Risks of microbial colonization in newborn born to mothers with chorioamnionitis
- Authors: Shevareva E.A.1,2, Savicheva A.M.1,3, Fedorova L.A.1, Shalepo K.V.1,3, Grinenko G.V.2, Nevmerzhitskaia O.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
- City Perinatal Center No. 1
- D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology
- Issue: Vol 13, No 4 (2022)
- Pages: 29-40
- Section: Original studies
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/pediatr/article/view/114927
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PED13429-40
- ID: 114927
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chorioamnionitis, or intra-amniotic infection, is an infection of the membranes and amniotic cavity caused by polymicrobial associations, including Streptococcus agalactiae (SGB), predominantly localised to the lower genital tract of women. The colonization of a infant with GBS occurs as a result of ascending infection from the mother, in the intranatal period during passage through the natural birth canal of the mother. Colonization of the skin and mucous membranes of the infant in the vast majority of cases proceeds without the clinical implementation of the infectious process, only 2-5% of infected newborns develop an infection associated with GBS.
AIM: The aim of the study is to investigate the vaginal and uterine microflora in women with chorioamnionitis and to determine the degree of neonatal colonization.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A microbiological examination was undertaken in 113 mother–child pairs. Main group (group I): pregnant women with full-term pregnancy (≥37 weeks’ gestation) who were diagnosed with clinical chorioamnionitis and prescribed antibacterial agents, and their newborns (n = 77). Comparison group (group II): 36 pregnant women without clinical chorioamnionitis with a gestational age of ≥37 weeks’ gestation and their newborns with a physiological course of the early neonatal period. Clinical specimens: secretions from the posterior vaginal fornix and the inner surface of the uterine wall at surgical delivery in women in labour with clinical signs of chorioamnionitis (group I) and without clinical manifestations of chorioamnionitis (group II). Material was obtained at the height of body temperature in group I and during the 1st period of labour in group II. The clinical materials were umbilical cord blood, skin surface of the occipital fold, discharge from the cavity, and discharge from the tracheobronchial tree (in case of respiratory therapy with ventilator therapy).
RESULTS: At bacteriological examination in women of Group I the frequency of microorganism isolation from the vaginal discharge was: Enterococcus faecalis — 31.8%, S. agalactiae (SGB) — 30.3% and Escherichia coli — 24.2%. The proportion of SGB at 106 CFU/ml was 70%. The proportion of E. coli at 106 CFU/ml was 75% and that of Candida albicans 72%. Among microorganisms isolated from the uterine cavity, the proportion of SGB at 106 CFU/ml was 60%, E. coli 100%. Bacteriological testing of the examined children showed that S. agalactiae (SGB), E. faecalis and E. coli were isolated from almost all neonatal loci studied. Comparative studies have shown that the colonisation of newborn infants was most frequently caused by S. agalactiae (SGB), E. faecalis and E. coli. The frequency of maternal transmission of these organisms to the foetus and the newborn is 100% for S. agalactiae (SGB) and 18–50% for E. faecalis and E. coli. In all examined children of the main group and with the presence of S. agalactiae (SGB) in the uterine cavity of their mothers (n = 5), these microorganisms were isolated from different loci (in all cases from the skin surface of the auricular fold and from oral discharge, and in three cases from umbilical cord blood), but clinical manifestations of the infection process did not develop in any child.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite antibiotic therapy for chorioamnionitis in women, the incidence of micro-organism isolation from both the vagina and the uterine cavity remains high. In most cases, newborns from mothers with chorioamnionitis colonised with micro-organisms, including S. agalactiae (SGB), do not develop a clinical picture of an infective process. Further research is needed to develop preventive measures in terms of perinatal and neonatal infections.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Ekaterina A. Shevareva
St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University; City Perinatal Center No. 1
Author for correspondence.
Email: Shevareva_E.A@mail.ru
applicant for the Departmentof Neonatology with Courses of Neurology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Postgraduate and Additional Professional Education; anesthesiologist, neonatologist, Neonatal Intensive Care unit
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint PetersburgAlevtina M. Savicheva
St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology
Email: savitcheva@mail.ru
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Microbiology; Head of the Department of Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint PetersburgLarisa A. Fedorova
St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Email: arslarissa@rambler.ru
MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Neonatology with Courses of Neurology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Postgraduate and Additional Professional Education
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgKira V. Shalepo
St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology
Email: 2474151@mail.ru
PhD, Senior Research Associate of the Laboratory of Microbiology; Associate Professor of the Department of Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint PetersburgGalina V. Grinenko
City Perinatal Center No. 1
Email: ggrinenko@mail.ru
MD, PhD, Сhief Medical Officer
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgOksana V. Nevmerzhitskaia
St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Email: ovnevmer@list.ru
MD, PhD, Deputy Chief Physicianfor Neonatology
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Ailamazyan EhK, Savicheva AM, Sokolovskii EV, et al. Infektsionno-vospalitel’nye zabolevaniya v akusherstve i ginekologii. Moscow: GEHОTAR-Media, 2016. 320 p. (In Russ.)
- Ivanov DO, Atlasov VO, Bobrov SA, et al. Rukovodstvo po perinatologii. Saint Petersburg: Inform-Navigator, 2015. 1216 p. (In Russ.)
- Assotsiatsiya spetsialistov i organizatsii laboratornoi sluzhby “Federatsiya laboratornoi meditsiny”. Mikrobiologicheskaya diagnostika infektsiy, vyzvannykh streptokokkom gruppy B u beremennykh i novorozhdennykh. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii. Moscow, 2016. 65 p. (In Russ.)
- mkb-10.com [Internet]. Mezhdunarodnaya klassifikatsiya boleznei 10-go peresmotra (MKB-10). Available at: https://mkb-10.com (In Russ.)
- Sadova NV, Zaplatnikov AL, Shipulina OYu, et al. Perinatal’naya infektsiya, vyzvannaya streptokokkami gruppy V. RMJ. 2010;18(1):25–27. (In Russ.)
- Shabalov NP, Ivanov DO. Neonatal sepsis. Pediatrics. Journal named after G.N. Speransky. 2003;82(5):46–56. (In Russ.)
- Shevareva EA, Fedorova LA, Nevmerzhitskaia OV. About the absence of the need to prescribe antibacterial therapy to newborns from mothers with clinical chorioamnionitis. Pediatrician (St. Petersburg). 2021; 12(3):5–14. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/PED1235-14
- Botet F, Figueras J, Carbonell-Estrany X, et al. Effect of maternal clinical chorioamnionitis on neonatal morbidity in very-low birth weight infants: a case-control study. J Perinat Med. 2010;38(3):269–273. doi: 10.1515/jpm.2010.029
- Czikk MJ, McCarthy FP, Murphy KE. Chorioamnionitis: from pathogenesis to treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(9):1304–1311. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03574.x
- Ericson JE, Laughon MM. Chorioamnionitis: implications for the neonate Jessica. Clin Perinatol. 2015;42(1): 155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2014.10.011
- Henriquez GMG, Rodrigo FGM. Chorioamnionitis and neonatal morbidity: current perspectives. Res Rep Neonatol. 2017;7:41–52. doi: 10.2147/RRN.S128751
- Kallapur SG, Presicce P, Rueda CM, et al. Fetal immune response to chorioamnionitis. Semin Reprod Med. 2014;32(1):56–67. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1361823
- Kwak D-W, Hwang H-S, Kwon J-Y, et al. Co-infection with vaginal Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis increases adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(4):333–337. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.818124
- Mendz GL, Kaakoush NO, Quinlivan JA. Bacterial aetiological agents of intra-amniotic infections and preterm birth in pregnant women. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3:58. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00058
- Menon R, Taylor RN, Fortunato SJ. Chorioamnionitis — a complex pathophysiologic syndrome. Placenta. 2010;31(2):113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.11.012
- Rodrigo FGM, Henriquez GG, Aloy JF, Perez AGA. Outcomes of very-low-birth-weight infants exposed to maternal clinical chorioamnionitis: a multicentre study. Neonatology. 2014;106(3):229–234. doi: 10.1159/000363127
- Romero R, Miranda J, Kusanovic JP, et al. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term I: microbiology of the amniotic cavity using cultivation and molecular techniques. J Perinat Med. 2015;43(1):19–36. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2014-0249
- Su B-H. Histological chorioamnionitis and neonatal outcome in preterm infants. Pediatr Neonatol. 2014; 55(2):154–155. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2013.08.007
- Tita ATN, Andrews WW. Diagnosis and management of clinical chorioamnionitis. Clin Perinatology. 2010;37(2):339–354. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2010.02.003
- Rodriguez-Trujillo A, Cobo T, Vives I, et al. Gestational age is more important for short-term neonatal outcome than microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity or intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(8):926–933. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12905
- Tudela CM, Stewart RD, Roberts SW, et al. Intrapartum evidence of early-onset group B streptococcus. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(3):626–629. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824532f6
- Zhu Y, Huang J, Lin XZ, Chen C. Group B streptococcus colonization in late pregnancy and invasive infection in neonates in China: a population-based 3-year study. Neonatology. 2019;115(4):301–309. doi: 10.1159/000494133
Supplementary files
