Judicial Detention Decisions: Problems Encountered When They Are Made
- Authors: Kalinkina L.D.1
-
Affiliations:
- National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
- Issue: Vol 15, No 6 (2022)
- Pages: 187-190
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2072-3164/article/view/147733
- ID: 147733
Cite item
Abstract
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Lyubov Danilovna Kalinkina
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Email: ldkal@rambler.ru
Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Honorary Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Honored Lawyer of the Republic of Mordovia, Head of the Criminal Procedure, Justice and prosecutorial supervision Department, Law institute Saransk, Russian Federation
References
- Chervotkin A.S. New clarifications of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the application of preventive measures // Criminal process. 2020. No. 8. P. 24.
- Davletov A.A., Azarenok N.V. A turn in the practice of choosing detention as a measure of restraint? // Russian justice. 2018. No. 9. pp. 59-60.
- Skabelin S.I. The totality of data that is sufficient to select a measure of restraint in criminal proceedings // Lawyer. 2015. No. 11. P. 39.
- Shadrina E.G. On the issue of the need to expand the permissible limits of judicial control (on the example of choosing a measure of restraint in the form of detention) // Russian judge. 2018. No. 5. pp. 41-42.
- Archive of the Leninsky district court of Saransk. 2021 // Material No. 3/2-103/2021.
- Archive of the Leninsky district court of Saransk. 2021 // Material No. 3/2-104/2021.
Supplementary files
