Modern youth perceptions of marriage: power-role status and relationship models
- Autores: Ivanishko A.M.1, Rozenberg N.V.1
-
Afiliações:
- Penza State University
- Edição: Nº 3 (2025)
- Páginas: 54-63
- Seção: SOCIOLOGY
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2072-3016/article/view/361332
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.21685/2072-3016-2025-3-4
- ID: 361332
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
Background. The desire to individualize family roles is blurring the boundaries between traditional spousal roles, leaving room for new types of marriage relationships. Young people's ideas about power and role dynamics in marriage reflect the changing values of young adults. The purpose of this study is to sociologically analyze and typologize young people's views on marriage and the balance of power and roles within marriages. Materials and methods. The study of the types of marital relations preferred by the youth of Penza region is based on the materials of author’s qualitative and quantitative sociological research conducted in 2023 and 2025. Results. The main trends in the attitudes of boys and girls towards the distribution of rights and responsibilities in a married couple have been considered. The types of marital relationships that prevail among young people in Penza region have been identified and their prevalence has been determined. Features of the social profiles of young people who prefer certain types of marital relationships have been high-lighted and analyzed. Conclusions. Modern youth is focused on the idea of partnership in marital relationships, but the reality of implementing this concept is limited. While partner-ship is an ideal concept, in real life, a hybrid type of marital relationship often prevails, combining elements of egalitarianism and patriarchy.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
Anna Ivanishko
Penza State University
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: annadeenn@gmail.com
Candidate of sociological sciences, associate professor of the sub-department of philosophy and social communications
(40 Krasnaya street, Penza, Russia)Natal'ya Rozenberg
Penza State University
Email: rozenbergnv@mail.ru
Doctor of philosophical sciences, professor, head of the sub-department of philosophy and social communications
(40 Krasnaya street, Penza, Russia)Bibliografia
- Gurko T.A. Theoretical approaches to the study of the transformation of the family in-stitution. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal = Sociological journal. 2020;(1):31–54. (In Russ.)
- Rozhkova L.V., Dubina A.Sh. Family values of modern youth. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Sotsiologiya. Politologiya = Proceedings of Saratov University. New series. Series: Sociology. Politology. 2023;23(2):138–142. (In Russ.)
- Rostovskaya T.K., Kuchmayeva O.V. Conceptual aspects of the national project “Fami-ly”. Zhenshchina v rossiyskom obshchestve = Women in Russian society. 2025;(1):49–61. (In Russ.)
- Rostovskaya T.K., Kuchmayeva O.V., Vasilyeva E.N. The institution of multigenera-tional families as a reserve for Russia’s demographic development. Demograficheskiye issledovaniya = Demographic research. 2023;3(4):59–77. (In Russ.)
- Kuznetsov V.O., Savelyeva Zh.V. Family model and family-gender roles in the assess-ments of modern youth. Kazanskiy sotsialno-gumanitarnyy vestnik = Kazan social and humanitarian bulletin. 2024;(1):70–77. (In Russ.)
- Lubkova A.A. Features of communication and attitudes of spouses in families with child-centered and egalitarian models. Voprosy psikhologii ekstremalnykh situatsiy = Is-sues of psychology of extreme situations. 2023;(2):69–74. (In Russ.)
- Polomoshnov A.F., Polomoshnov P.A. Sociocultural types of Russian families. Guman-itarnyy vestnik Donskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Humanitarian Bulletin of the Don State Agrarian University. 2023;(2):114–129. (In Russ.)
- Dorno I.V. Sovremennyy brak: problemy i garmoniya = Modern marriage: issues and harmony. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1990:267. (In Russ.)
- Sorokin P.A. Glavnyye tendentsii nashego vremeni = The main trends of our time. Translated from English, afterword, and appendix by T.S. Vasilyeva. Moscow: Nauka, 1997:350. (In Russ.)
- Golod S.I. Prospects for a monogamous family: a comparative cross-cultural analysis. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii = Journal of sociology and social anthro-pology. 2003;(2):106–119. (In Russ.)
- Golod S.I. Stabilnost semi: sotsiologicheskiy i demograficheskiy aspekt = Family stabil-ity: sociological and demographic aspects. Leningrad: Nauka, 1984:136. (In Russ.)
- Golod S.I. Sociological and demographic analysis of the state and evolution of the fami-ly. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological research. 2008;(1):40–49. (In Russ.)
- Pahl J. His money, her money: Recent research on financial organization in marriage. Journal of Economic Psychology. 1995;(16):361–376.
- Olson D.H. Circumplex model of Marital & Family systems. The Journal of Family Therapy. 2000;(22):144–167.
- Ilinykh S.A. Family values of youth: traditions and transformations. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philophy. Sociology. Politology. 2012;(4):220–232. (In Russ.)
Arquivos suplementares

