Clinical and Functional Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Multivisceral Surgery With Pancreaticoduodenectomy
- Authors: Egorov V.I.1,2,3, Kotelnikov A.G.1, Patyutko Y.I.1, Akhmetzyanov F.S.2,3, Podluzhnyi D.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
- Kazan State Medical University
- Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary named after prof. M.Z. Sigal
- Issue: Vol 106, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 367-374
- Section: Theoretical and clinical medicine
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/kazanmedj/article/view/311404
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/KMJ636265
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LNNPLA
- ID: 311404
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multivisceral procedures involving pancreaticoduodenectomy are associated with postoperative complications that worsen the general condition of patients, hinder specialized treatment initiation, and increase treatment-related risks.
AIM: To investigate the clinical and functional characteristics of patients undergoing multivisceral surgery with pancreaticoduodenectomy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 251 patients who underwent multivisceral resection with pancreaticoduodenectomy (group 1) for tumors of various localizations between January 2011 and April 2024 at two institutions: National Medical Research Center of Oncology, named after N.N. Blokhin, and Republican Clinical Oncological Dispansery, named after Prof. M.Z. Sigal. The control group comprised 832 patients who underwent standard-volume pancreaticoduodenectomy (group 2) at the same institutions during the same period. The patients’ sex, age, ECOG performance status, ASA physical status classification, body mass index, comorbidities, tumor-related complications, and characteristics of the pancreatic remnant, which are major determinants of postoperative complications, were evaluated. Continuous variables are described using the median and lower and upper quartiles (Q1–Q3). Categorical variables are presented as absolute numbers and percentages. The continuous variables of the two groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Comparison of percentage distributions in 2×2 contingency tables was performed using Pearson’s χ² test. Differences were considered significant at p <0.05.
RESULTS: Group 1 had a significantly higher proportion of patients with ECOG scores of 2 (30.3 vs. 8.7%, p <0.001) and 3 (4.4 vs. 0.7%, p <0.001), a lower prevalence of obesity (8.8 vs. 15.7%), and fewer elderly patients (38.6 vs. 54.6%). Anemia (38.2 vs. 10.2%, p <0.001), tumor-related stenosis (19.5 vs. 2.5%, p <0.001), and enteric fistula or peritumoral abscess (10.4 vs. 0.6%, p <0.001) were significantly more common in group 1, whereas obstructive jaundice was more frequent in group 2 (47.8 vs. 69.5%, p <0.001). The pancreatic duct diameter was significantly smaller in group 1 (0.3 mm [0.2–0.4] vs. 0.4 mm [0.2–0.5], p <0.001), whereas pancreatic parenchymal density did not significantly differ between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing multivisceral surgery that includes pancreaticoduodenectomy represent a clinically more complex cohort with poorer overall functional status compared with those undergoing standard pancreaticoduodenectomy without adjacent organ resection.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Vasily I. Egorov
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology; Kazan State Medical University; Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary named after prof. M.Z. Sigal
Author for correspondence.
Email: drvasiliy21@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6603-1390
SPIN-code: 7794-4210
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Lecturer, Depart. of Oncology, Radiation Diagnostics and Radiation Therapy, Oncologist, oncology Depart. No. 11
Russian Federation, Moscow; 49 Butlerova st, Kazan, 420012; KazanAleksey G. Kotelnikov
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Email: kotelnikovag@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2811-0549
SPIN-code: 8710-4003
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Leading research associate, Oncology Depart. of Abdominal Oncology No. 2
Russian Federation, MoscowYury I. Patyutko
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Email: mikpat@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9254-1346
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Chief Researcher, Oncology Depart. of Abdominal Oncology No. 2
Russian Federation, MoscowFoat Sh. Akhmetzyanov
Kazan State Medical University; Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary named after prof. M.Z. Sigal
Email: akhmetzyanov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4516-1997
SPIN-code: 8908-4761
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Head of Depart., Department of Oncology, Radiation Diagnostics and Radiation Therapy, Head of the Surgical Clinic LDK2
Russian Federation, 49 Butlerova st, Kazan, 420012; KazanDanil V. Podluzhnyi
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Email: danil-p@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7375-3378
SPIN-code: 3537-3436
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Head of the Oncology Depart. of Abdominal Oncology No. 2
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Jin P, Liu H, Ma FH, et al. Retrospective analysis of surgically treated pT4b gastric cancer with pancreatic head invasion. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(29):8718–8728. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8718 EDN: PMGYSG
- Cojocari N, Crihana GV, Bacalbasa N, et al. Right-sided colon cancer with invasion of the duodenum or pancreas: A glimpse into our experience. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(6):1378. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10813 EDN: QUKJXM
- Yan XL, Wang K, Bao Q, et al. En bloc right hemicolectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy for right-sided colon cancer invading duodenum. BMC Surg. 2021;21(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01286-0 EDN: XOQVPK
- Giuliani T, Di Gioia A, Andrianello S, et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy associated with colonic resections: indications, pitfalls, and outcomes. Updates Surg. 2021;73(2):379–390. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-00996-7 EDN: GPRAYS
- Mizuno T, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Major hepatectomy with or without pancreatoduodenectomy for advanced gallbladder cancer. Br J Surg. 2019;106(5):626–635. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11088
- Patyutko YuI, Kudashkin NE, Kotelnikov AG. Surgical treatment of locally advanced cancer of the right half of the colon. Pelvic surgery and oncology. 2014;(2):28–32. EDN: SMGDTB
- Meng L, Huang Z, Liu J, et al. En bloc resection of a T4B stage cancer of the hepatic flexure of the colon invading the liver, gall bladder, and pancreas/duodenum: A case report. Clin Case Rep. 2020;8(12):3524–3528. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.3455 EDN: JQEVNO
- Zhu R, Grisotti G, Salem RR, Khan SA. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for locally advanced colon cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0755-7 EDN: AFKLFN
- Makuuchi R, Irino T, Tanizawa Y, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for gastric cancer. Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment. 2018;4:26. doi: 10.20517/2394-4722.2018.15
- Roberts P, Seevaratnam R, Cardoso R, et al. Systematic review of pancreaticoduodenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15 Suppl 1:S108–15. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0086-5 EDN: YDMKJB
- D’Souza MA, Valdimarsson VT, Campagnaro T, et al; E-AHPBA scientific and research committee. Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy — a controversial treatment for bile duct and gallbladder cancer from a European perspective. HPB. 2020;22(9):1339–1348. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.12.008 EDN: CAFNZM
- Khalili M, Daniels L, Gleeson EM, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes for locally advanced right colon cancers: A systematic review. Surgery. 2019;166(2):223–229. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.04.020
- Bosscher MR, van Leeuwen BL, Hoekstra HJ. Current management of surgical oncologic emergencies. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0124641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124641
- Friziero A, Sperti C, Riccio F, et al. Surgical oncological emergencies in octogenarian patients. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1268190. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1268190 EDN: PQNUSE
- Skorus U, Rapacz K, Kenig J. The significance of comorbidity burden among older patients undergoing abdominal emergency or elective surgery. Acta Chir Belg. 2021;121(6):405–412. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2020.1816671 EDN: TCJAIQ
- Das B, Fehervari M, Hamrang-Yousefi S, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with right hemicolectomy for advanced malignancy: a single UK hepatopancreaticobiliary centre experience. Colorectal Dis. 2023;25(1):16–23. doi: 10.1111/codi.16303 EDN: HHTXRO
- Solaini L, de Rooij T, Marsman EM, et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy with colon resection for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. HPB. 2018;20(10):881–887. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.03.017
- Azam F, Latif MF, Farooq A, et al. Performance Status Assessment by Using ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Score for Cancer Patients by Oncology Healthcare Professionals. Case Rep Oncol. 2019;12(3):728–736. doi: 10.1159/000503095
- Gugenheim J, Crovetto A, Petrucciani N. Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. Updates Surg. 2022;74(1):35–42. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01186-1 EDN: UCTVJY
- Chen JB, Luo SC, Chen CC, et al. Colo-pancreaticoduodenectomy for locally advanced colon carcinoma-feasibility in patients presenting with acute abdomen. World J Emerg Surg. 2021;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00351-6 EDN: OYBJWL
- Grewal K, Varner C. The emergency department is no place to be told you have cancer. CMAJ. 2024;196(18):E626–E627. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.240612 EDN: ZIBWJL
- Egorov VI, Akhmetzyanov FS, Kaulgud HA, Ruvinskiy DM. Clinical case of multivisceral en bloc resection for locally advanced cancer of the colon hepatic flexure. Kazan Medical Journal. 2024;105(4):669–676. doi: 10.17816/KMJ628774 EDN: IZFEIL
- Hipp J, Rist L, Chikhladze S, et al. Perioperative risk of pancreatic head resection-nomogram-based prediction of severe postoperative complications as a decisional aid for clinical practice. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022;407(5):1935–1947. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02426-z EDN: VRBHSJ
- Angrisani M, Sandini M, Cereda M, et al. Preoperative adiposity at bioimpedance vector analysis improves the ability of Fistula Risk Score (FRS) in predicting pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Pancreatology. 2020;20(3):545–550. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.01.008 EDN: JQZVRN
- Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, et al. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2013;216(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002
Supplementary files
