The Production of a Forensic Examination and the Procedural Status of Knowledgeable Persons in Criminal Proceedings in Russia and Latvia
- Autores: Lukichev B.A.1, Alexeev S.G.2
-
Afiliações:
- Ural-Siberian collegium of advocates
- Ural Research Institute of the All-Russian Voluntary Fire Society
- Edição: Volume 19, Nº 1 (2022)
- Páginas: 68-90
- Seção: CRIMINAL LEGAL SCIENCES
- ##submission.datePublished##: 04.05.2022
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2658-7602/article/view/349720
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2022-19-1-68-90
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CIUAOV
- ID: 349720
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
The article provides a comparative analysis of legal acts regulating the organization of forensic activities, as well as the legal status of knowledgeable persons in criminal proceedings in Russia and Latvia. Comparative legal analysis of normative acts consists in comparing the prescriptions of legal norms, legislative terms and definitions, allowing one to see the general and special, typical and unique in the regulation of forensic activities, as well as the rights and obligations, the volume and nature of the procedural functions of knowledgeable persons in criminal proceedings Russia and Latvia. The study is carried out on the basis of a comprehensive comparative legal analysis of the latest editions of criminal procedure laws (codes), laws in the field of organizing forensic activities in Russia and Latvia, by-laws, as well as other primary sources, including foreign ones, in the original language. Knowledgeable persons, i.e. persons applying special knowledge in criminal proceedings in Russia, are experts and specialists, in Latvia - experts, auditors and specialists. The legal status of knowledgeable persons in criminal proceedings in Russia and Latvia is largely comparable, but not identical. And, despite the transformation of the criminal procedural legislation of Latvia, in accordance with international legal norms and standards of the European Union, the provision of Soviet law on the use by knowledgeable persons of special knowledge in legal proceedings was preserved in the Latvian criminal process. The Code of Criminal Procedure of Russia classifies an expert and a specialist as other participants in criminal proceedings, that is, persons performing the function of promoting justice. Whereas the Latvian Criminal Procedure Law refers an expert and an auditor to persons having powers in criminal proceedings, a specialist - to other persons involved in criminal proceedings. And, if the expert and the auditor in the Criminal Procedure Law of Latvia are considered as independent participants in the criminal process, then the role of a specialist in legal proceedings is reduced to the level of “auxiliary personnel”. An expert and an auditor, according to the requirements of the Criminal Procedure Law of Latvia, are involved in criminal proceedings to give an opinion and fulfill the obligation to provide evidence, that is, as “means of ensuring judicial evidence”. Specialist - to assist officials performing procedural actions in fixing the progress and results of their conduct, using technical means to identify circumstances relevant to the case, but without conducting practical research in search of traces of a criminal act. The results of the comparative legal analysis of the normative acts regulating the rights, obligations, scope and nature of the procedural functions of knowledgeable persons in the criminal proceedings of Russia and Latvia allow us to expand our understanding of the application of special knowledge in the criminal proceedings of foreign states, as well as to critically assess the national criminal procedure legislation for the purpose of its further improvement and optimization. Based on the results of the study of the normative acts of Russia and Latvia, certain problematic aspects of the legal regulation of the procedural status of knowledgeable persons in the Russian criminal procedure legislation is noted, and generalizing conclusions are made.
Sobre autores
Boris Lukichev
Ural-Siberian collegium of advocates
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: lukichev_b@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6062-426X
Código SPIN: 1992-9475
scientific consultant, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor.
Rússia, 34 Tveritina st., section 9, Yekaterinburg, 620026Sergey Alexeev
Ural Research Institute of the All-Russian Voluntary Fire Society
Email: 3608113@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2951-5078
Código SPIN: 4563-2451
scientific consultant, Candidate of Chemical Sciences, Associate Professor.
Rússia, 32 Uchitelei st., Yekaterinburg, 620026Bibliografia
- Appazov A. Expert Evidence and International Criminal Justice. Cham : Springer, 2016. 207 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24340-5
- Bowers C. M. Forensic Testimony: Science, Law and Expert Evidence. Kidlington ; Oxford : Academic Press, 2014. 295 p.
- Bronstein D. A. Law for the Expert Witness. 4 th ed. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 2012. 240 p.
- Cohen K. S. Expert Witnessing and Scientific Testimony. A Guidebook. 2 nd ed. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 2016. 300 p.
- Doyle S. Quality Management in Forensic Science. London ; San Diego : Elsevier : Academic Press, 2019. 425 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2015-0-04588-9
- Ferguson C., Milward D. The Art of Science in the Canadian Justice System. A Reflection on My Experiences as an Expert Witness. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 2017. 171 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315229706
- Horne R., Mullen J. The Expert Witness in Construction. Oxford : John Wiley & Sons, 2013. 370 p.
- Houk M. M., Siegel J. A. Fundamentals of Forensic Science. 3 rd ed. Oxford ; San Diego : Elsevier : Academic Press, 2015. 736 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-12985-6
- Jackson R. W., Jackson J. M. Forensic Science. 3 rd ed. Harlow : Pearson Education, 2011. 545 p.
- Matson J. V. Effective Expert Witnessing. Practices for the 21st Century. 5 th ed. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 2013. 193 p.
- Shelton D. E. Forensic Science in Court. Challenges in the Twenty-First Century. Lanham : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2011. 197 p.
- The Expert Witness, Forensic Science and the Criminal Justice Systems of the UK / by ed. L. Hackman, F. Raitt, S. Black. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 2019. 179 p.
- Бурков И. В. Заключение и показания эксперта в уголовном процессе : моногр. М. : Юрлитинформ, 2010. 144 с.
- Семенов Е. А., Васюков В. Ф., Волеводз А. Г. Правовой статус и правовая регламентация участия специалиста в уголовном процессе: теоретические, процессуальные и организационные аспекты. М. : МГИМОУниверситет, 2020. 227 с.
- Bohlander M. Principles of German Criminal Procedure. Oxford : Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012. 326 p.
- European Criminal Procedures / ed. by M. Delmas-Marty, J. R. Spencer. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2006. 775 p.
- Handbook of European Criminal Procedure / by ed. R. E. Kostoris. Cham : Springer, 2018. 465 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72462-1
- Репеле М., Алксне М., Ченторицка М. Аккредитация судебно-экспертных учреждений и сертификация судебных экспертов в Латвии // Теория и практика судебной экспертизы. 2014. № 1 (33). С. 28-34.
- Щербаковський М. Г. Обов’язкове призначення судових експертиз у кримінальному провадженні // Теорія та практика судової експертизи і криміналістики : зб. наук. пр. / ред. кол. А. І. Лозовий, В. Ю. Шепітько та ін. Харків: Право, 2016. Вип. 16. С. 148-157.
- Мысина И. В. Сущность ревизии и ее отличие от других форм контроля // Вестник Российского университета кооперации. 2014. № 2 (16). С. 20-25.
Arquivos suplementares



