A Corpus-based Analysis of Rhetorical Moves and P-frames in an Omani Learner Corpus of Research Project Abstracts

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Background: Rhetorical moves have long been studied in several disciplinary texts, including research articles and their part-genres. A solid base of literature has emerged in this respect, informing current writing pedagogy for novice writers. However, one part-genre which has been rarely studied is student project abstracts. This paper represents one of the first studies to explore the extent rhetorical moves are realised through the linguistic unit of phrase frames (p-frames) in final year Capstone project abstracts.

Methods: Using two faculty-informed analytical frameworks, the paper explores the use of rhetorical moves and p-frames in corpora of Social and Physical Science student abstracts.  The moves and the p-frames (if any) used to realise them were identified in order to understand how students organised this part-genre and to gauge their formulaicity.

Results: Amongst the key findings was that Omani students did not perform all the rhetorical moves recommended by the faculty. Moreover, they added spontaneous moves of their own to the abstracts. When performing rhetorical moves, they used very few p-frames, indicating that their approach did not rely on formulaic language of this nature.

Conclusions: Pedagogical implications for the Omani context and for broader EAP contexts are discussed.

Авторлар туралы

P. Mathew

Middle East College, Oman

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: priya@mec.edu.om

L. Mccallum

The University of Edinburgh, UK

Email: lmccall2@ed.ac.uk

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Al Jardhani, S. (2017). English language curriculum evaluation in Oman.International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(5), 40-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n5p40
  2. Amnuai, W. (2019). Analyses of rhetorical moves and linguistic realizations in accounting research article abstracts published in international and Thai-based journals. Sage Open, 9(1), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822384
  3. Anthony, L. (2021). AntGram (Version 1.3.0) [Computer Software]. Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.
  4. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finnegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
  5. Can, S., Karabacak, E., & Qin, J. (2016). Structure of moves in research article abstracts in applied linguistics. Publications, 4(3), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4030023
  6. Casal, J. E., & Kessler, M. (2020). Form and rhetorical function of phrase-frames in promotional writing: A corpus-and genre-based analysis. System, 95, 102370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102370
  7. Cortes, V. (2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002
  8. Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2017). A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 90-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001
  9. Coxhead, A., & Byrd, P. (2007). Preparing writing teachers to teach the vocabulary and grammar of academic prose. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 129-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.002
  10. Cunningham, K. J. (2017). A phraseological exploration of recent mathematics research articles through key phrase frames. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 25, 71-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.11.005
  11. Darabad, A. M. (2016). Move analysis of research article abstracts: A cross-disciplinary study.International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 125-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9379
  12. Doró, K. (2013). The rhetoric structure of research article abstracts in English studies journals. Prague Journal of English Studies, 2(1), 119-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjes-2014-0013
  13. Dos Santos, M. B. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text & Talk, 16(4), 481-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1996.16.4.481
  14. Durrant, P., & Mathews-Aydınlı, J. (2011). A function-first approach to identifying formulaic language in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 58-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.05.002
  15. Durrant, P. (2017). Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students' writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 165-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv011
  16. Golparvar, S. E., & Barabadi, E. (2020). Key phrase frames in the discussion section of research articles of higher education. Lingua, 236, 102804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102804
  17. Gray, B., & Biber, D. (2013). Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation.International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(1), 109-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.1.08gra
  18. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Longman.
  19. Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
  20. Hüttner, J. (2010). The potential of purpose-built corpora in the analysis of student academic writing in English. Journal of Writing Research, 2(2), 197-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2010.02.02.6
  21. Kanoksilapatham, B. (2013). Generic characterisation of civil engineering research article abstracts. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 19(3), 1-11.
  22. Le, T. N. P., & Harrington, M. (2015). Phraseology used to comment on results in the discussion section of applied linguistics quantitative research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 39, 45-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.03.003
  23. Lu, X., Yoon, J., & Kisselev, O. (2018). A phrase-frame list for Social Science research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 76-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.09.004
  24. Lu, X., Yoon, J., & Kisselev, O. (2021a). Matching phrase-frames to rhetorical moves in Social Science research article introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 61, 63-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.10.001
  25. Lu, X., Yoon, J., Kisselev, O., Casal, J. E., Liu, Y., Deng, J., & Nie, R. (2021b). Rhetorical and phraseological features of research article introductions: Variation among five Social Science disciplines. System, 100, 102543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102543
  26. Martin, J. R. (1997). Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In C. Francis., & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 3-39). Continuum.
  27. Nekrasova-Beker, T. M. (2019). Discipline-specific use of language patterns in engineering: A comparison of published pedagogical materials. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 41, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100774
  28. Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030199
  29. Omidian, T., Shahriari, H., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2018). A cross-disciplinary investigation of multi-word expressions in the moves of research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.08.002
  30. Pawley, A., & Syder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory. In J. Richards., & R. Schmidt. (Eds,). Language and Communication (pp.191-226). Longman.
  31. Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607087010
  32. Römer, U. (2010). Establishing the phraseological profile of a text type: The construction of meaning in academic book reviews. English Text Construction, 3, 95-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.3.1.06rom
  33. Saboori, F., & Hashemi, M. R. (2013). A cross-disciplinary move analysis of research article abstracts.International Journal of Language Learning & Applied Linguistics World, 4(4), 483-496.
  34. Saeeaw, S., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2014). Rhetorical variation across research article abstracts in Environmental Science and Applied Linguistics. English Language Teaching, 7(8), 81-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n8p81
  35. Stubbs, M. (2007). Quantitative data on multiword sequences in English: the case of the word world. In M. Hoey., M. Mahlberg., M. Stubbs., W. Teubert (Eds.), Text, discourse and corpora: Theory and analysis (pp. 163-189). Continuum.
  36. Soler-Monreal, C. (2015). Announcing one's work in PhD theses in computer science: A comparison of Move 3 in literature reviews written in English L1, English L2 and Spanish L1. English for Specific Purposes, 40, 27-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.07.004
  37. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
  38. Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge University Press.
  39. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2009). Abstracts and the writing of abstracts (Vol. 2). University of Michigan Press ELT.
  40. Tseng, F. P. (2011). Analyses of move structure and verb tense of research article abstracts in applied linguistics journals.International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 27-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v1n2p27
  41. Walcott, K. (2021). Informing academic writing pedagogy through the study of phrase-frames. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(1), 158-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1201.17
  42. Wei, H.Y., Razali, A.B., & Abd Samad, A. (2022). Writing abstracts for research articles: Towards a framework for move structure of abstracts. World Journal of English Language, 12(6), 492-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n6p492
  43. Yoon, J., & Casal, J. E. (2020). Phrase-frames and rhetorical moves in applied linguistics conference abstracts. In U. Romer.
  44. V. Cortes, & E. Friginal (Eds.), Advances in corpus-based research on academic writing: Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise (pp. 282-305). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.95.12yoo

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу


Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қолжетімді Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.