电邮这篇文章 体外受精项目中的超声检查
- 作者: Kirakosyan E.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- City Clinical Hospital № 31
- 期: 卷 5, 编号 4 (2024)
- 页面: 870-881
- 栏目: 科学评论
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/DD/article/view/309842
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/DD629721
- ID: 309842
如何引用文章
详细
目前，超声检查作为体外受精项目不可分割的部分，其价值越来越受到人们的关注，这正是本综述主题的现实意义。在这篇科学文献综述中，以近年来最重要的研究为基础，试图回答一个有争议的问题，那就是如何选择主要的方法来评估卵巢储备和预测体外受精计划的结果。本文对二维和三维经阴道超声检查在计算卵泡数量时的优缺点进行了分析。列出了子宫内膜的超声特征和子宫动脉血流指标，它们是体外受精计划结果的可能预测因素。介绍了在体外受精项目中经腹卵母细胞抽吸的现代可能性。通过对文献数据的分析，可以做出如下结论，超声在体外受精项目中可提供的信息量巨大。
作者简介
Evgeniya V. Kirakosyan
City Clinical Hospital № 31
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: evgeniya.kirakosyan@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6021-2449
SPIN 代码: 4813-5625
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow参考
- Li YW, Liang XW, Fang JH, Chen ZY. Application of ultrasound markers measured at different time points of COH cycle in the prediction of ovarian response for individualised ovulation induction. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;42(5):1467–1473. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.2004101
- Ozerskaya IA. Manual on ultrasound diagnostics in obstetrics and gynecology: textbook. Moscow: MEDpress Inform; 2021. (In Russ.). EDN: RNUAOE doi: 10.24421/978-5-00030-860-8
- Coelho Neto MA, Ludwin A, Borrell A, et al. Counting ovarian antral follicles by ultrasound: a practical guide. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(1):10–20. doi: 10.1002/uog.18945
- Zhang Y, Xu Y, Xue Q, et al. Discordance between antral follicle counts and anti Müllerian hormone levels in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12958-019-0497-4
- Wang X, Jin L, Mao YD, et al. Evaluation of Ovarian Reserve Tests and Age in the Prediction of Poor Ovarian Response to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation A Real World Data Analysis of 89,002 Patients. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:702061. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.702061
- Arvis P, Rongières C, Pirrello O, Lehert P. Reliability of AMH and AFC measurements and their correlation: a large multicenter study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39(5):1045–1053. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02449-5
- Liu Y, Pan Z, Wu Y, et al. Comparison of anti Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count in the prediction of ovarian response: a systematic review and meta analysis. J Ovarian Res. 2023;16(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13048-023-01202-5
- Jacobs MH, Reuter LM, Baker VL, et al. A multicentre evaluation of the Elecsys anti Müllerian hormone immunoassay for prediction of antral follicle count. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(5):845–852. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.041
- Razafintsalama Bourdet M, Bah M, Amand G, et al. Random antral follicle count performed on any day of the menstrual cycle has the same predictive value as AMH for good ovarian response in IVF cycles. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022;51(1):102233. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102233
- Rombauts L, Onwude JL, Chew HW, Vollenhoven BJ. The predictive value of antral follicle count remains unchanged across the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(6):1514–1518. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.005
- Filippi F, Martinelli F, Paffoni A, et al. Fertility preservation in women with malignancies: the accuracy of antral follicle count collected randomly during the menstrual cycle in predicting the number of oocytes retrieved. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(3):569–578. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1377-0
- Chen Q, Sun L, Huang J, et al. Three dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography in the evaluation of diminished ovarian reserve and premature ovarian failure. Pak J Med Sci. 2023;39(3):747–751. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.3.7372
- Mathur P, Kakwani K, Diplav, et al. Deep Learning based Quantification of Ovary and Follicles using 3D Transvaginal Ultrasound in Assisted Reproduction. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020;2020:2109–2112. doi: 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176703
- Srivastava D, Gupta S, Kudavelly S, et al. Unsupervised Deep Learning based Longitudinal Follicular Growth Tracking during IVF Cycle using 3D Transvaginal Ultrasound in Assisted Reproduction. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021;2021:3209–3212. doi: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630495
- Raine Fenning N, Jayaprakasan K, Deb S, et al. Automated follicle tracking improves measurement reliability in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18(5):658–663. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60010-7
- Re C, Mignini Renzini M, Rodriguez A, et al. From a circle to a sphere: the ultrasound imaging of ovarian follicle with 2D and 3D technology. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35(3):184–189. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2018.1522297
- Yang J, Gao J, Wang Y, et al. Impact of follicular size categories on oocyte quality at trigger day in young and advanced age patients undergoing GnRH-ant therapy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1167395. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1167395
- Abbara A, Patel A, Hunjan T, et al. FSH Requirements for Follicle Growth During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:579. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00579
- Shapiro BS, Rasouli MA, Verma K, et al. The effect of ovarian follicle size on oocyte and embryology outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(6):1170–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.02.017
- Liang X, Zeng F, Li H, et al. Deep Learning Based Two Dimensional Ultrasound for Follicle Monitoring in Infertility Patients. BIOI. 2023;4(3):125–131. doi: 10.15212/bioi-2022-0024
- Liang X, Liang J, Zeng F, et al. Evaluation of oocyte maturity using artificial intelligence quantification of follicle volume biomarker by three dimensional ultrasound. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;45(6):1197–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.07.012
- Devine K, Dolitsky S, Ludwin I, Ludwin A. Modern assessment of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes in the era of high efficacy assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2022;118(1):19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.05.020
- Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, et al. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(4):530–541. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu011
- Zhang T, He Y, Wang Y, et al. The role of three dimensional power Doppler ultrasound parameters measured on hCG day in the prediction of pregnancy during in vitro fertilization treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;203:66–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.016
- Wu J, Sheng J, Wu X, Wu Q. Ultrasound assessed endometrial receptivity measures for the prediction of in vitro fertilization embryo transfer clinical pregnancy outcomes: A meta analysis and systematic review. Exp Ther Med. 2023;26(3):453. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.12152
- ESHRE Working Group on Ultrasound in ART; D’Angelo A, Panayotidis C, Amso N, et al. Recommendations for good practice in ultrasound: oocyte pick up. Hum Reprod Open. 2019;2019(4):hoz025. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz025
- Roman Rodriguez CF, Weissbrot E, Hsu CD, et al. Comparing transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound guided follicular aspiration: A risk assessment formula. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;54(6):693–699. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.02.004
- Sönmezer M, Gülümser Ç, Sönmezer M, et al. Transabdominal ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval using vaginal ultrasound probe: Definition of the technique. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(2):800–806. doi: 10.1111/jog.14618
- Sönmezer M, Saçıntı KG, Gülümser Ç, et al. Transabdominal ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval for oocyte cryopreservation using a vaginal probe: a comparison of applicability, effectiveness, and safety with conventional transvaginal approach. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023;40(2):399–405. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02705-8
- Raziel A, Vaknin Z, Schachter M, et al. Ultrasonographic guided percutaneous transabdominal puncture for oocyte retrieval in a rare patient with Rokitansky syndrome in an in vitro fertilization surrogacy program. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(6):1760–1763. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.039
- Barton SE, Politch JA, Benson CB, et al. Transabdominal follicular aspiration for oocyte retrieval in patients with ovaries inaccessible by transvaginal ultrasound. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(5):1773–1776. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.006
补充文件
