Prognostic significance of the microbial factor in patients with miscarriage in early pregnancy registration
- Authors: Beliaeva N.R.1, Budilovskaya O.V.1, Khusnutdinova T.А.1, Krysanova A.А.1, Shalepo K.V.1, Savicheva A.M.1, Tapilskaya N.I.1, Kogan I.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
- Issue: Vol 73, No 6 (2024)
- Pages: 32-43
- Section: Original study articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/jowd/article/view/281031
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD636525
- ID: 281031
Cite item
Abstract
Background: The role of the microbial factor in the genesis of early miscarriages (up to 10 weeks of pregnancy) has not been established. However, disruption of the vaginal microbiota may be associated with the occurrence of late miscarriage.
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of early and late miscarriages and to determine the prognostic significance of the microbial factor in early pregnancy registration.
Materials and methods: This study involved 113 pregnant women registered before 10 weeks of gestation, who were divided into two study groups. Group I consisted of 22 women whose pregnancy ended in miscarriage before 22 weeks (subgroup IA of 19 patients with early miscarriage and subgroup IB of three patients with late miscarriage). Group II comprised 91 women whose pregnancy ended in term delivery. Vaginal microflora was investigated using microscopic and molecular biological methods.
Results: The frequency of miscarriages among the examined women was 20.4%. The proportion of early miscarriages was 86.4% and late miscarriages 13.6%. In Group I, the number of births in the anamnesis was higher than in Group II. The average rate of births per woman was 2.0 in Group I and 0.9 in Group II (p = 0.037); the number of previous pregnancy loss per woman was 1.2 in Group I and 0.5 in Group II (p = 0.019). Lactobacilli were detected in the vaginal biotope of all pregnant women. Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus crispatus were the most frequently occurring species. In subgroup IA and Group II, opportunistic pathogenic microorganisms were detected with equal frequency at first pregnancy examination and did not alter the existing vaginal microbiocenosis. In subgroup IB, Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae, Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Mycoplasma hominis or Ureaplasma spp. were detected simultaneously in early pregnancy, with Lactobacillus cristatus predominating.
Conclusions: The proportion of early miscarriages was six times higher than that of late miscarriages. We have not found an association between the quantitative and qualitative compositions of vaginal microorganisms in the first trimester of pregnancy and early miscarriages. The microbial factor was established to be important in late miscarriages. Further studies are needed to assess the prognosis of late miscarriages at the time of pregnancy registration.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Natalia R. Beliaeva
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Author for correspondence.
Email: natascha778@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4277-1474
SPIN-code: 4126-3035
MD
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgOlga V. Budilovskaya
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: o.budilovskaya@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7673-6274
SPIN-code: 7603-6982
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgTatiana А. Khusnutdinova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: husnutdinovat@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2742-2655
SPIN-code: 9533-9754
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAnna А. Krysanova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: krusanova.anna@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4798-1881
SPIN-code: 2438-0230
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgKira V. Shalepo
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: 2474151@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3002-3874
SPIN-code: 2527-7198
Cand. Sci. (Biology)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAlevtina M. Savicheva
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: savitcheva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3870-5930
SPIN-code: 8007-2630
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgNatalya I. Tapilskaya
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: tapnatalia@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5309-0087
SPIN-code: 3605-0413
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgIgor Yu. Kogan
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: ikogan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7351-6900
SPIN-code: 6572-6450
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Quenby S, Gallos ID, Dhillon-Smith RK, et al. Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. Lancet. 2021;397(10285):1658–1667. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00682-6
- Chaudhry K, Tafti D, Carlson K, et al. Anembryonic pregnancy. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
- Cohain JS, Buxbaum RE, Mankuta D. Spontaneous first trimester miscarriage rates per woman among parous women with 1 or more pregnancies of 24 weeks or more. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1620-1
- Sheshukova NA, Borovkova EI., Bolshakova OV. Etiopathogenic options of spontaneous miscarriage. Gynecology. 2014;16(2):84–88. EDN: SGROVN
- Daher S, Mattar R, Gueuvoghlanian-Silva BY, et al. Genetic polymorphisms and recurrent spontaneous abortions: an overview of current knowledge. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;67(4):341–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2012.01123.x
- Patki A, Chauhan N. An epidemiology study to determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with recurrent spontaneous miscarriage in India. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016;66(5):310–315. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0682-0
- Lipatov IS, Tezikov YV, Tyutyunnik VL, et al. Prophylaxis of early reproductive losses. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;(1):24–32. EDN: XVFQMH doi: 10.18565/aig.2017.1.24-32
- Kiecka A, Macura B, Szczepanik M. Can Lactobacillus spp. be a factor reducing the risk of miscarriage? Pol J Microbiol. 2021;70(4):431–446. doi: 10.33073/pjm-2021-043
- Donders GG, Van Calsteren K, Bellen G, et al. Predictive value for preterm birth of abnormal vaginal flora, bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis during the first trimester ofpregnancy. BJOG. 2009;116(10):1315–1324. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02237.x
- Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(Suppl 1):4680–4687. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002611107
- France MT, Ma B, Gajer P, et al. VALENCIA: a nearest centroid classification method for vaginal microbial communities based on composition. Microbiome. 2020;8(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00934-6
- Smith SB, Ravel J. The vaginal microbiota, host defence and reproductive physiology. J Physiol. 2017;595(2):451–463. doi: 10.1113/JP271694
- Grewal K, Lee YS, Smith A, et al. Chromosomally normal miscarriage is associated with vaginal dysbiosis and local inflammation. BMC Med. 2022;20(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02227-7
- Shahid M, Quinlivan JA, Peek M, et al. Is there an association between the vaginal microbiome and first trimester miscarriage? A prospective observational study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022;48(1):119–128. doi: 10.1111/jog.15086
- Saadaoui M, Singh P, Ortashi O, Al Khodor S. Role of the vaginal microbiome in miscarriage: exploring the relationship. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1232825. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1232825
- Dobrokhotova YE, Shadrova PA. Features in diagnostics of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women and its risks for reproduction. Medical Opponent. 2022;2(18):22–27. EDN: SNUMLH
- Nelson DB, Bellamy S, Nachamkin I, et al. First trimester bacterial vaginosis, individual microorganism levels, and risk of second trimester pregnancy loss among urban women. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(5):1396–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.035
- Bespalova ON, Kogana IYu, Abashova EI, et al. Early reproductive losses: a guide for doctors. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2024. 464 p. (In Russ.) EDN: EIWUFJ doi: 10.33029/9704-7905-6-RRP-2024-1-464
- Ma X, Wu M, Wang C, et al. The pathogenesis of prevalent aerobic bacteria in aerobic vaginitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a narrative review. Reprod Health. 2022;19(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01292-8
- Nigro G, Mazzocco M, Mattia E, et al. Role of the infections in recurrent spontaneous abortion. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(8):983–989. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.547963
- Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Miscarriage (spontaneous abortion). Clinical guidelines. 2021. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/670_1
- Savicheva AM, Sokolovskij EV, Domejka M. Procedure for conducting microscopic examination of smears of the urogenital tract: guidelines for attending physicians. Saint Petersburg: N-L Publishing House; 2007. 59 p. (In Russ.) EDN: YOZZTN
- Radzinskij VE, Savicheva AM, Vorobev S, et al. Vaginal biocenosis. Norm. Disorders. Recovery. Moscow: StatusPraesens, 2023. 360 p. (In Russ.)
- Savicheva AM. Modern ideas about the laboratory diagnosis of reproductively significant infections in women of reproductive age. Expert opinion. Issues of Practical Colposcopy. Genital Infections. 2022;(3):34–39. EDN: AOJKJT doi: 10.46393/27826392_2022_3_34
- Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(2):297–301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.2.297-301.1991
- Sherrard J, Wilson J, Donders G, et al. 2018 European (IUSTI/WHO) International Union against sexually transmitted infections (IUSTI) World Health Organisation (WHO) guideline on the management of vaginal discharge. Int J STD AIDS. 2018;29(13):1258–1272. doi: 10.1177/0956462418785451
- Sukhikh GT, Serov VN, Hoffman BL, et al. Gynecology according to Williams. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2023. 1280 p. EDN: KPGPOF doi: 10.33029/9704-7645-1-WGY-2023-1-1280
- Di Simone N, Santamaria Ortiz A, Specchia M, et al. Recent insights on the maternal microbiota: impact on pregnancy outcomes. Front Immunol. 2020;11:528202. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.528202
- Gupta P, Singh MP, Goyal K. Diversity of vaginal microbiome in pregnancy: deciphering the obscurity. Front Public Health. 2020;8:326. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00326
- Beljaeva NR, Budilovskaja OV, Savicheva AM, et al. Vaginal microbiota stability as a marker of successful outcomes of pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2023;72(4):71–80. EDN: NANWCX doi: 10.17816/JOWD117519
- Witkin SS. Vaginal microbiome studies in pregnancy must also analyse host factors. BJOG. 2019;126(3):359. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15300
- Foschi C, Salvo M, Cevenini R, et al. Vaginal lactobacilli reduce neisseria gonorrhoeae viability through multiple strategies: an in vitro study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:502. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00502
- Ñahui Palomino RA, Zicari S, Vanpouille C, et al. Vaginal Lactobacillus inhibits HIV-1 replication in human tissues ex vivo. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:906. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00906
- Chen H, Min S, Wang L, et al. Lactobacillus modulates chlamydia infectivity and genital tract pathology in vitro and in vivo. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:877223. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.877223.
- Stoyancheva G, Marzotto M, Dellaglio F, et al. Bacteriocin production and gene sequencing analysis from vaginal Lactobacillus strains. Arch Microbiol. 2014;196(9):645–653. doi: 10.1007/s00203-014-1003-1
- De Gregorio PR, Parolin C, Abruzzo A, et al. Biosurfactant from vaginal Lactobacillus crispatus BC1 as a promising agent to interfere with Candida adhesion. Microb Cell Fact. 2020;19(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01390-5
- Mls J, Stráník J, Kacerovský M. Lactobacillus iners-dominated vaginal microbiota in pregnancy. ČeskaGynekol. 2019;84(6):463–467.
- Dunlop AL, Satten GA, Hu YJ, et al. Vaginal microbiome composition in early pregnancy and risk of spontaneous preterm and early term birth among African American Women. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:641005. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.641005
- Zheng N, Guo R, Yao Y, et al. Lactobacillus iners is associated with vaginal dysbiosis in healthy pregnant women: a preliminary study. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:6079734. doi: 10.1155/2019/6079734
- Gryaznova M, Kozarenko O, Smirnova Y, et al. Cervical and vaginal microbiomes in early miscarriages and ongoing pregnancy with and without dydrogesterone usage. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(18):13836. doi: 10.3390/ijms241813836
- Gudnadottir U, Debelius JW, Du J, et al. The vaginal microbiome and the risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):7926. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12007-9
- Kindinger LM, Bennett PR, Lee YS, et al. The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk. Microbiome. 2017;5(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0223-9
- Duarte G, Linhares IM, Kreitchmann R, et al. Vulvovaginitis in pregnant women. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024;46:e-FPS03. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024FPS03
- Oganyan KA, Krysanova AA, Savicheva AM, et al. Bacterial vaginosis as a factor associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2023;72(6):129–138. EDN: DVIRKS doi: 10.17816/JOWD474063
- Kenfack-Zanguim J, Kenmoe S, Bowo-Ngandji A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of maternal and fetal outcomes among pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023;289:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.08.013
- Bhakta V, Aslam S, Aljaghwani A. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: prevalence and outcomes in a tertiary care hospital. Afr J Reprod Health. 2021;25(1):49–55. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2021/v25i1.6
- Donders GGG, Bellen G, GrincevicieneS, et al. Aerobic vaginitis: nolonger a stranger. Res Microbiol. 2017;168(9–10):845-858. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2017.04.004
- Disha T, Haque F. Prevalence and risk factors of vulvovaginal candidosis during pregnancy: a review. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2022;2022:6195712. doi: 10.1155/2022/6195712
- Pirtea P, Cicinelli E, De Nola R, et al. Endometrial causes of recurrent pregnancy losses: endometriosis, adenomyosis, and chronic endometritis. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(3):546–560. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.12.010
- Petricevic L, Domig KJ, Nierscher FJ, et al. Characterisation of the vaginal Lactobacillus microbiota associated with preterm delivery. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5136. doi: 10.1038/srep05136
- Kervinen K, Kalliala I, Glazer-Livson S, et al. Vaginal microbiota in pregnancy: role in induction of labor and seeding the neonate’’s microbiota? J Biosci. 2019;44(5):116.
- Sinyakova AA, Shipitsyna EV, Budilovskaya OV, et al. Vaginal microbiota in the first trimester of pregnancy in women with a history of miscarriage. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2018;67(5):32–41. EDN: YPHWXB doi: 10.17816/JOWD67532-41
Supplementary files
