The prolonged regime: contraceptive and non-contraceptive benefits
- Authors: Karakhalis L.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 19, No 6 (2017)
- Pages: 54-56
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2075-1753/article/view/94786
- ID: 94786
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
L. Yu Karakhalis
Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: lomela@mail.ru
д-р мед. наук, проф., проф. каф. акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии ФПК и ППС ФГБОУ ВО КубГМУ 350063, Russian Federation, Krasnodar, ul. Sedina, d. 4
References
- Schlaff W.D, Lynch A.M, Hughes H.D et al. Manipulation of the pill - free interval in oral contraceptive pill users: the effects on follicular suppression. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 943-51.
- Sulak P.J, Scow R.D, Preece C et al. Hormone withdrawal symptoms in oral contraceptive users. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 261-6.
- Coffee A, Kuehl T.K, Willis S.A, Sulak P.J. Oral contraceptives and premenstrualsymptoms: comparisonof a 21/7 and extendedregimen. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1311-9.
- Vandever M.A, Kuehl T.J, Sulak P.J et al. Evaluation ofpituitary - ovarian axis suppression withthree oral contraceptive regimens. Contraception 2008; 77 (3): 162-70.
- Edelman A.B, Gallo M.F, Jensen J.T et al. Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined oral contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 3: CD004695.
- Yonkers K.A, Brown C, Pearlstein T.B et al. Efficacy of a new low dose oral contraceptive with drospirenone in premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 492-501.
- Archer D.F, Jensen J.T, Johnson J.V et al. Evaluation of a continuous regimen of levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol: phase 3 studyresults. Contraception 2006; 74 (6): 439-45.
- Davis A.R, Kroll R, Soltes B et al. Return to menses after continuous use of a low - dose oral contraceptive. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 3S.
- Den Tonkelaar I, Oddens B.J. Preferred frequency and characteristics of menstrual bleeding in relation to reproductive status, oral contraceptive use, and hormone replacement therapy use. Contraception 1999; 59: 357-62.
- Andrist L/C, Arias R/D, Nucatola D et al. Women’s and providers’ attitudes toward menstrual suppression with extended use of oral contraceptives. Contraception 2004; 70: 359-63.
- Glasier A.F, Smith K.B, van der Spuy Z.M et al. Amenorrhea associated with contraception - an international study on acceptability. Contraception 2003; 67: 1-8.
- Sulak P.J, Cressman B.E, Waldrop E et al. Extending the duration of active oral contraceptive pills to manage hormone withdrawal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 179-83.
- Sulak P.J, Kuehl T.J, Ortiz M, Shull B.L. Acceptance of altering the standard 21 - day/7 - day oral contraceptive regimen to delay menses and reduce hormone withdrawal symptoms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 1142-9.
- Shakespeare J, Neve E, Hodder K. Is norethisterone a lifestyle drug? Results of database analysis. BMJ 2000; 320: 291.
- Anderson F.D, Hait H the Seasonale-301 Study Group. A multicenter, randomized study of an extended cycle oral contraceptive. Contraception 2003; 68: 89-96.
- Miller L, Hughes J.P. Continuous combination oral contraceptive pills to eliminate withdrawal bleeding: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 653-61.
- Аrcher D.F, Kovalevsky G, Ballagh S, Grubb G.S. Effect on ovarian activity of a continuous - use regimen of oral levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol. Fertil Steril 2005; 84 (Suppl.): S24.
- Sullivan H, Furniss H, Spona J, Elstein M. Effect of 21-day and 24-day oral contraceptive regimens containing gestodene (60 microg) and ethinyl estradiol (15 microg) on ovarian activity. Fertil Steril 1999; 72 (1): 115-20.
- Spona J, Elstein M, Feichtinger W et al. Shorter pill - freeinterval in combined oral contraceptives decreases follicular development. Contraception 1996; 54 (2): 71-7.
- Trussell J. Contraceptive efficacy. In: Hatcher R.A, Trussell J, Nelson A.L et al, editors. Contraceptive Technology, 19th revisededition. New York NY: Ardent Media, 2007; p. 747-56.
- Shrader S.P, Dickerson L.M. Extended - and Continuous - Cycle Oral Contraceptives. Pharmacotherapy 2008; 28 (8): 1033-40.
- Walker A.M. Newer oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thromboembolism. Contraception 1998; 57 (3): 169-81.
- Hennessy S, Berlin J.A, Kinman J.L et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism from oral contraceptives containing gestodene and desogestrel versus levonorgestrel: a meta - analysis and formal sensitivity analysis. Contraception 2001; 64 (2): 125-33.
- Kemmeren J.M, Algra A, Grobbee D.E. Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thrombosis: meta - analysis. BMJ 2001; 323 (7305): 131-4.
- Jick S, Hernandez. Risk of non - fatal venous thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives containing drospirenone compared with women using oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel case - control study using United States claims data. BMJ 2011; 342: d2151.
- Parkin, Sharples, Hernandez, Jick. Risk of venous thromboembolism in users of oral contraceptives containing drospirenone or levonorgestrel: nested case - control study based on UK General Practice Research Database. BMJ 2011; 342: d2139.
- Lidegaard O. Maturitas 2013; 74: 1-2.
- Vinogradova Y et al. BMJ 2015; 350: h2135.
- ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins - Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin. No. 73: Use of hormonal contraception in women withcoexisting medical conditions. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107 (6): 1453-72.
- Department of Reproductive Health, World Health Organization. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. 4th ed. 2009. http://www.who. int/reproductivehealth /publications/family_planning/9789241563888/en/index.html
- Kaunitz A. Hormonal Contraception in Women of Older Reproductive Age. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1262-70.
- Sidney S, Siscovick D.S, Petitti D.B et al. Myocardial infarction and use of low - dose oral contraceptives: a pooled analysis of 2 US studies. Circulation 1998; 98: 1058-63.
- Schwartz S.M, Petitti D.B, Siscovick D.S et al. Stroke and use of low - dose oral contraceptives in young women: a pooled analysis of two US studies. Stroke 1998; 29: 2277-84.
- Cardoso F, Polonia J, Santos A et al. Low - dose oral contraceptives and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997; 59: 237-43.
- Petitti D.B. Clinical practice. Combinationestrogen - progestin oral contraceptives [published correction appears in N Engl J Med 2004; 350 (1): 92]. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 (15): 1443-50.
- Gold R. Rekindling efforts to prevent unplanned pregnancy: A matter of “equity and common sense”. Guttmacher Policy Rev 2006; 9: 2-6.
- Davis S.R, Bitzer J, Giraldi A et al. Change to either a nonandrogenic or androgenic progestin - containing oral contraceptive preparation s associated with improved sexual function in women with oral contraceptive - associated sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med 2013; 10 (12): 3069-79.
- Nappi R.E, Davis S.R, Parke S et al. Effects of Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest Compared with Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel on Libido. Endocr Rev; 32 (03_MeetingAbstracts): P1-315.
- Munro M.G, Critchley H.O, Broder M.S et al. FIGO classification system (PALM COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 113: 3-13.
- Krishnan S, Kiley J. The lowest - dose, extended - cycle combined oral contraceptive pill with continuous ethinyl estradiol in the United States: a review of the literature on ethinyl estradiol 20 mg/levonorgestrel 100 mg + ethinyl estradiol 10 mg. Int J Women’s Health 2010; 2: 235-9.
Supplementary files
