(De)Motivating factors of e-mentoring integration in English academic writing classrooms
- Authors: Mudra H.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci
- Issue: Vol 9, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 22-39
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2520-2073/article/view/362079
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2025-9-3-22-39
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XIPSDI
- ID: 362079
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
It remains unquestionable that learning a language such as English through online mode may have transformative impacts on students’ motivational process. Grounded from the rationale, this study explored EFL students’ (de)motivating factors in integrating e-mentoring methods during academic writing projects. Thirteen selected university students with different demographic variables (i.e., grade, gender, university, age, language proficiency) attended multiple interviews, focus group discussions, and classroom observation as data collection methods. The data were analysed through the integration of IDEEAS framework, consisting of Inclusion, Design, Engagement, Evaluation, Assessment, and Support phases and a descriptive statistical analysis. The findings are twofold. First, e-mentoring motivated EFL students to engage with academic paper writing as it effectively reduced cultural and linguistic barriers (i.e., through online tutorials, games, or discussion), promoted always-on communication (i.e., through synchronous and asynchronous modes), and relied on process rather than product (i.e., through dialogic syllabus). Nevertheless, e-mentoring remained demotivating for the students as it concerned with verbalised communication, threatened face-to-face interaction, and caused them to rely on online culture. This study implies that university stakeholders, mentors, or supervisors have to integrate e-mentoring into English learning curriculum and facilitate online learning procedures systematically. In short, motivating and demotivating factors in e-mentoring process remain critical as academic paper writing cannot be successfully engaged with online meeting. The e-mentor has to implement particular strategies by intensively utilising online apps to increase effective communication and overcome drawbacks during the academic writing project.
About the authors
Heri Mudra
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci
Email: herimudra4@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3712-2701
References
- Addae, D., Abakah, E., & Amuzu, D. (2025). Adults who learn online: Exploring the online learning readiness of nontraditional undergraduate students in a Ghanaian university. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 8, Article 100407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100407
- Ajabshir, Z. F. (2019). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on EFL learners’ pragmatic competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 169-177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.015
- Alawamleh, M., Al-Twait, L. M., & Al-Saht, G. R. (2021). The effect of online learning on communication between instructors and students during Covid-19 pandemic. Asian Education and Development Studies, 11(2), 380-400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2020-0131
- Alemdag, E., & Erdem, M. (2017). Designing an e-mentoring program for novice teachers in Turkey and investigating online interactions and program outcomes. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(2), 123-150.
- Alhadlaq, A., Kharrufa, A., & Olivier, P. (2019). Exploring e-mentoring: Co-designing & un-platforming. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(11), 1122-1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1571110
- Alzubi, A. A. F., & Nazim, M. (2024). Students’ intrinsic motivation in EFL academic writing: Topic-based interest in focus. Heliyon, 10(1), Article e24169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24169
- Arnold, K. D., Deutschlander, D. T., & Lewis, J. S. (2022). Someone on my side: The experiences of high-achieving, underserved high school students in an e-mentoring college access intervention. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 30(4), 381-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2022.2091193
- Aslan, A. (2021). Problem-based learning in live online classes: Learning achievement, problem-solving skill, communication skill, and interaction. Computers & Education, 171, Article 104237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104237
- Bingham, A. J. (2023). From data management to actionable findings: A five-phase process of qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620
- Bingham A. J., & Witkowsky, P. (2022). Deductive and inductive approaches to qualitative data analysis. In C. Vanover, P. Mihas, & J. Saldaña (Eds.), Analyzing and interpreting qualitative data: After the interview (pp. 133-146). Sage Publications.
- Bishop, S. C. (2021). ‘What does a torture survivor look like?’ Nonverbal communication in US asylum interviews and hearings. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 15(2), 185-203.
- Can, Ş., Durgun, H., & Dalcalı, B. K. (2022). Effect of online communication skills training on effective communication and self-efficacy and self-regulated learning skills of nursing students: A randomized controlled study. Nurse Education in Practice, 63, Article 103371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103371
- Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2024). Investigating synchronous and asynchronous written corrective feedback in a computer-assisted environment: EFL learners’ linguistic performance and perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2315070
- Cicchinelli, A., & Pammer-Schindler, V. (2021). What makes volunteer mentors tick? A case study in a preparatory online training course. Journal of Workplace Learning, 34(3), 256-276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-12-2020-0191
- Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667343
- Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.) Routledge. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315833750
- Ebrahimi, M. (2022). Ubiquitous learning: The effect of LingAR application on EFL learners’ language achievement and the realization of their motivation towards mobile learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2041044
- Foung, D., Lin, L., & Chen, J. (2024). Reinventing assessments with ChatGPT and other online tools: Opportunities for GenAI-empowered assessment practices. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100250
- Gafni-Lachter, L., Niemeyer, L., Doyle, N., Norcross, J., & Jacobs, K. (2021). Equal peer e-mentoring for online graduate students: A case study and mediation model. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 29(5), 545-564. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2021.1986799
- Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653
- Giray, L., Sevnarayan, K., & Ranjbaran Madiseh, F. (2025). Beyond policing: AI writing detection tools, trust, academic integrity, and their implications for college writing. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 29(1), 83-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2024.2437174
- Guo, Q., Yang, B., Xiao, L., & Xie, C. (2024). Foreign language learning and the development of global competence in different cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 101, Article 102013. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102013
- Guo, W., Bai, B., & Song, H. (2021). Influences of process-based instruction on students’ use of self-regulated learning strategies in EFL writing. System, 101, Article 102578. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102578
- Han, R., Alibakhshi, G., Lu, L., & Labbafi, A. (2024). Digital communication activities and EFL learners’ willingness to communicate and engagement: Exploring the intermediate language learners’ perceptions. Heliyon, 10(3), Article e25213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25213
- Hardt, D., Nagler, M., & Rincke, J. (2022). Can peer mentoring improve online teaching effectiveness? An RCT during the COVID-19 pandemic. Labour Economics, 78, Article 102220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102220
- Hsiao, J. C., & Chang, J. S. (2023). Enhancing EFL reading and writing through AI-powered tools: Design, implementation, and evaluation of an online course. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 4934-4949. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2207187
- Hsu, H. C. (2022). Peer interaction and attention to form in web-based synchronous and asynchronous L2 collaborative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(7), 1602-1631. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2095405
- Huerta, M., Goodson, P., Beigi, M., & Chlup, D. (2016). Graduate students as academic writers: writing anxiety, self-efficacy and emotional intelligence. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(4), 716-729. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1238881
- Ji, X., & Zhang, A. J. (2025). Demotivation in English learning of Chinese medical students: Insights from situated expectancy-value theory. Acta Psychologica, 253, Article 104716. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104716
- Karaca, M., & Inan, S. (2020). A measure of possible sources of demotivation in L2 writing: A scale development and validation study. Assessing Writing, 43, Article 100438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.100438
- Kaçar, I. G., & Baltacı, H. Ş. (2023). Designing a complementary e-mentoring program for pre-service ELT teachers: Online co-mentoring project. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 31(3), 352-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2023.2202473
- Kaufman, M. R., Zhou, X., Yenokyan, G., Levine, D. K., Wright, K., Salcido, M., … Palen, L. A. (2024). Exploring organizational digital readiness to offer youth E-Mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 32(4), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2024.2349013
- Kumar, S., Roumell, E. A., & Bolliger, D. U. (2023). Faculty perceptions of e-mentoring doctoral dissertations: Challenges, strategies, and institutional support. American Journal of Distance Education, 39(2), 128–1. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2023.2213137
- Lacombe, C., Elalouf, K., & Collin, C. (2024). Impact of social anxiety on communication skills in face-to-face vs. online contexts. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 15, Article 100458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100458
- Lomellini, A., Lowenthal, P. R., Snelson, C., & Trespalacios, J. H. (2022). Higher education leaders’ perspectives of accessible and inclusive online learning. Distance Education, 43(4), 574-595.
- Lyu, W., & Salam, Z. A. (2025). AI-powered personalized learning: Enhancing self-efficacy, motivation, and digital literacy in adult education through expectancy-value theory. Learning and Motivation, 90, Article 102129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102129
- Martin, F., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2023). IDEAS framework for teaching online. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2023/4/ideas-framework-for-teaching-online
- Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001
- Mohammed, M. A. S., & AL-Jaberi, M. A. (2021). Google Docs or Microsoft Word? Master’s students’ engagement with instructor written feedback on academic writing in a cross-cultural setting. Computers and Composition, 62, Article 102672. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102672
- Mullen, C. A. (2023). Guiding online students in a crisis: An intervention for mentoring educational leadership doctoral candidates. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 18(3), 510-533. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427751221097147
- Osiyanova, O. M, Burikova, S. A., & Radyuk, A. V. (2024). Technology for improving students’ communicative skills in the university digital educational environment. Training, Language and Culture, 8(4), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2024-8-4-24-35
- Oyedemi, T., & Kgasago, T. J. (2017). Always-available communication and technological distractions: Technology use, texting and driving. Communicatio, 43(3-4), 36-53.
- Phyo, W. M., Nikolov, M., & Hódi, Á. (2024). What support do international doctoral students claim they need to improve their academic writing in English? Ampersand, 12, Article 100161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2023.100161
- Rahimi, M. (2024). Effects of integrating motivational instructional strategies into a process-genre writing instructional approach on students’ engagement and argumentative writing. System, 121, Article 103261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103261
- Reid, E., & Ivenz, P. (2025). Planning and evaluation of an adapted online intercultural communication course for undergraduate English language students. Evaluation and Program Planning, 111, Article 102599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102599
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
- Sakai, H., & Kikuchi, K. (2009). An analysis of demotivators in the EFL classroom. System, 37, 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.09.005
- Stošić, L., & Guillén-Gámez, F. D. (2024). The potential of it tools in foreign language acquisition: A comprehensive assessment. Training, Language and Culture, 8(4), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2024-8-4-95-108
- Shin, J. Y., Dixon, L. Q., & Choi, Y. (2019). An updated review on use of L1 in foreign language classrooms. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(5), 406-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1684928
- Suleyeva, K., Tovma, N., & Zakirova, O. (2021). Developing emotional intelligence in elementary school children in Russia: Verbal and non-verbal communication. Education 3-13, 50(8), 1095-1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1934060
- Tabari, M. A., & Johnson, M. D. (2025). Rethinking fluency in task-based L2 writing: A critical examination of product- and process-based measures. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4(3), Article 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100225
- Townsend, J. (2025). Kuroko workflows: Process over product in translingual reading and writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 76, Article 101536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101536
- Trinh, A.-H., & Dinh, H. (2024). Language and home-culture integrated online learning curriculum for developing intercultural communicative competence. Journal for Multicultural Education, 18(12), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-09-2023-0097
- Underman, K., Kochunilathil, M., McLean, L., & Vinson, A. H. (2022). Online student culture as site for negotiating assessment in medical education. Social Science & Medicine, 310, Article 115270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115270
- Uştuk, Ö., & Aydın, S. (2016). The effects of the use of paralinguistic cues on foreign language anxiety among English as a foreign language speakers. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2016.1211133
- Vaghjee, G., & Vaghjee, H. (2022). Participatory learning culture: From spectators to creators in online learning environments. In U. G. Singh, C. S. Nair, C. Blewett, & T. Shea (Eds.), Academic voices: A conversation on new approaches to teaching and learning in the post-COVID world (pp. 101–113). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91185-6.00003-3
- Wang, Q., Ji, Z., Li, J., & Pang, Y. (2023). Mutual mentor: Online contrastive distillation network for general continual learning. Neurocomputing, 537, 37-48.
- Wang, J., Liardét, C., & Lum, J. (2024). Feeling like an academic writer: an exploration of doctoral students’ struggle for recognition. Studies in Continuing Education, 47(1), 285-301.
- Wang, W., & Wu, Y. (2025). EFL learner motivation and psychological well-being in online instruction: To spy the traces of resilience, autonomy, and engagement via path analysis. Learning and Motivation, 89, Article 102078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102078
- Wang, R., & Zhang, H. (2025). Integrating positive psychology principles in vocational education: A new approach to boosting student well-being and academic motivation. Acta Psychologica, 254, Article 104834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104834
- Wright, K., Levine, D. K., Salcido, M., Garringer, M., Almendra, T., Bazell, A., & Kaufman, M. R. (2024). From crisis to capacity: Lessons learned from youth e-mentoring during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 14, Article 100400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100400
- Wu, Z. (2020). Tracing EFL writers’ digital literacy practices in asynchronous communication: A multiple-case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, Article 100754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100754
- Wu, W. C. V., Yang, J. C., Scott Chen Hsieh, J., & Yamamoto, T. (2019). Free from demotivation in EFL writing: The use of online flipped writing instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(4), 353-387.
- Xie, Q., & Cui, Y. (2021). Preservice teachers’ implementation of formative assessment in English writing class: Mentoring matters. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, Article 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101019
- Zalazar, M. L. (2025). Digital multimodal composing versus traditional monomodal writing: A look at the Spanish imperfect subjunctive from a process and product perspective. System, 132, Article 103718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103718
Supplementary files

