and reduction of possible secondary deformities.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Pavel I. Bortulev
H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
Email: pavel.bortulev@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4931-2817
SPIN-code: 9903-6861
Scopus Author ID: 57193258940
MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgTamila V. Baskaeva
H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
Email: tamila-baskaeva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9865-2434
SPIN-code: 5487-4230
MD, Orthopedic and Trauma Surgeon
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgSergei V. Vissarionov
H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: vissarionovs@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4235-5048
SPIN-code: 7125-4930
Scopus Author ID: 6504128319
ResearcherId: P-8596-2015
MD, PhD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Corresponding Member of RAS
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint PetersburgDmitry B. Barsukov
H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
Email: dbbarsukov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9084-5634
SPIN-code: 2454-6548
MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgIvan Yu. Pozdnikin
H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
Email: pozdnikin@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7026-1586
SPIN-code: 3744-8613
MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgMakhmud S. Poznovich
H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
Email: poznovich@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2534-9252
SPIN-code: 1357-0260
MD, Research Associate
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgVladimir E. Baskov
H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
Email: dr.baskov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0647-412X
SPIN-code: 1071-4570
MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgPavel N. Kornyakov
Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty
Author for correspondence.
Email: pashat-1000@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7124-5473
MD, Orthopedic and Trauma Surgeon
Russian Federation, CheboksaryReferences
- Pekmezci M, Yazici M. Salter osteotomisi [Salter osteotomy: an overview]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2007;41:37–46.
- Pemberton PA. Pericapsular osteotomy of the ilium for treatment of congenital subluxation and dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1965;47:65–86.
- Dega W. Osteotomia trans-iliakalna w leczeniu wrodzonej dysplazji biodra [Transiliac osteotomy in the treatment of congenital hip dysplasia]. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 1974;39(5):601–613.
- McNerney NP, Mubarak SJ, Wenger DR. One-stage correction of the dysplastic hip in cerebral palsy with the San Diego acetabuloplasty: results and complications in 104 hips. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20(1):93–103.
- Berezhnoj AP, Morgun VA, Snetkov AI, et al. Acetabuloplastika v rekonstruktivnoj hirurgii ostatochnogo podvyviha bedra u podrostkov. In: Zabolevanija i povrezhdenija krupnyh sustavov u detej: Sb. nauch. rabot LNIITO im. G.I. Turnera. Leningrad;1989. P. 76–80. (In Russ.)
- Perlik PC, Westin GW, Marafioti RL. A combination pelvic osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(6):842–850.
- Bortulev PI, Baskaeva TV, Vissarionov SV, et al. Salter vs Pemberton: comparative radiologic analysis of changes in the acetabulum and pelvis after surgical correction in children with hip dysplasia. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2022;28(2):27–37. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/2311-2905-1748
- Tönnis D. Congenital dysplasia and dislocation of the hip in children and adults. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer–Verlag;1987.
- Ramo BA, De La Rocha A, Sucato DJ, et al. A new radiographic classification system for developmental hip dysplasia is reliable and predictive of successful closed reduction and late pelvic osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018;38(1):16–21. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000733
- Köroğlu C, Özdemir E, Çolak M, et al. Open reduction and Salter innominate osteotomy combined with femoral osteotomy in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: Comparison of results before and after the age of 4 years. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2021;55(1):28–32. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2021.17385
- Airey G, Shelton J, Dorman S, et al. The Salter innominate osteotomy does not lead to acetabular retroversion. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2021;30(6):515–518. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000821
- Esmaeilnejad-Ganji SM, Esmaeilnejad-Ganji SMR, Zamani M, et al. A newly modified salter osteotomy technique for treatment of developmental dysplasia of hip that is associated with decrease in pressure on femoral head and triradiate cartilage. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019. doi: 10.1155/2019/6021271
- Aydin A, Kalali F, Yildiz V, et al. The results of Pemberton’s pericapsular osteotomy in patients with developmental hip dysplasia. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(1):35–41. doi: 10.3944/aott.2012.2613
- Sarikaya B, Sipahioglu S, Sarikaya ZB, et al. The early radiological effects of Dega and Pemberton osteotomies on hip development in children aged 4–8 years with developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2018;27(3):250–256. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000469
- Wenger DR, Frick SL. Early surgical correction of residual hip dysplasia: the San Diego Children’s Hospital approach. Acta Orthop Belg. 1999;65(3):277–287.
- Wada A, Sakalouski A, Nakamura T, et al. Angulated Salter osteotomy in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2022;31(3):254–259. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000883
- Bursali A., Yıldırım T. Pembersal osteotomy. In: Pediatric pelvic and proximal femoral osteotomies. Ed. by R. Hamdy, N. Saran. Springer Cham; 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-78033-7_13
- Venkatadass K, Durga Prasad V, Al Ahmadi NMM, et al. Pelvic osteotomies in hip dysplasia: why, when and how? EFORT Open Rev. 2022;7(2):153–163. doi: 10.1530/EOR-21-0066
- Kamosko MM, Grigor’ev IV. Pelvic osteotomies at treatment of dysplastic hip pathology. Vestnik travmatologii i ortopedii im. N.N. Priorova. 2010;1:90–93. (In Russ.).
- Czubak J, Kowalik K, Kawalec A, et al. Dega pelvic osteotomy: indications, results and complications. J Child Orthop. 2018;12(4):342–348. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.12.180091
- Badrinath R, Bomar JD, Wenger DR, et al. Comparing the Pemberton osteotomy and modified San Diego acetabuloplasty in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Child Orthop. 2019;13(2):172–179.
- Krieg AH, Hefti F. Beckenosteotomie nach Dega und Pemberton [Acetabuloplasty – the Dega and Pemberton technique]. Orthopade. 2016;45(8):653–658. doi: 10.1007/s00132-016-3295-0
- Wu KW, Wang TM, Huang SC, et al. Analysis of osteonecrosis following Pemberton acetabuloplasty in developmental dysplasia of the hip: long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(11):2083–2094. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01320
- Plaster RL, Schoenecker PL, Capelli AM. Premature closure of the triradiate cartilage: a potential complication of pericapsular acetabuloplasty. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991;11(5):676–678.
- Bortulev PI, Baskaeva TV, Vissarionov SV, et al. Variants of acetabular deformity in developmental dysplasia of the hip in young children. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2023;29(1). doi: 10.17816/2311-2905-2012
- Tönnis D. Ischemic necrosis as a complication of treatment of C.D.H. Acta Orthop Belg. 1990; 56(1):195–206.
- Suvorov V, Filipchuk V. Salter pelvic osteotomy for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: assessment of postoperative results and risk factors. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022;14(4). doi: 10.52965/001c.35335
- Balioğlu MB, Öner A, Aykut ÜS, et al. Mid term results of Pemberton pericapsular osteotomy. Indian J Orthop. 2015;49(4):418–424. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.159627
- Bursali A, Tonbul M. How are outcomes affected by combining the Pemberton and Salter osteotomies? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(4):837–846. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0153-3
- Agarwal A, Rastogi P. Clinicoradiological outcomes following pembersal acetabular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of hip in young children: a series of 16 cases followed minimum 2 years. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101669
- M’sabah DL, Assi C, Cottalorda J. Proximal femoral osteotomies in children. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99:171–186. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.11.003
- Merckaert SR, Zambelli PY, Edd SN, et al. Mid- and long-term outcome of Salter’s, Pemberton’s and Dega’s osteotomy for treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hip Int. 2021;31(4):444–455. doi: 10.1177/1120700020942866
- Wang CW, Wu KW, Wang TM, et al. Comparison of acetabular anterior coverage after Salter osteotomy and Pemberton acetabuloplasty: a long-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(3):1001–1009. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3319-6
- Krieg AH, Hefti F. Beckenosteotomie nach Dega und Pemberton [Acetabuloplasty – the Dega and Pemberton technique]. Orthopade. 2016;45(8):653–658. doi: 10.1007/s00132-016-3295-0
- Domzalski M, Synder M, Drobniewski M. Long-term outcome of surgical treatment of developmental dyplasia of the hip using the Dega and Salter method of pelvic osteotomy with simultaneous intratrochanteric femoral osteotomy. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2004;6(1):44–50.
- McNerney NP, Mubarak SJ, Wenger DR. One-stage correction of the dysplastic hip in cerebral palsy with the San Diego acetabuloplasty: results and complications in 104 hips. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20(1):93–103.
- Dello Russo B, Candia Tapia JG. Comparison results between patients with developmental hip dysplasia treated with either salter or Pemberton osteotomy. Ortho Res Online J. 2017;1(4). doi: 10.31031/OPROJ.2017.01.000519
- Ezirmik N, Yildiz K. A biomechanical comparison between salter innominate osteotomy and Pemberton pericapsular osteotomy. Eurasian J Med. 2012;44(1):40–42. doi: 10.5152/eajm.2012.08
- Bhatti A, Abbasi I, Naeem Z, et al. A comparative study of salter versus Pemberton osteotomy in open reduction of developmental dysplastic hips and clinical evaluation on Bhatti’s functional score system. Cureus. 2021;13(1). doi: 10.7759/cureus.12626
- Gharanizadeh K, Bagherifard A, Abolghasemian M, et al. Comparison of Pemberton osteotomy and kalamchi modification of salter osteotomy in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Res Orthop Sci. 2020;7(4):169–174. doi: 10.32598/JROSJ.7.4.727.1
- Yonga Ö, Memişoğlu K, Onay T. Early and mid-term results of Tönnis lateral acetabuloplasty for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2022;33(1):208–215. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.397
Supplementary files
