Dynamic monitoring of the endothelium function in pregnant women at high risk of preeclampsia during pathogenetic prevention of its development

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Today, preclinical diagnosis of preeclampsia presents significant difficulties. In widespread practice, it is diagnosed based on existing clinical signs and laboratory and functional research methods. Most of them are invasive and expensive, which makes it difficult to use them in widespread clinical practice for diagnosis and, especially, for monitoring the effectiveness of therapy over the dynamics of the disease. It is known that the pathogenesis of preeclampsia can have two independent development paths, converging in a common resulting link — the formation of endothelial dysfunction. Methods for studying endothelial function include determining markers of its imbalance in blood samples and non-invasive functional tests. Non-invasive diagnosis of endothelial dysfunction using the EndoPAT test allows us to quantify endothelium-mediated changes in vascular tone during 5-minute occlusion of the brachial artery.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the method for determining the endothelium function in the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy during ongoing pathogenetic prevention of preeclampsia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This interventional uncontrolled study of the effectiveness of preventing preeclampsia using non-invasive assessment of vascular endothelial dysfunction during pregnancy was conducted at the Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott, St. Petersburg, Russia. The study involved 108 pregnant women at high risk of developing preeclampsia. All pregnant women underwent a cuff test to determine endothelial dysfunction using the peripheral arterial tonometry technique on the Endo-PAT 2000 device. The dynamic study was carried out in the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy. As a result of the study, when endothelial dysfunction was detected [logarithmic transformation of reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index (LnRHI) less 0.51], a complex glycosaminoglycan was additionally added to the basic prophylaxis with acetylsalicylic acid at a dosage of 250 MU (one capsule three times a day for eight weeks), then a cuff test was monitored after 6–12 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 20 software. All tests for significance were two-tailed, and differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.

RESULTS: Endothelial dysfunction was detected in the first trimester in 59 (55%) patients, then during ongoing complex therapy in the second trimester (n = 72) in 46 (64%) patients and in the third trimester (n = 46) in 4 (1%) patients. Moderate preeclampsia in the third trimester (35–39 weeks of gestation) developed in 28 (25.9%) patients out of 108. At the same time, at the start of the study, 15 patients with endothelial dysfunction received complex therapy, and 13 individuals only took acetylsalicylic acid. Among 46 patients who observed the dynamics of the entire pregnancy, only 4 (8.7%) women developed preeclampsia. After complex treatment prescribed based on the first trimester parameters, out of 36 patients who discontinued complex therapy and did not undergo a functional test subsequently, preeclampsia developed in 16 (44.4%) women. In the second trimester, out of 26 patients who stopped complex therapy, preeclampsia developed in 8 (30.8%) people. Thus, constant monitoring and complex therapy reduced the frequency of preeclampsia. In the group with a history of preeclampsia, the disease developed in 13 (39.4%) women. In the group with a high risk of preeclampsia according to the results of combined prenatal screening in the first trimester, with the exception of a history of preeclampsia (blood pressure test, placental growth factor level in the blood serum, lowest uterine artery pulsatility index value calculated to assess the individual risk of preeclampsia with a titer less than 1 : 100), preeclampsia occurred in 4 (13.3%) women. In the group with extragenital pathology associated with the risk of preeclampsia, including obesity, pregestational diabetes mellitus, chronic arterial hypertension, and chronic kidney disease, with the exception of a history of preeclampsia and a high risk of preeclampsia according to the results of perinatal screening, preeclampsia occurred in 11 (24.4%) women. In the high–risk groups for preeclampsia, we identified the highest-risk group, namely, one with the presence of preeclampsia in the anamnesis.

CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of the functional method for determining endothelial dysfunction in the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy during pathogenetic prevention of preeclampsia has been proven.

About the authors

Tatyana B. Postnikova

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Author for correspondence.
Email: ptb20@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8227-2629
SPIN-code: 5354-4640

MD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Elena V. Mozgovaya

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: elmozg@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6460-6816
SPIN-code: 5622-5674

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Elena V. Shipitsyna

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: shipitsyna@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2309-3604
SPIN-code: 7660-7068

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Olga V. Pachuliia

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: for.olga.kosyakova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4116-0222
SPIN-code: 1204-3160

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Olesya N. Bespalova

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: shiggerra@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6542-5953
SPIN-code: 4732-8089

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Igor Yu. Kogan

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: ikogan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7351-6900
SPIN-code: 6572-6450

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Vlasov TD, Lazovskaya OA, Shimanski DA, et al. The endothelial glycocalyx: research methods and prospects for their use in endothelial dysfunction assessment. Regional blood circulation and microcirculation. 2020;19(1):5–16. EDN: YVHFXQ doi: 10.24884/1682-6655-2020-19-1-5-16
  2. Ivanova OYu, Ponomareva NA, Aleksashkina KA, et al. Characteristics of blood flow in the fetal venous duct during pregnancy complicated by pre-eclampsia. Russian Bulletin of the Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2019;19(4):53–57. EDN: SRGYIG doi: 10.17116/rosakush20191904153
  3. Dikke GB, Pustotina OA, Ostromensky VV. Prophylaxis of placental insufficiency and other complications of gestation in women with diseases associated with endothelial dysfunction. Medical alphabet. 2019;3(25):37–42. EDN: EDPQJF doi: 10.33667/2078-5631-2019-3-25(400)-37-42
  4. Kuznetsova IV. Role of preconception endothelial dysfunction in development of obstetric complications. Medical alphabet. 2019;1(1):53–58. EDN: VWLDJA doi: 10.33667/2078-5631-2019-1-1(376)-53-58
  5. Yupatov EYu, Kurmanbaev TE, Timoshkova YL. Understanding endothelial function and dysfunction: state-of-the-art (a review). Russian Medical Journal. 2022;30(3):20–23. EDN: ZTKYFP
  6. Mikhailova YuV, Shechter MS. Expression of endothelial dysfunction as objective criterion of severity of preeclampsia. Health and education in the XXI century. 2023;5(3):84–89. EDN: YNTHXG doi: 10.26787/nydha-2686-6838-2023-25-3-84-89
  7. Vlasov TD, Petrischev NN, Lazovskaya OA. Endothelial dysfunction. Do we understand this term properly? Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation. 2020;17(2):76–84. EDN: EQEPOI doi: 10.21292/2078-5658-2020-17-2-76-84
  8. Shcherbakov VI, Pozdniakov IM, Shirinskaya AV. Study of the factors inducing dysfunction of endothelium at preeclampsia. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2017;23(2):96–101. EDN: YOATRF doi: 10.17116/repro201723296-101
  9. Seksenova AB, Nurgalieva LI, Kistaubaeva LT, et al. Severe preeclampsia: are there opportunities for early diagnosis on an outpatient basis Newsletter KAZNMU. 2022(1):56–59. EDN: OAMXVO doi: 10.53065/kaznmu.2022.37.88.008
  10. Navolockaya VK, Liashko ES, Shifman EM, et al. Possibilities for prediction of preeclampsia complications (a review). Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2019;25(1):87–96. EDN: PEBBOH doi: 10.17116/repro20192501187
  11. Postnikova TB, Mozgovaya EV. Current biophysical and biochemical predictors of preeclampsia. Women’s health and reproduction. 2022;(3):88–101. EDN: QOCTBV
  12. Gabidullina RI, Ganeeva AV, Shigabutdinova TN. Predictors of preeclampsia. Screening and prophylaxis in the i trimester of pregnancy. Gynecology. 2021;5(23):128–131. EDN: MZDXYO doi: 10.26442/20795696.2021.5.201213
  13. Vashukova ES, Glotov AS, Baranov VS. MicroRNAs associated with preeclampsia. Genetics. 2020;56(1):5–20. (In Russ.) EDN: TLHLVT doi: 10.31857/S0016675819080162
  14. Kapustin RV, Chepanov SV, Prokhorova VS. Dynamic study of preeclampsia markers in the second half of gestation in patients from high-risk groups. Issues of gynecology, obstetrics and perinatology. 2024;23(2):24–37. EDN: SCCIFM doi: 10.20953/1726-1678-2024-2-24-37
  15. Kapustin RV, Kashcheeva TK, Shelaeva EV. Prediction of preeclampsia and fetal development delay in the first trimester in pregnant women from high-risk groups: which models are better? // Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2023;72(5):15–28. EDN: UHWZWL doi: 10.17816/JOWD567815
  16. Andreeva MD, Balayan IS, Karakhalis LY. Early prediction of preeclampsia: the reality of today. Obstetrics and gynecology: news, opinions, training. 2023;11(1):19–27. EDN: BRQANS doi: 10.33029/2303-9698-2023-11-1-19-27
  17. Kudryavceva EV, Kovalev VV, Bayazitova NN, et al. Analysis of the effectiveness of aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia and alternative methods of prevention. Ural Medical Journal. 2021;20(1):70–75. EDN: BEHUJB doi: 10.52420/2071-5943-2021-20-1-70-75
  18. Kuznetsova IV, Gavrilova EA. Clinical experience of endothelial dysfunction correction at the stage of preparation for pregnancy in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Effective pharmacotherapy. 2020;16(28):36–40. EDN: AGGLLW doi: 10.33978/2307-3586-2020-16-28-36-40
  19. Kuznetsova IV. Role of preconception endothelial dysfunction in development of obstetric complications. Medical alphabet. 2019;1(1):53–58. EDN: VWLDJA doi: 10.33667/2078-5631-2019-1-1(376)-53-58
  20. Terekhina VYu, Nikolaeva MG, Momot AP, et al. Delayed endothelial dysfunction in patients with a history of early pre-eclampsia and features of pregravidary preparation. Bulletin of Medical Science. 2022;3(27). EDN: QVGUGL doi: 10.31684/25418475_2022_3_65
  21. Mozgovaya EV, Postnikova TB, Arzhanova ON, et al. Identification of gestosis (preeclampsia) risk and evaluation of efficiency of its prevention by means of noninvasive measurement of endothelial function. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2015;64(3):58–68. EDN: TZXFNJ doi: 10.17816/JOWD64358-68

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Endothelial dysfunction dynamics in women with a high risk of developing preeclampsia receiving complex therapy in all the study groups (McNemar’s test)

Download (141KB)
3. Fig. 2. Frequency of endothelial dysfunction in the first, second and third trimester of pregnancy and the occurrence of preeclampsia (PE) in women in the group 1

Download (425KB)
4. Fig. 3. Frequency of endothelial dysfunction in the first, second and third trimester of pregnancy and the occurrence of preeclampsia (PE) in women in the group 2

Download (427KB)
5. Fig. 4. Frequency of endothelial dysfunction in the first, second and third trimester of pregnancy and the occurrence of preeclampsia (PE) in women in the group 3

Download (424KB)
6. Fig. 5. ROC analysis of logarithmic transformation of reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index (LnRHI) capability of determining the risk of preeclampsia. The optimal threshold value is 0.51

Download (161KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Eсо-Vector



Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».