Clinical application of the developed device for wound closure after radical mastectomy
- Authors: Vorontsov AY.1, Lukoyanychev EE2, Izmaylov SG2, Izmaylov AG3, Martynov ED2
-
Affiliations:
- Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncology Center
- City Clinical Hospital №7 n.a. E.L. Berezov
- Kazan State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 100, No 3 (2019)
- Pages: 505-510
- Section: Clinical experiences
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/kazanmedj/article/view/13360
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/KMJ2019-505
- ID: 13360
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Aim. To improve the results of treatment of patients with breast cancer after radical mastectomy through the development and application of a device for wound closure after radical mastectomy, providing favorable conditions for wound healing.
Methods. The proposed device for wound closure after radical mastectomy was used in 42 patients after the mandatory informed consent. A patent for the invention was obtained for the developed device. The study group included patients with indications for performing Madden mastectomy (Halsted, Patey) for breast cancer in the range of stages T1-4N0-1M0. The age of the patients was 57.5±10.4 (m±δ) years. In group 1 (n=21), wound closure after radical mastectomy was performed using the developed device, in group 2 (n=21) - without it.
Results. In the process of working with the developed device, the following positive features were observed. The magnitude of the buckling in the plane of the jaws follows the contour of the thorax in the region of operation of the patient preventing the appearance of the plots of overpressure by the device to the adjacent tissue and ensuring uniformity of traction paravulnar tissues. The complete absence of tissue tension in the area of the suture is the result of the suturing of surgical wounds only after the complete wound edges attachment by means of the device. The above-mentioned factors lead to the formation of point scars in the joints, the absence of extended forms of postoperative scars.
Conclusion. The developed device for wound closure after radical mastectomy performed for breast cancer allows shortening the hospital stay after surgery by 36% (p=0.01) and the deadline for removal of drainage by 31% (p=0.01), reducing the incidence of local necrosis of the flap (p=0.44) compared to traditional suturing of the wounds.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
A Yu Vorontsov
Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncology Center
Email: izmailov_alex@mail.ru
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
E E Lukoyanychev
City Clinical Hospital №7 n.a. E.L. Berezov
Email: izmailov_alex@mail.ru
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
S G Izmaylov
City Clinical Hospital №7 n.a. E.L. Berezov
Email: izmailov_alex@mail.ru
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
A G Izmaylov
Kazan State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: izmailov_alex@mail.ru
Kazan, Russia
E D Martynov
City Clinical Hospital №7 n.a. E.L. Berezov
Email: izmailov_alex@mail.ru
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
References
- Sostoyaniye onkologicheskoy pomoshchi naseleniyu Rossii v 2017 godu. (The state of oncological care for the population of Russia in 2017.) Ed. by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, G.V. Petrova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena. 2018; 236 р. (In Russ.)
- Kvasha E.A., Khar'kova T.L. Statistical demographic analysis of mortality from breast cancer in Russia. Voprosy statistiki. 2006; (8): 25–33. (In Russ.)
- Xie Y., Lv X., Luo C. et al. Surgery of the primary tumor improves survival in women with stage IV breast cancer in Southwest China: A retrospective analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96 (22): e7. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000007048.
- Yarygin M.L., Obmanov I.V., Yarygin L.M. et al. Postmastectomy syndrome after the radical treatment of the breast cancer with the preservation of the intercostal nerve. Khirurgiya. 2013; (8): 25–27. (In Russ.)
- Volchenko A.A., Pak D.D., Chissov V.I. The choice of reconstructive operation in the treatment of patients with breast cancer. Khirurgiya. 2013; (8): 18–24. (In Russ.)
- Podgayskiy V.N., Batyukov D.V., Serbenkov S.V. et al. Breast reconstruction: evidence-based choice. Meditsinskaya panorama. 2002; (4): 23–25. (In Russ.)
- Privalov A.V. Complications of combined treatment of malignant neoplasms and analysis of their interconnection. Izvestiya Chelyabinskogo nauchnogo tsentra. 2003; (3): 125–131. (In Russ.)
- Thomas A., Khan S.A., Chrischilles E.A., Schroeder M.C. Initial surgery and survival in stage IV breast cancer in the United States, 1988–2011. JAMA Surg. 2016; 151 (5): 424–431. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4539.
- Smith D., Thomson K., Bambra C., Todd A. The breast cancer paradox: A systematic review of the association between area-level deprivation and breast cancer screening uptake in Europe. Cancer Epidemiol. 2019; 60: 77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.03.008.
- Muzaffar M., Kachare S., Vohra N. Impact of primary tumor surgery in stage IV male breast cancer. Clin. Breast Cancer. 2017; 17 (3): e143–e149. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.11.001.
- Kurozumi S., Matsumoto H., Kurosumi M. et al. Prognostic significance of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes for oestrogen receptor-negative breast cancer without lymph node metastasis. Oncol. Lett. 2019; 17 (3): 2647–2656. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.9938.
- Grushina T.I. Reabilitatsiya v onkologii: fizioterapiya. (Rehabilitation in oncology: physiotherapy.) Moscow: GEOTAR-Media. 2006; 240 р. (In Russ.)
- Force J., Leal J.H.S., McArthur H.L. Checkpoint blockade strategies in the treatment of breast cancer: Where we are and where we are heading. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 2019; 20 (4): 35. doi: 10.1007/s11864-019-0634-5.
- Heinz B.Jr., Christian J.G. Plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. 1st edition. Georg Thieme Verlag. 1997; 179–192.
- Petit J.Y., Veronesi U., Orecchia R. et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intraoperative radiotherapy (ELIOT): a new type of mastectomy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2006; 96: 47. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9033-7.
- Chukhrienko D.Yu. Atlas operatsiy na molochnoy zheleze. (Atlas of breast surgery.) Kiev: Zdorov'yz. 1971; 128 р. (In Russ.)
- Kozlov S.V. Belokonev V.I., Kochetkov R.I. et al. Method of wound closure after radical mastectomy. Patent for invention №2239371 issued on 10.11.2004. (In Russ.)
- Izmaylov G.A., Orenburov P.Ya., Dyatlov E.E., Izmaylov S.G. Device for wound edges attachment. Author's certificate 1387999 SSSR, MKI A61V 17/04. Applied on 05.05.1986; issued on 15.04.1988. Otkrytiya. Izobreteniya. 1988; (14): 27. (In Russ.)
- Topuzov V.S., Zinchenko-Gladkikh V.D., Logvinova Zh.I. et al. Device for wound edges attachment. Author's certificate 1131501 SSSR, MKI A61V 17/02. Applied on 16.09.1983; issued on 07.05.2013. Otkrytiya. Izobreteniya. 1984; (48): 6. (In Russ.)
- Johani B.A., Malik O.A., Anwar E. et al. Reply to «Letter to the Editor Concerning the Article-Impact of Surgery on Survival in Stage IV Breast Cancer». Breast J. 2016; 22 (6): 678–682. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12701.
- Vorontsov A.Yu., Lukoyanychev E.E., Izmaylov S.G. Device for wound closure after radical mastectomy. Patent for invention №2547695 RF. Byull. №23 issued on 10.04.2015. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
