Perinatal outcomes after ART with transfer of cryopreserved embryos
- 作者: Kravchuk Y.N.1, Kalugina A.S.2
-
隶属关系:
- I. I. Mechnikov North-West State Medical University
- AVA-PETER Clinic
- 期: 卷 62, 编号 1 (2013)
- 页面: 48-54
- 栏目: Articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/jowd/article/view/2584
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD62148-54
- ID: 2584
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
作者简介
Yana Kravchuk
I. I. Mechnikov North-West State Medical University
Email: ynkravchuk@mail.ru
Postgraduate Student at the Department of Female Reproductive Health
Alla Kalugina
AVA-PETER Clinic
Email: Kalugina-AS@avaclinic.ru
Deputy Head Doctor for Reproductive Medicine
参考
- Вейсман А. Перенос криоэмбрионов // Проблемы репродукции. — 2010. — Т. 16, N 2. — С. 34–40.
- Birth characteristics and perinatal outcome of babies conceived from cryopreserved embryos / Wada I. [et al.] // Hum. Reprod. — 1994. — Vol. 9, N 3. — P. 543–546.
- Comparison of the major malformation rate of children conceived from cryopreserved embryos and fresh embryos / Li H. [et al.] // Chin. Med. J. — 2010. — Vol. 123, N 14. — P. 1893–1897.
- Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection / Shih W. [et al.] // Hum. Reprod. — 2008. — Vol. 23, N 7. — P. 1644–1653.
- In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: infant outcome after different IVF fertilization methods / Kallen B. [et al.] // Fertil. Steril. — 2005. — Vol. 84, N 3. — P. 611–617.
- In vitro fertilization is associated with an increase in major birth defects / Olson C. K. [et al.] // Fertil. Steril. — 2005. — Vol. 84, N 5. — P. 1308–1315.
- In vitro fertilization in Sweden: child morbidity including cancer risk / Kallen B. [et al.] // Fertil. Steril. — 2005. — Vol. 84, N 3. — P. 605–610.
- In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: risk for congenital malformations after different IVF methods / Kallen B. [et al.] // Birth Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Teratol. — 2005. — Vol. 73, N 3. — P. 162–169.
- Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: The Danish National Cohort Study 1995–2006 /Pinborg A. [et al.] // Fertil. Steril. — 2010. — Vol. 94, N 4. — P. 1320–1327.
- Minor congenital anomalies, major congenital malformations and development in children conceived from cryopreserved embryos / Sutcliffe A. G. [et al.] // Hum. Reprod. — 1995. — Vol. 10, N 12. — P. 3332–3337.
- Neonatal outcome after vitrified day 3 embryo transfer: a preliminary study / Rama Raju G. A. [et al.] // Fertil. Steril. — 2009. — Vol. 92, N 1. — P. 143–148.
- Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles / Belva F. [et al.] // Hum. Reprod. — 2008. — Vol. 23, N 10. — P. 2227–2238.
- Obstetric outcomes after transfer of vitrified blastocysts / Wikland M. [et al.] // Hum. Reprod. — 2010. — Vol. 25, N 7. — P. 1699–1707.
- Obstetric outcome in singletons after in vitro fertilization with cryopreserved/thawed embryos / Sazonova A. [et al.] // Hum. Reprod. — 2012. — Vol. 27, N 5. — P. 1343–1350.
- Outcome in children from cryopreserved embryos / Sutcliffe A. G. [et al.] // Arch. Dis. Child. — 1995. — Vol. 72, N 4. — P. 290–293.
- Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers / Shi W. [et al.] // Fertil. Steril. — 2012. — Vol. 97, N 6. — P. 1338–1342.
- Perinatal outcome of blastocyst transfer with vitrification, using cryoloop: a 4-year follow-up study / Takahashi K. [et al.] // Fertil. Steril. — 2005. — Vol. 84, N 1. — P. 88–92.
- Perinatal outcome of children born after frozen and fresh embryo transfer: the Finnish cohort study 1995–2006 /Pelkonen S. [et al.] // Hum. Reprod. — 2010. — Vol. 25, N 4. — P. 914–923.
- Physical and mental development of children after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer / Nakajo J. [et al.] // Reprod. Med. Biol. — 2004. — Vol. 3, N 2. — P. 63–67.
- Postnatal growth and health in children born after cryopreservation as embryos / Wennerholm U. B. [et al.] // Lancet. — 1998. — Vol. 351, N 9109. — P. 1071–1142.
- SART. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1995 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine / Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry // Fertil. Steril. — 1998. — Vol. 69, N 3. — P. 389–398.
- SART. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1997 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine / Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry // Fertil. Steril. — 2000. — Vol. 74, N 4. — P. 641–653.
- SART. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1998 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine / Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry // Fertil. Steril. — 2002. — Vol. 77, N 1. — P. 18–31.
- SART. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1999 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine / Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry // Fertil. Steril. — 2002. — Vol. 78, N 5. — P. 918–931.
- SART. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine / Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry // Fertil. Steril. — 2004. — Vol. 81, N 5. — P. 1207–1220.
- SART. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine / Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry // Fertil. Steril. — 2007. — Vol. 87, N 6. — P. 1253–1266.
补充文件
