Governance of Protectionist Measures within the WTO
- Authors: Kolesnikova T.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Saint-Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation
- Issue: Vol 18, No 6 (2022)
- Pages: 299-308
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2541-8025/article/view/147325
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2541-8025-2022-18-6-299-308
- ID: 147325
Cite item
Abstract
Keywords
About the authors
Tatiana V. Kolesnikova
Saint-Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation
Email: kolesnikova-tv@mail.ru
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor of the Department of International Business Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
References
- Afontsev, S.A. 2020, Politics and economics of trade wars. Zhournal Novoi Ekonomicheskoi Associacii /Journal of the New Economic Association, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 193-198. doi: 10.31737/2221-2264-2020-45-1-9.
- Biryukova O.V. Joint Initiatives Instead of Multilateralism: A New Reality for the WTO? MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2021. №14(5). Pp. 167-186. (In Russ.). doi: 10.24833/2071-8160-2021-5-80-167-186.
- Bobylev P.M, Semeikin A.Yu. «Green» Protectionism of Europe. Energy policy, 2020. № 10(152). Pp. 24-33. doi: 10.46920/2409-5516_2020_10152_24.
- Vinogradov N.A. The role and importance of international organizations in the context of globalization and deglobalization. Actual problems and prospects for the development of the economy: Russian and foreign experience. 2019. № 3(22). Pp. 109-113.
- Grinberg R.S., Komolov O.O. (2022). Protectionism in Russia: New trends in the context of the import of institutions. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(2), 44-54. doi: 10.15838/esc.2022.2.80.3
- Kovalchuk, J.A., Pichkov O.V., Stepnov I.M. The Integration Role of State Regulation and State Support For Research And Technological Development. Drukerovskij vestnik. 2019. № 4(30). Pp. 70-83. doi: 10.17213/2312-6469-2019-4-70-83.
- Milovidov, V. D., & Asker-Zade, N. V. Protectionism 2.0: New reality in the age of globalisation. World Economy and International Relations. 2020. №64(8), Pp. 37-45. doi: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-8-37-45
- Obolenskiy, V.P. From Legitimate Protectionism to Trade Wars? World Economy and International relations, 2018, vol. 62, No. 9, pp. 18-25. doi: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-18-25.
- Peshkova, G. Yu., Bondar E. G. Problems and prospects of revival of peat industry. Economics and Entrepreneurship. 2020. № 12(125). Pp. 58-62. doi: 10.34925/EIP.2021.125.12.009.
- Portanskiy A. The Imperative of WTO Reform in an Era of Rising Protectionism and Trade Wars. International Organisations Research Journal, 2019. vol. 14, no 2, pp. 238-251 (in Russian and English). doi: 10.17323/1996-7845-2019-02-12.
- Portanskiy A. Russia’s approaches to reform of the WTO. Trade policy. 2020. № 2(22). Pp. 25-29. doi: 10.17323/2499-9415-2020-2-22-25-29.
- Sidorov, A. A. Features of the modern protectionism of the USA and the EU towards Russia. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. 2022. №15(4). Pp. 44-64. doi: 10.24833/2071-8160-2022-4-85-44-64
- Smbatyan A.S. Novelties in EU Anti-Dumping policy and WTO Rules. Russian foreign economic bulletin. 2020. № 11. Pp. 16-35. doi: 10.24411/2072-8042-2020-10109.
- Smirnov, E. N., &Lukyanov, S. A. International Political Economy of Preferential Trade Agreements. World Economy and International Relations. 2022. №66(5). Pp. 32-40. doi: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-5-32-40.
- Stepnov I.M., Kovalchuk, J.A. The Prospects of Forming Export Oriented Sectoral Digital Platforms within the Framework of Developing Ecosystems in Industry. Economics. Taxes. Law. 2019. № 4. Pp. 6-19. doi: 10.26794/1999-849X-2019-12-4-6-19.
- Balogh, J. M., & Mizik, T. Trade-climate nexus: A systematic review of the literature. Economies. 2021. № 9(3). doi: 10.3390/economies9030099.
- De Melo, M. L. Protection of domestic investors under the WTO and international investment regimes. World Trade Review. 2020. № 19(4). Pp. 589-604. doi: 10.1017/S1474745620000142.
- Delev, C. (2022). Straining the spaghetti bowl: Re-evaluating the regulation of preferential rules of origin. Journal of International Economic Law, 25(1), Pp. 25-44. doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgac001.
- Ikejiaku, B., &Dayao, C. (2021). Competition law as an instrument of protectionist policy: Comparative analysis of the EU and the US. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law. 2021. №36(1). Pp. 75-94. doi: 10.5334/UJIEL.513.
- Jiang, F. Environmental protection, China and International Trade: Greening the WTO ban on Chinese Export duties. Environmental protection, china and international trade: Greening the WTO ban on Chinese Export duties. 2021. Pp. 1-228. doi: 10.4324/9781003162339.
- Jillani, A. S., & Wu, X. Article 25 as an alternate way to resolve the crisis of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism: A Chinese perspective. China and WTO Review. 2021. №7(1). Pp. 153-170. doi: 10.14330/cwr.2021.7.1.07.
- Jones, K. (2021). Populism and trade: The challenge to the global trading system. Populism and trade: The challenge to the global trading system. 2021. Pp. 1-260. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190086350.001.0001.
- Karim, R., Syed, R. F., & Islam, M. T. Trade protectionism & China’s international trade disputes: Renewable energy perspectives. China and WTO Review. 2022. №8(1). Pp. 107-126. doi: 10.14330/cwr.2022.8.1.04.
- Kim, K., &Roh, J. US anti-dumping practices evolving against market economies. World Trade Review. 2022. №21(4). Pp. 479-496. doi: 10.1017/S1474745622000143
- Krapohl, S., Ocelík, V., &Walentek, D. M. (2021). The instability of globalization: Applying evolutionary game theory to global trade cooperation. Public Choice. 2021. №188(1-2). Pp. 31-51. doi: 10.1007/s11127-020-00799.
- Martins, M. M. V., &Burnquist, H. L. Impact of Non-tariff Barriers in the Context of the EU-Mercosur Agreement. 2021. №9(1). Pp. 51-69. doi: 10.5752/P.2317-773X.2021V9N1P51-69.
- Park, S. Protectionism as challenges for the global trade governance. The future of global economic governance: Challenges and prospects in the age of uncertainty. 2020. Pp. 87-100.doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-35336-0_7.
- Petersmann, E. Economic disintegration? Political, economic, and legal drivers and the need for «greening embedded trade liberalism». Journal of International Economic Law. 2020. №23(2). Pp. 347-370. doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgaa005.
- Sishi, Q., Ji'An, T., Feng, L., Shuqian, S., &Shiying, L. Research and practice of quantitative models on the freedom of trade based on AHP-FCE method: Taking major countries in WTO as examples. Paper presented at the E3S Web of Conferences. 2020. Pp. 214. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202021401048.
- Talalova, L. N., &Tian, J. Case analysis of USA anti-dumping to China’s color TV sets. 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59126-7_165.
- Vahalík, B., &Fojtíková, L. The effects of trade policy on trade among the EU and BRICS countries. EkonomickyCasopis. 2020. №68(9). Pp.918-938. doi: 10.31577/ekoncas.2020.09.03.
- Xu, M. Effect evaluation of WTO dispute settlement mechanism based on artificial neural network. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. 2022. doi: 10.1155/2022/5196698.
- Yang, X., &Qu, S. China-U.S. trade friction under trade unilateralism and china's legal responses. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations. 2020. №6(2). Pp. 655-691.
- Zuev, V. (2022). Regional Trade Agreements: A Hope or a Threat to the Global Trade? In: Karhu, A., Haaja, E. (eds) Global Trade and Trade Governance During De-Globalization. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-13757-0_4.
Supplementary files
