Predictors of Long-Term Complications of Femoropopliteal Bypass with Autovenous Graft
- Authors: Zakeryaev A.B.1, Vinogradov R.A.1,2, Sukhoruchkin P.V.1, Butayev S.R.1, Bakhishev T.E.2, Derbilov A.I.1, Urakov E.R.1, Baryshev A.G.1,2, Porkhanov V.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Research Institute ― Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1 named after Professor S. V. Ochapovsky
- Kuban State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 30, No 2 (2022)
- Pages: 213-222
- Section: Original study
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/pavlovj/article/view/96438
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PAVLOVJ96438
- ID: 96438
Cite item
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Atherosclerotic lesion of lower limb arteries often occurs with the development of chronic and later with critical ischemia of the lower limbs. Revascularization in these conditions has always been at the center of attention of vascular surgeons worldwide.
AIM: To analyze long-term complications after femoropopliteal bypass (FPB) with the autovenous graft.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective open study was conducted in Scientific the Research Institute — Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1 named after Professor S. V. Ochapovsky (Krasnodar) in the period from January 10, 2016, to December 25, 2019, and included 464 patients who underwent FPB with venous autograft. The following autovenous conduits were used: n = 266, reverse vein (great saphenous vein (GSV)); n = 59, autovein (GSV) prepared in situ; n = 66, autovein (GSV) prepared ex situ; and n = 73, veins of an upper limb. The long-term follow-up period was 16.6 ± 10.3 months.
RESULTS: During the postoperative hospital period, single cases of lethal outcome and myocardial infarction were noted. No ischemic strokes were recorded. Shunt thrombosis developed in 4.5% of the patients, and 2.1% required limb amputation. Postoperative wound revision caused by bleeding was performed in 1.7% of the cases. In the remote follow-up period, adverse cardiovascular events were noted in every fifth patient (21.8%). Shunt thrombosis was diagnosed in 17.4% of cases, and limb amputation was performed in 5.1% of the cases. To identify the factors for poor prognosis, the whole sample was divided to two groups: group 1 (n = 366) included those without long-term complications and group 2 (n = 99) comprised patients with long-term complications. Using the odds ratio (OR), the following predictors of adverse cardiovascular events were identified: degree I obesity (р < 0.0001; OR = 3.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.93–5.43), degree II obesity (р = 0.0005; ОR = 4.84; 95% CI = 1.71–13.67), and stage IIB chronic lower limb ischemia (CLLI) (р = 0.0006; ОR = 2.24; 95% CI = 1.42–3.52). Protective factors were postinfarction cardiosclerosis (р = 0.04; ОR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.27–0.95), excessive body mass (р = 0.01; ОR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.35–0.88), and stage IV CLLI (р = 0.01; ОR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.32–0.86).
CONCLUSIONS: FPB with venous autograft is characterized by a low frequency of complications in the hospital and long-term follow-up periods, making this technique a method of choice for the open surgical treatment of patients with extended atherosclerotic lesion of the superficial femoral artery. Predictors of adverse cardiovascular events in the long-term period are degree I obesity, degree II obesity, and stage IIB CLLI. Protective factors against the development of long-term surgical complications are postinfarction cardiosclerosis, overweight, and stage IV CLLI. The presented results should be considered when constructing stratification risk scales for adverse cardiovascular events in patients who underwent FPB. Precision management of patients with identified predictors of complications will allow the reduction of the risks for the development of these conditions and increase long-term survival free from shunt thrombosis and limb amputation.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Aslan B. Zakeryaev
Research Institute ― Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1 named after Professor S. V. Ochapovsky
Author for correspondence.
Email: a.zakeryayev@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4859-1888
SPIN-code: 6519-8918
Russian Federation, Krasnodar
Roman A. Vinogradov
Research Institute ― Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1 named after Professor S. V. Ochapovsky; Kuban State Medical University
Email: viromal@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9421-586X
SPIN-code: 7211-3229
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, Krasnodar; KrasnodarPavel V. Sukhoruchkin
Research Institute ― Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1 named after Professor S. V. Ochapovsky
Email: germak23rus@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5385-338X
Russian Federation, Krasnodar
Sultan R. Butayev
Research Institute ― Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1 named after Professor S. V. Ochapovsky
Email: dr.sultan@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7386-5986
Russian Federation, Krasnodar
Tarlan E. Bakhishev
Kuban State Medical University
Email: Tarlan.bakhishev@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4143-1491
SPIN-code: 9558-6940
Russian Federation, Krasnodar
Aleksandr I. Derbilov
Research Institute ― Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1 named after Professor S. V. Ochapovsky
Email: aderbilov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2915-8181
Russian Federation, Krasnodar
El'dar R. Urakov
Research Institute ― Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1 named after Professor S. V. Ochapovsky
Email: eldarurakov2013@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4948-5590
Russian Federation, Krasnodar
Aleksandr G. Baryshev
Research Institute ― Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1 named after Professor S. V. Ochapovsky; Kuban State Medical University
Email: a.barishev@icloud.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6735-3877
SPIN-code: 2924-1648
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, Krasnodar; KrasnodarVladimir A. Porkhanov
Research Institute ― Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1 named after Professor S. V. Ochapovsky
Email: vladimirporhanov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9401-4099
SPIN-code: 2446-5933
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Russian Federation, KrasnodarReferences
- Natsional’nyye rekomendatsii po diagnostike i lecheniyu zabolevaniy arteriy nizhnikh konechnostey. Moscow; 2019 Available at: http://www.angiolsurgery.org/library/recommendations/2019/recommendations_LLA_2019.pdf. Accessed: 2022 January 14. (In Russ).
- Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2007;45(Suppl S):S5–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.037
- ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis And Treatment Of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, In Collaboration With The European Society For Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2018;(8):164–221. (In Russ). doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2018-8-164-221
- Pokrovsky AV, Dan VN, Zotikov AE, et al. Femoro-popliteal bypass above popliteal fossa with PTFE graft: which graft diameter is better? Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2008;14(4):105–8. (In Russ).
- Zakeryaev AB, Vinogradov RA, Matusevich VV, et al. Femoral-popliteal bypass surgery: from its origins to the present day. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center. 2021;16(3):57–60. (In Russ). doi: 10.25881/20728255_2021_16_3_57
- Suсhoruchkin PV, Skrypnik DA, Korotun AA, et al. Autovenous bifurcated graft in situ for treatment of infection of aorto-femoral bifurcated prosthesis. Infektsii v Khirurgii. 2020;18(3–4):31–3. (In Russ).
- Sukovatykh BS, Belikov LN, Sukovatykh MB, et al. The choice of femoropopliteal bypass surgery below the knee joint gap. Annals of Surgery. 2016;21(5):312–20. (In Russ). doi: 10.18821/1560-9502-2016-21-5312-320
- Gavrilenko AV, Skrylev SI. A comparative analysis of long-term outcomes of femoropoplietal autovenous bypass “in situ” grafting and the reversed vein. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2007;13(3):120–4. (In Russ).
- Bockeriya LA, Temrezov MB, Kovalenko VI, et al. Khirurgicheskoye lecheniye bol’nykh s aterotromboticheskim porazheniyem arteriy nizhnikh konechnostey – vybor transplantata pri bedrenno-podkolennom shchuntirovanii. Annals of Surgery. 2010;(2):5–8. (In Russ).
- Kazakov IuI, Lukin IB, Velikov PG, et al. The choice of reconstruction technique of infrainguinal arterial segment in patients with chronic critical limb ischemia. Kardiologiya i Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya. 2014;7(6):42–8. (In Russ).
- Burkov NN, Kazantsev AN, Anufriev AI, et al. Femoropopliteal reconstruction with 'KemAngioprotez' biological prosthesis. Kardiologiya I Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya. 2020;13(1):29–35. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/kardio202013011129
- Lutsenko VA, Sultanov RV, Evtushenko AV, et al. Results of infrainguinal reconstructions with distal anastomosis below the knee joint fissure in patients with critical ischemia when using various prosthetic materials. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2021;10(S2):45–9. (In Russ). doi: 10.17802/2306-1278-2021-10-2S-45-49
- Arhuidese I, Hicks CW, Locham S, et al. Long-term outcomes after autogenous versus synthetic lower extremity bypass in patients on hemodialysis. Surgery. 2017;162(5):1071–9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.04.026
- Krepkogorskiy NV, Ignatiev IM, Bredikhin RA, et al. First experience of autovenous femoropoplietal bypass surgery in situ using original method of ligation of venous tributaries. Kardiologiya i Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya. 2021;14(5):386–91. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/kardio202114051386
- Barbarash LS, Ivanov SV, Zhuravleva IYu, et al. Twelve-year experience of bioprosthesis implantation into infrainguinal arteries. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2006;12(3):91–7. (In Russ).
- Tishchenko IS, Zolkin VN, Maksimov NV, et al. Two-year results of infrainguinal reconstructions using autovenous shunts and xenografts. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2016;22(4):130–6. (In Russ).
- Ivchenko AO, Shvedov AN, Ivchenko OA, et al. Use of bioprosthesis with external support by knitted nitinol mesh as a conduit in infrainguinal bypass surgery: randomized controlled trial. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2017;2(6):114–7. (In Russ). doi: 10.12737/article_5a0a8a77c92410.82422845
- Сhlebov VF. Prognosis of thrombosis after surgical intervention on aorta-femoral and femoral-knee segments. Regionarnoe Krovoobraŝenie i Mikrocirkulâciâ. 2002;1(3):14–8. (In Russ).
- Burkov NN, Burkova TV, Veremeev AV, et al. Metabolic and genetic predictors of restenosis and thrombosis of arterial bioprostheses in the femoropopliteal position. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2013;19(3):131–6. (In Russ).
- Kasyanov BV. Searching for the optimal predictors’ model for occlusion of the femoral-popliteal and femoral-tibial bypasses. RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2019;23(3):271–82. (In Russ). doi: 10.22363/2313-0245-2019-23-3-271-282
- Nazarenko MS, Sleptcov AA, Lebedev IN, et al. Genomic structural variations for cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidity. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:41268. doi: 10.1038/srep41268
- Sedykh DYu, Kazantsev AN, Tarasov RS, et al. Predictors of Progressive Course of Multifocal Atherosclerosis in Patients With Myocardial Infarction. Kardiologiia. 2019;59(5):36–44. (In Russ). doi: 10.18087/cardio.2019.5.10257
- Kazantsev AN, Tarasov RS, Burkov NN, et al. Progression of precerebral atherosclerosis and predictors of ischemic complications in cardiac surgery patients. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2020;(7):31–8. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202007131
- Katel’nitskiy II, Zor’kin AA, Drozhzhin EV, et al. Povysheniye komplayentnosti terapii u bol’nykh s sindromom kriticheskoy ishemii nizhnikh konechnostey i sakharnym diabetom. Moskovskiy Khirurgicheskiy Zhurnal. 2018;(S3):113–4. (In Russ).
Supplementary files
