Email this article New approaches in the study of risk factors and treatment of implant-associated complications in pelvic organ prolapse
- Authors: Berg P.A.1, Musin I.I.1, Yaschuk A.G.1, Naftulovich R.A.1, Battalova G.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- Bashkir State University
- Issue: Vol 24, No 1 (2022)
- Pages: 65-68
- Section: ORIGINAL ARTICLE
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2079-5831/article/view/96177
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/20795696.2022.1.201362
- ID: 96177
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Aim. To assessment of risk factors for erosion of the vaginal mucosa after the use of mesh prostheses to correct genital prolapse.
Materials and methods. The authors of this article evaluated modifiable and unmodifiable risk factors for erosion of the vaginal mucosa after the use of a mesh implant to correct pelvic prolapse. The analysis of the relationship between the indicators of obstetric-gynecological, somatic anamnesis in women with an implant-associated complication (erosion of the vaginal mucosa, n=25) and in women with successful surgical treatment of genital prolapse using a mesh prosthesis (n=58) was carried out. The STATISTICA 10.0 and EViews 12.0 software packages were used for statistical processing of the obtained results.
Results. Statistical analysis revealed the relationship of vaginal erosion after the use of a mesh prosthesis in the surgical correction of genital prolapse with the presence of factors such as: premenopausal age at the time of surgery (p=0.002; odds ratio – OR 4.7, relative risk – RR 2.79), vaginal delivery over the age of 35 years (p=0.003; OR 6.35, RR 2.78), episiotomy in the anamnesis (p<0.0001; OR 11.2, RR 6.19), perineal ruptures III degrees in anamnesis (p<0.0001; OR 19.7, RR 6.57), hypertension (p=0.049; OR 2.79, RR 2.19), type 2 diabetes mellitus (p=0.007; OR 4.99, RR 1.82).
Conclusion. The formation of a high-risk group for erosion of the vaginal mucosa will allow us to develop a set of preventive measures and improve the outcomes of surgical treatment of genital prolapse.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Polina A. Berg
Bashkir State University
Email: p.a.berg@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5266-0412
Assistant
Russian Federation, UfaIlnur I. Musin
Bashkir State University
Email: ilnur-musin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5520-5845
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, UfaAlfiya G. Yaschuk
Bashkir State University
Email: alfiya_galimovna@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6725-2603
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.
Russian Federation, UfaRaisa A. Naftulovich
Bashkir State University
Email: ag2@bashgmu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2893-4844
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, UfaGuzel Yu. Battalova
Bashkir State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: p.a.berg@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1641-9952
D. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, UfaReferences
- Mattsson NK, Karjalainen PK, Tolppanen A-M, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and quality of life–a nationwide cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(6):588.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1285
- Буянова С.Н., Щукина Н.А., Петросян Е.И., Дуб Н.В. Тактика ведения пациенток с рубцовой деформацией и элонгацией шейки матки в сочетании с несостоятельностью мышц тазового дна. Российский вестник акушера- гинеколога. 2020;20(4):52-7 [Buyanova SN, Schukina NA, Petrosyan EI, Dub NV. Management tactics for patients with cicatricial deformity and elongation of the cervix in combination with pelvic floor weakness. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2020;20(4):52-7 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.17116/rosakush20202004152
- Ищенко А.И., Александров Л.С., Ищенко А.А., и др. Mesh-лигатурная коррекция пролапса задней стенки влагалища II–III степени при помощи сетчатых титановых имплантатов. Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2020;19(3):14-21 [Ishchenko AI, Aleksandrov LS, Ishchenko AA, et al. Mesh-ligature correction of posterior vaginal wall prolapse grade II–III using titanium mesh implants. Vopr. ginekol. akus. perinatol. (Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology). 2020;19(3):14-21 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.20953/1726-1678-2020-3-14-21
- Dällenbach P, De Oliveira SS, Marras S, Boulvain M. Incidence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic repair of pelvic organ prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(9):1347-55. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-2974-z
- Deng T, Liao B, Luo D, et al. Risk factors for mesh erosion after female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2016;117(2):323-43. doi: 10.1111/bju.13158
- Ganer Herman H, Raz N, Gold E, et al. Risk of Mesh Erosion after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair with or without Concomitant Vaginal Hysterectomy. Isr Med Assoc J. 2019;21(6):399-403.
- MacCraith E, Cunnane EM, Joyce M, et al. Comparison of synthetic mesh erosion and chronic pain rates after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(3):573-80. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04612-x
- Kim TY, Jeon MJ. Risk factors for vaginal mesh erosion after sacrocolpopexy in Korean women. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0228566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228566
- Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, et al; Systematic Review Group of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(7):789-98. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1384-5
- Беженарь В.Ф., Паластин П.М., Толибова Г.Х. Эрозии влагалища в отдаленные сроки после постановки синтетических имплантатов при гинекологических операциях. РМЖ. Медицинское обозрение. 2018;2(10):17-21 [Bezhenar VF, Palastin PM, Tolibova GKh. Vaginal erosion at a long time after synthetic implants insertion during gynecological surgery. RMJ. Medical Review. 2018;2(10):17-21 (in Russian)].
Supplementary files
