The Principle of "Mirror Reflection" in the Rights and Obligations of Participants in Foreign Economic Activity and Customs Authorities
- 作者: Bobrova A.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- 期: 编号 2 (2023)
- 页面: 1-13
- 栏目: Articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2306-9945/article/view/360596
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IEOEAL
- ID: 360596
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
The subject of the study is the relationship between the rights and obligations of participants in foreign economic activity and customs authorities, namely, the implementation of the principle of "mirror reflection" in the complex formation of rights and obligations. The purpose of the study is to search for gaps in customs legislation that do not directly link the rights and obligations of customs subjects, as well as to develop recommendations for its amendment. The methodological basis of the study was a comparative analysis of the rights and obligations of customs authorities and their officials with the rights and obligations of participants in foreign economic activity, in particular, declarants, persons subject to customs inspection, and other participants. The novelty of the research lies in the formation and justification of the principle of "mirror reflection" when introducing the rights and obligations of the main counterparties in customs. The study revealed a discrepancy between the rights and obligations of the parties, both in the context of the relations "customs authorities – participants in foreign economic activity", and when comparing the rights and obligations of each of the parties. It was also shown that they are not presented systematically and in full in regulatory legal acts, and their implementation is hindered by the lack of an effective mechanism. The results of the study can be used by the legislative power of the country to amend customs legislation and customs authorities to regulate relations with participants in foreign economic activity. The article develops recommendations for improving the legal basis of relations for customs entities, in particular, it is proposed to bring the rights and obligations of the parties into full compliance, as well as to justify the mechanism of their action within each right and obligation.
参考
Рубцова, М.В. Типичные нарушения прав участников ВЭД при осуществлении таможенными органами административно-юрисдикционной деятельности // Таможенное дело. – 2017. – № 1. – С. 24-27. Рубцова, М.В. Типичные нарушения прав участников ВЭД, выявляемые транспортными прокурорами // Законность. – 2017. – № 7 (993). – С. 32-35. Воронин, А.А. Взаимодействие таможенных органов и участников ВЭД в международной цепи поставок товаров: проблемы и перспективы развития / А.А. Воронин, П.А. Третьяков // NovaUm.Ru. – 2018. – № 15. – С. 37-42. Тактарова, С.В. О классической услуге в таможенном деле / С.В. Тактарова, Е.В. Шишкина // Таможенное дело и внешнеэкономическая деятельность компаний. – 2017. – № 1 (2). – С. 195-207. Мусаева, Г.М. Таможенные органы Российской Федерации как субъекты административной юрисдикционной деятельности // Юридический вестник ДГУ. – 2018. – Т. 25. – № 1. – С. 72-77. Арский, А.А. Проблемы защиты прав на объекты интеллектуальной собственности таможенными органами // Вестник Московского гуманитарно-экономического института. – 2018. – № 4. – С. 16-20. Алексеев, А.П. Защита прав на товарные знаки таможенными органами на территории ЕАЭС: проблемы теории и практики // Евразийский юридический журнал. – 2018. – № 7 (122). – С. 18-20. Трошкина, Т.Н. Способы обеспечения исполнения обязанности по уплате таможенных платежей в ЕАЭС // Законы России: опыт, анализ, практика. – 2020. – № 10. – С. 61-70. Naigen, Z. Goods in transit: Enforcement of ip rights by customs officers // Asia Pacific Law Review. – 2012. – no. 20 (2). – pp. 257-275. – doi: 10.1080/10192557.2012.11788263. Bulajic, M. Protection of intellectual property rights and foreign trade (Uruguay round) (Book Chapter) // Foreign Trade in the Present and a New International Economic Order. – 2019. – pp. 292-300. – doi: 10.4324/9780429033391-22. Romanova, V.V. Main pipeline transportation of oil and oil products: Legal regulation tendencies // Neftyanoe Khozyaystvo – Oil Industry. – 2018. – no. 2. – pp. 12-16. – doi: 10.24887/0028-2448-2018-2-12-16. Mindagulov, A. The mode of government service in custom authorities // World Applied Sciences Journal. – 2013. – no. 25 (11). – pp. 1608-1611. – doi: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.25.11.13439. Григорьева, Т.А. Нравственно-правовое самоопределение будущего специалиста таможенного дела: сущность, структура и содержание / Т.А. Григорьева, В.Н. Кормакова // Балтийский гуманитарный журнал. – 2018. – Т. 7. – № 3 (24). – С. 187-190. Терехова, Е.А. Аспект добросовестности при таможенном регулировании деятельности предприятий России – участников внешнеэкономической деятельности // Региональная экономика и управление: электронный научный журнал. – 2020. – № 2 (62). – С. 7. Krupchan, O.D. Economic activity of legal entities: Elimination of the dualism of legal regulation in the context of convergence with European private law / O.D. Krupchan, O.O. Haidulin, V.V. Kochyn, M.V. Bernatskyi, K.A. Kochyna // Asia Life Sciences. – 2020. – no. 1. – pp. 1-19. Dashin, A. Legal conditions for integration of regional companies in foreign economic activities / A. Dashin, I. Petrov, E. Simatova, O. Shapoval // Contributions to Economics. – 2017. – pp. 113-127. – doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-60696-5_14. Beesley, C. Globalization and corruption in post-Soviet countries: Perverse effects of economic openness // Eurasian Geography and Economics. – 2015. – no. 56 (2). – pp. 170-192. – doi: 10.1080/15387216.2015.1082923. Cantens, T. Is it possible to reform a customs administration? The role of the customs elite on the reform process in Cameroon / Т. Cantens, A.H. Amsden, A. Di Caprio, J.A. Robinson // The role of elites in economic development. – Oxford: Oxford University Press. – 2012. – pp. 281-306. – doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659036.003.0012
补充文件
