Codification of military medical ethics in the Russian Federation and the USA

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This paper provides a theoretical analysis of the phenomenon of war from the perspective of modern ethics. The authors examine four main approaches to assessing the moral aspects of warfare: realism, militarism, pacifism and just war theory. Each of these approaches has its own characteristics and is critically analysed by them. Particular attention is paid to the ethics of military medicine, which faces a number of specific problems in military conflicts. In the article, the authors raise the issue of the need to develop a code of military medical ethics. To this end, the vectors of codification of military medicine ethics at the international level, in particular in the USA, are investigated and possible conceptual foundations for the development of principles of military medical ethics in Russia are discussed. The issues of dual loyalty of military medics, the need for ethical principles in extreme conditions, and the contradictions between military necessity and medical indications are discussed. The authors emphasise that the proposed ethical principles in the code of military medical ethics should be based primarily on the position of moral realism. The results of the study can be considered the ideas of complementarity between the codification of Russian military-medical ethics and strategies for cultivating the moral competence of military medics. Such an approach will prevent the erosion of moral ethos and promote adherence to the ethical principles of military medicine. The authors emphasise the importance of balancing military and medical values, the need for specialised training of medics in ethical conflicts and the development of mechanisms for ethical compliance in combat situations. The authors note that defence of the homeland must include the defence of humanity even in war, as military values serve as a context for medicine's primary goal of preserving life and health, even when this is not possible. The work is of interest to specialists in ethics, military medicine and international relations, as well as to all those interested in morality and war.

About the authors

Maxim A. Odnostalko

S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy

Email: odnostalko@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-0292-5987

Senior Lecturer at the Department of Military and Political Work in the Armed Forces

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

Butidma B. Dondokova

S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy

Author for correspondence.
Email: lira-81@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3211-6430

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Military and Political Work in the Military (Forces),

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

References

  1. London L., Rubenstein L.S., Baldwin-Ragaven L., Van E.A. Dual loyalty among military health professionals: human rights and ethics in times of armed conflict. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2006;15(4):381–391. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/6729008_Dual_Loyalty_among_Military_Health_ Professionals_Human_Rights_and_Ethics_in_Times_of_Armed_ Conflict.
  2. Eagan Sh.M., Messelken D. Resource Scarcity in Austere Environments: An Ethical Examination of Triage and Medical Rules of Eligibility. Springer Verlag, 2023. 290 p.
  3. Gignoux-Froment F., Martinez T., Derely J., Turc J., Corcostegui S.-P., Derkenne C. et al. Ethical Dilemmas Faced by Military Health Personnel During High-Intensity Conflict: The Crucial Issue of Triage. URL: https://colab.ws/articles/ 10.1093%2Fmilmed%2Fusae165.
  4. Weiss T.G. Ethical quandaries in war zones, when mass atrocity prevention fails. Glob Policy. 2016;7:135–145. URL: https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/articles/conflict-and-security/ ethical-quandaries-war-zones-when-mass-atrocity-prevention-fails.
  5. Crosby S.S., Apovian C.M., Grodin M.A. Hunger strikes, force-feeding, and physicians' responsibilities. JAMA. 2007;298(5):563–566. URL: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/ jama/article-abstract/208176.
  6. Schneider B.J., Bradley J.C., Benedek D.M. Psychiatric Medications for Deployment: An Update. Military Medicine. 2007;172(7):681–685. URL: https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED. 172.7.681.
  7. Jecker N.S., Atuire С., Ravitsky V., Behrens К., Ghaly М. War, Bioethics, and Public Health. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2024;22. URL: https://www.thehastingscenter.org/ bioethics-must-address-war-as-a-public-health-crisis.
  8. Broussard G., Rubenstein L.S., Robinson C. Maziak W., Gilbert S.Z., DeCam М. Challenges to ethical obligations and humanitarian principles in conflict settings: a systematic review. Int J Humanitarian Action. 2019;15(4). URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-019-0063-x.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Odnostalko M.A., Dondokova B.B.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).