Vaping-associated mechanisms in the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is compelling evidence of the negative impact of vaping on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems. However, its effects on the gastrointestinal tract remain understudied.

AIM: The study aimed to assess the impact of vaping on the functional state of the gastroesophageal zone in healthy individuals compared with patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS: The study included 90 participants divided into three groups of 30 individuals each. Group 1 consisted of individuals with no gastrointestinal disorders who had been regularly vaping for more than 12 months. Group 2 included patients with GERD. Group 3 (control group) comprised healthy individuals with no harmful habits. Clinical manifestations of reflux syndrome were assessed using validated questionnaires. Participants underwent 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring, and serum levels of gastrin and motilin were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn test. Fisher exact test was used for comparing qualitative variables, whereas Spearman correlation coefficient was applied for dependency assessment. The significance threshold was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS: In Group 2 (GERD), a low pH level in the lower esophagus and a high daily frequency of all types of reflux episodes were recorded. Compared with the control group, patients in group 2 had lower serum motilin levels (83.2 [56.9; 99.3] pg/mL vs 189.7 [117.6; 362.3] pg/mL, p = 0.001). Vapers had a more pronounced reflux syndrome compared with healthy individuals, with an increased daily number of acidic (54 [39.5; 71] vs 21.5 [18; 28.8], p = 0.001) and weakly acidic (7.5 [4.3; 9.8] vs 2 [1; 3], p = 0.001) reflux episodes, along with a decrease in esophageal pH levels (4.7 [4.1; 5.9] vs 6.7 [6.2; 6.8], p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Vaping is associated with an increased number of gastroesophageal reflux episodes, likely due to the suppression of lower esophageal sphincter motility, and may contribute to the development of GERD.

About the authors

Aleksey E. Shklyaev

Izhevsk State Medical Academy

Email: shklyaevaleksey@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2281-1333
SPIN-code: 3537-8929

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), prof., depart. of faculty therapy with courses in endocrinology and hematology

Russian Federation, 281 Kommunarov street, 426056 Izhevsk

Valery M. Dudarev

Izhevsk State Medical Academy

Author for correspondence.
Email: izhstalfanat@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5840-461X
SPIN-code: 4125-1073

assistant Lecturer, depart. of faculty therapy with courses in endocrinology and hematology

Russian Federation, 281 Kommunarov street, 426056 Izhevsk

Angelina S. Pantyukhina

Izhevsk State Medical Academy

Email: pantyukhina1985@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-3352-0907
SPIN-code: 1547-1776

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), assistant Lecturer, depart. of faculty therapy with courses in endocrinology and hematology

Russian Federation, 281 Kommunarov street, 426056 Izhevsk

Yulia I. Galikhanova

Izhevsk State Medical Academy

Email: galihanova_julia@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0005-4925
SPIN-code: 9837-6638

Postgrad. Stud., depart. of faculty therapy with courses in endocrinology and hematology

Russian Federation, 281 Kommunarov street, 426056 Izhevsk

References

  1. Podzolkov VI, Vetluzhskaya MV, Abramova AA, et al. Vaping and vaping-associated lung injury: A review. Terapevticheskii Arkhiv. 2023;95(7):591–596. doi: 10.26442/00403660.2023.07.202293
  2. Makarova IA, Akatova EV, Nikolin OP, Ivanova OS. Vaping is a bad habit or subculture. Narcology. 2024;23(2):60–78. doi: 10.25557/1682-313.2024.02.60-78
  3. David A Savitz. Invited commentary: the epidemiology of electronic cigarettes and reproductive health begins. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(3):362–364. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa066
  4. Li X, Yuan L, Wang F. Health outcomes of electronic cigarettes. Chin Med J. 2024;137(16):1903–1911. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003098
  5. Skotsimara G, Antonopoulos AS, Oikonomou E, et al. Cardiovascular effects of electronic cigarettes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26(11):219–1228. doi: 10.1177/2047487319832975
  6. Lyzwinski LN, Naslund JA, Miller CJ, Eisenberg MJ. Global youth vaping and respiratory health: epidemiology, interventions, and policies. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2022;32(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s41533-022-00277-9
  7. Pasricha TS, Kochar B. Vaping-associated esophagitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021;21(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01695-8
  8. Yan Z, Xu Y, Li K, Liu L. Genetic correlation between smoking behavior and gastroesophageal reflux disease: insights from integrative multi-omics data. BMC Genomics. 2024;25(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10536-3
  9. Runge TM, Abrams JA, Shaheen NJ. Epidemiology of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2015;44(2):203–31. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2015.02.001
  10. Ivashkin VT, Maev IV, Trukhmanov AS, et al. Recommendations of the Russian Gastroenterological Association in Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2020;30(4):70–97. doi: 10.22416/1382-4376-2020-30-4-70-97
  11. Ivashkin VT, Maev IV, Trukhmanov AS, Rumyantseva DE. Modern achievements in the diagnosis and treatment of the refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2018;90(8):4–12. EDN: XVYHEL doi: 10.26442/terarkh20189084-12
  12. Kaybysheva VO, Kucheryavy Yu A, Trukhmanov AS, et al. Results of a multicenter observational study on the use of the international GerdQ questionnaire for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2013;23(5):15–23. (In Russ.) EDN: RFLZYR
  13. Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, et al. Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0. Gut. 2024;73(2):361–371. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330616
  14. Braverman AS, Vegesna AK, Miller LS, et al. Pharmacologic specificity of nicotinic receptor-mediated relaxation of muscarinic receptor precontracted human gastric clasp and sling muscle fibers within the gastroesophageal junction. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011;338(1):37–46. doi: 10.1124/jpet.110.177097
  15. Mori H, Verbeure W, Tanemoto R, et al. Physiological functions and potential clinical applications of motilin. Peptides. 2023;160:170905. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2022.170905
  16. Kuznetsova EI, Rymareva EA, Dicheva DT, Andreev DN. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and diabetes mellitus: pathophysiological mechanisms of comorbidity. Consilium Medicum. 2019;21(8):23–28. doi: 10.26442/20751753.2019.8.190497
  17. Shklyaev AE, Shutova AA, Kazarin DD, et al. Influence of blood motylin concentration on clinical symptomatics of functional dyspepsy. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2022;(9):58–64. doi: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-205-9-58-64

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

© 2025 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).