Email this article Features of the balance of ecosystem services and risks for woody plants in the Samara Region
- Authors: Zaika A.S.1,2, Kavelenova L.M.2
-
Affiliations:
- Research Institute of Horticulture and Medicinal Plants «Zhigulevskie Sady»
- Samara National Research University
- Issue: Vol 11, No 3 (2022)
- Pages: 41-47
- Section: Biological Sciences
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2309-4370/article/view/114878
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.55355/snv2022113104
- ID: 114878
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The development of the concept of ecosystem services, started at the end of the 20th century mainly by foreign authors, has recently extended to the consideration of various aspects of the mankind interaction with the surrounding natural complexes, including the functioning of agroecosystems of various types and urban environments. The urban ecosystem includes various forms of infrastructure that provide services to the population, including green infrastructure consisting of natural plant systems and associated green technologies. Green infrastructure ensures the implementation of regulatory, supportive and cultural ecosystem services. On the other hand, the reverse interaction has recently been considered – the practice of considering ecosystem services provided directly by the urban environment for the conservation of biological diversity has appeared. The provision of ecosystem services is an important role of urban plantings, and the contribution of woody plants to their implementation is particularly important. Despite the small share of the area occupied in the urban environment, the use of land covered with trees contributes to a significant reduction in the «ecological footprint» of the city. However, the quality of ecosystem services provided is largely determined by the vital condition of a particular instance of trees and depends on their specific features. Based on the actual data obtained during the survey of model plots of street plantings in Samara, the authors consider the features of the balance between ecosystem services and risks associated with the species composition and vital state of the tree component of plantings in the urban environment. For a number of species of woody plants, their actual role in the urban environment has been factorially analyzed, taking into account the effectiveness of the implementation of ecosystem services and the severity of problems associated with their condition or life characteristics.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Anna Sergeevna Zaika
Research Institute of Horticulture and Medicinal Plants «Zhigulevskie Sady»; Samara National Research University
Email: zaika_anna96@mail.ru
researcher; postgraduate student of Ecology, Botany and Nature Protection Department
Russian Federation, Samara; SamaraLyudmila Mikhailovna Kavelenova
Samara National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: lkavelenova@mail.ru
doctor of biological sciences, professor, head of Ecology, Botany and Nature Protection Department
Russian Federation, SamaraReferences
- Costanza R., d'Arge R., De Groot R. et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital // Nature. 1997. Vol. 387 (6630). P. 253–260.
- Daily G. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington: Island Press, 1997. 392 p.
- De Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., Boumans R.M. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services // Ecological Economics. 2002. Vol. 41. P. 393–408.
- McKenzie T. Environmental Innovations in Urban Ecosystems // Introduction to Agroecology / C. Caldwell, S. Wang (eds). Singapore: Springer, 2020. P. 237–258. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-8836-5_18.
- Banerjee A., Meena R.S., Jhariya M.K., Yadav D.K. Agroecological footprints management for sustainable food system. Singapore: Springer, 2021. 518 p. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-9496-0.
- Breuste J., Pauleit S., Haase D., Sauerwein M. Urban ecosystems: function, management and development. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 2021. 339 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-63279-6.
- Grunewald K., Bastian O. Ecosystem services – concept, methods and case studies. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 2015. 319 р. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-44143-5.
- Hall M.H.P., Balogh S.B. Understanding urban ecology: an interdisciplinary systems approach. Cham: Springer, 2019. 368 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-11259-2.
- van Bueren E., van Bohemen H., Itard L., Visscher H. Sustainable urban environments: an ecosystem approach. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012. 436 p. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1294-2.
- Экологический след субъектов Российской Федерации. Основные выводы и рекомендации. М.: WWF России, 2017. 72 с.
- A catalogue of ecosystem services in Slovakia: benefits to society / P. Mederly, J. Cernecky (eds). Cham: Springer, 2020. 259 р. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-46508-7.
- Sabogal A. Urban ecology: a case study of Lima city, Peru. Cham: Springer, 2021. 175 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-69905-5.
- Boyd J., Banzhaf S. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units // Ecological Economics. 2007. Vol. 63. P. 616–626.
- Catalano C., Andreucci M.B., Guarino R., Bretzel F., Leone M., Pasta S. Urban services to ecosystems: green infrastructure benefts from the landscape to the urban scale. Cham: Springer, 2021. 536 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-75929-2.
- Haines-Young R., Potschin M. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being // Ecosystem ecology: a new synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. P. 110–139.
- Fisher B., Turner R.K. Ecosystem services: classification for valuation // Biological Conservation. 2008. Vol. 141. P. 1167–1169.
- Roy S., Byrne J., Pickering C. А systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones // Urban Forestry and Urban Greening. 2012. № 11. P. 351–363.
- Marzluff J., Shulenberger E., Endlicher W., Alberti M., Bradley G., Ryan C., ZumBrunnen C., Simon U. Urban ecology: an international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. New York: Springer, 2008. 802 p.
- Букварёва Е.Н., Замолодчиков Д.Г. Экосистемные услуги России: прототип национального доклада. Т. 1. Услуги наземных экосистем. М.: Изд-во Центра охраны дикой природы, 2016. 148 с.
- Алексеев В.А. Диагностика жизненного состояния деревьев и древостоев // Лесоведение. 1989. № 4. С. 51–57.
- Майдебура И.С., Чупахина Г.Н. Оценка жизненного состояния древоcтоя в условиях города // Вестник РГУ им. И. Канта. 2007. Вып. 1. Естественные науки. С. 88–97.
- Заика А.С., Кавеленова Л.М. Эффективность реализации различных экологических услуг компонентами системы озеленения г. Самары // Экологический сборник 7: тр. молодых ученых (г. Тольятти, 18–21 апреля 2019 г.) / под ред. С.А. Сенатора, О.В. Мухортовой, С.В. Саксонова. Тольятти: ИЭВБ РАН, «Анна», 2019. С. 172–175. doi: 10.24411/9999-010A-2019-10040.
- Кавеленова Л.М., Розно С.А., Хныкина А.С. Деревья в озеленении города: к концепции баланса «экологические услуги / проблемы, расходы, риски» // Экология родного края: проблемы и пути их решения: мат-лы ХIII всерос. науч.-практ. конф. c междунар. участием. Кн. 1 (23–24 апреля 2018 г.). Киров: ВятГУ, 2018. С. 111–114.
- Об утверждении муниципальной программы городского округа Самара «Озеленение территории городского округа Самара» на 2013–2017 годы: постановление Администрации городского округа Самара от 18.12.2012 № 1627 [Электронный ресурс] // Электронный фонд правовых и нормативно-технических документов. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/464000574.
Supplementary files
