Influence of Timing of Stenting on Condition of Venous Valves of Lower Extremities, Frequency and Severity of Development of Post-Thrombotic Disease
- Authors: Boyarintsev V.V.1, Barinov E.V.1,2, Pankov A.S.2, Barinov V.E.1,2, Bazarova M.B.1,2, Zhuravlev S.V.1,2, Zolotukhin I.A.3
-
Affiliations:
- Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs
- Clinical Hospital No. 1 (Volynskaya) of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation
- N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
- Issue: Vol 32, No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 235-242
- Section: Original study
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/pavlovj/article/view/260172
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PAVLOVJ630006
- ID: 260172
Cite item
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities (LE) is a life-threatening condition, accompanied by high rates of disability among people of working age. Despite early detection of DVT and the use of recommended antithrombotic therapy, damage to the venous wall, development of valvular reflux and post-thrombotic disease (PTD) inevitably occur. The clinical picture of PTD becomes evident after the development of valve incompetence, which leads to vertical venous reflux and chronic venous hypertension. Timely elimination of venous obstruction can preserve the functionality of valve structures, which will subsequently help reduce the frequency and severity of PTD.
AIM: To evaluate the impact of the timing of stenting on the condition of the venous valves, the frequency and severity of the development of PTD in patients with acute DVT of LE.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective interventional study included 49 patients with acute iliofemoral thrombosis. After selective thrombolysis, 25 patients underwent early (within 7 days) and 24 patients underwent delayed (7–30 days) stenting. The incidence and severity of PTD was assessed on the Villalta scale at 3, 6 and 12 months. The effect of treatment on the condition of the venous valves of the LE was assessed at 12 months. On ultrasound examination, reflux was assessed using a scoring system.
RESULTS: At 12 months, 2 (8%), 13 (52%), and 10 (40%) patients who underwent delayed stenting, developed severe, moderate, or mild PTD, respectively. In the early stenting group, 6 (25%) patients had no symptoms of PTD, 15 (62.5%) and 3 (12.5%) developed mild and moderate PTD, respectively (p = 0.0005). At 12 months, in the early stenting group, the absence of reflux was recorded in 6 (25%) patients, 4 (17%) patients had valve reflux in the femoral segment, and 14 (58%) in the popliteal segment. In the delayed stenting group, valvular incompetence of both segments was detected in 12 (48%) patients; in 4 (16%) and 9 (36%) patients, the valves of the femoral and popliteal veins were preserved; there were no patients without reflux in both segments. Treatment results for this indicator were better if early stenting was performed (p = 0.0005).
CONCLUSION: Early stenting after selective thrombolysis in patients with proximal DVT of LE leads to a decrease in the incidence and severity of symptoms of PTD, and can reduce the incidence of reflux in the deep veins.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Valeriy V. Boyarintsev
Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs
Email: wpx@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9707-3262
SPIN-code: 2491-7199
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowEvgeniy V. Barinov
Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs; Clinical Hospital No. 1 (Volynskaya) of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: dr.ev.barinov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-2311-0637
SPIN-code: 9423-3640
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow
Aleksey S. Pankov
Clinical Hospital No. 1 (Volynskaya) of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation
Email: pancaver2004@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8616-0678
SPIN-code: 4830-3377
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowVictor E. Barinov
Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs; Clinical Hospital No. 1 (Volynskaya) of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation
Email: vicbarin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0434-2484
SPIN-code: 1981-6745
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowMekhridzhamal B. Bazarova
Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs; Clinical Hospital No. 1 (Volynskaya) of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation
Email: mehri.68@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-5882-8122
SPIN-code: 3212-6536
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowSergey V. Zhuravlev
Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs; Clinical Hospital No. 1 (Volynskaya) of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation
Email: volynka@volynka.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4335-0329
SPIN-code: 9046-6156
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowIgor' A. Zolotukhin
N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: zoloto70@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6563-0471
SPIN-code: 3426-2981
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Kahn SR. The post-thrombotic syndrome. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2016;2016(1):413–8. doi: 10.1182/ashedu cation-2016.1.413
- Villalta S, Bagatella P, Piccioli A, et al. Assessment of validity and reproducibility of a clinical scale for the post-thrombotic syndrome. Haemostasis. 1994;24:158a.
- Nyamekye I, Merker L. Management of proximal deep vein thrombosis. Phlebology. 2012;27(Suppl 2):61–72. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2012.012s37
- Plate G, Ohlin P, Eklöf B. Pulmonary embolism in acute ilio- femoral venous thrombosis. Br J Surg. 1985;72(11):912–5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800721123
- Young T, Tang H, Hughes R. Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2010(2): CD006212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd006212.pub4
- Douketis JD, Crowther MA, Foster GA, et al. Does the location of thrombosis determine the risk of disease recurrence in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis? Am J Med. 2001;110(7):515–9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00661-1
- Kahn SR, Shrier I, Julian JA, et al. Determinants and time course of the postthrombotic syndrome after acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(10):698–707. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-10-200811180-00004
- Vedantham S, Thorpe PE, Cardella JF, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for the treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis with use of endovascular thrombus removal. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(Suppl 7):S227–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.016
- Galanaud JP, Kahn SR. Postthrombotic syndrome: a 2014 update. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2014;29(6):514–9. doi: 10.1097/hco.0000000000000103
- Segal JB, Streiff MB, Hofmann LV, et al. Management of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review for a practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(3):211–22. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-3-200702060-00150
- Kuperin AS, Gusev LL, Alukhanyan OA, et al. Endovascular Management of Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis. Journal of Venous Disorders. 2024;18(1):64–71. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/flebo20241801164
- Enden T, Haig Y, Kløw N–E, et al.; CaVenT Study Group. Long-term outcome after additional catheter-directed thrombolysis versus standard treatment for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (the CaVenT study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9810):31–8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61753-4
- Haig Y, Enden T, Grøtta O, et al.; CaVenT Study Group. Post-thrombotic syndrome after catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis (CaVenT): 5-year follow-up results of an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 2016;3(2):e64–71. doi: 10.1016/s2352-3026(15)00248-3
- Seliverstov EI, Lobastov KV, Ilyukhin EA, et al. Prevention, Diagnostics and Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis. Russian Experts Consensus. Journal of Venous Disorders. 2023;17(3):152–296. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/flebo202317031152
- Comerota AJ, Kearon C, Gu CS, et al.; ATTRACT Trial Investigators. Endovascular Thrombus Removal for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis. Circulation. 2019;139(9):1162–73. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.118.037425
- Johnson BF, Manzo RA, Bergelin RO, et al. Relationship between changes in the deep venous system and the development of the postthrombotic syndrome after an acute episode of lower limb deep vein thrombosis: a one- to six-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 1995; 21(2):307–13. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70271-7
- Shull KC, Nicolaides AN, Fernandes é Fernandes J, et al. Significance of popliteal reflux in relation to ambulatory venous pressure and ulceration. Arch Surg. 1979;114(11):1304–6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370350106012
- Gaibov AD, Nematzoda O, Rakhmonov DK, et al. Endovascular Recanalization Methods in Treatment of Chronic Lower Limb Ischemia: Modern State of Problem. I. P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2023;31(2):305–16. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/PAVLOVJ107324
- Gritsanchuk AM, Bezlepko AV, Muslimov BH, et al. Ischemic Stroke with Dissection of Vessel: Features of Course, Diagnosis and Treatment (Case Report). Nauka Molodykh (Eruditio Juvenium). 2024;12(1):101–10. (In Russ). doi: 10.23888/HMJ2024121101-110
Supplementary files
