The ethical issues of neurotechnologies
- Authors: Davtyan S.A.1, Mesropyan V.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Yerevan State Medical University named after Mkhitar Heratsi
- Issue: Vol 18, No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 14-20
- Section: Theoretical bioethics
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2070-1586/article/view/382510
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.19163/2070-1586-2025-18-2-14-20
- ID: 382510
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The main objective of the presented article is to consider the features of neuroethics as an emerging scientific problem. Neuroethics is examined from various perspectives. On the one hand, it is presented as a new topic in bioethics, while on the other, it is explored as a component of modern medical innovations known as «human enhancement». The social, economical and political consequences of the use of neurotechnologies in different fields of life are also analyzed. The need for critical reflection and ethical regulation of the use of neurotechnologies, especially directed by organizations as UNESCO are emphasized. This article proposes an enlarged understanding of the neurorights in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Neurorights are a new category of rights that protect mental integrity from the exploitation of neurotechnologies. The study's findings are important for understanding modern legal concepts related to neurorights and adapting the existing norms to address ethical and social issues related to new technologies. The authors support the use of ethical concepts such as personal identification, free choice, mental autonomy, equal access and bias prevention. Issues related to mental autonomy include improper information handling, lack of legal security guarantees and violations of medical rights and freedoms. Studying these concerns is crucial for promoting appropriate neurotechnology development and use. The article highlights the importance of establishing clear ethical principles to protect individual rights and promote responsible use of neurotechnologies as well as the necessity to modify current regulatory frameworks to meet ethical and societal concerns related to emerging neurotechnologies.
About the authors
Susanna A. Davtyan
Yerevan State Medical University named after Mkhitar Heratsi
Author for correspondence.
Email: susannadavtyan47@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8881-3994
PhD, Professor, Senior Lecturer, Professor of the Department of Social Sciences
Armenia, YerevanVilena V. Mesropyan
Yerevan State Medical University named after Mkhitar Heratsi
Email: mesropyanm@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5901-498X
PhD student, Lecturer of the Department of Social Sciences
Russian Federation, YerevanReferences
- Davtyan S.A. Intradaction to Bioethics. Monography. Yerevan, 2012. 329 р.
- Davtyan S.A Bioethics. Handout. Yerevan, 2013. 189 р.
- Davtyan S.A. Experimental Course of Bioethics Upon the Bioethics Curriculum of UNESCO: Methodology and Result of Investigation. International Journal Medicine and Law. 2012;31(4):495–513.
- Davtyan S.A. Ethical Review System for Biomedical Research in the Republic of Armenia (Historical and Cultural Background, Legal Regulations, Education in Bioethics, Perspectives and forms of International Cooperation), in Ethical Review of Bio-medical Research in CIS Countries (Social and Cultural Aspects). Saint Petersburg, 2007:89–103. (In Russ.).
- Ienca M. From Healthcare to Warfare and Reverse: How Should We Regulate Dual-Use Neurotechnology? Neuron. 2018;2:269–274.
- Roskies A. Neuroethics for the New Millenium. Neuron. 2002;35:21–23.
- Maloy S., Hughes K. (eds.). Brenner's Encyclopedia of Genetics (2nd ed.). London; Academic Press, 2013. 4368 р.
- Safire W. Visions for a new field of “Neuroethics”. Neuroethics: Mapping the Field Conference Proceedings, May 13–14, 2002, San Francisco, California. New York; The Dana Press, 2002:3–9.
- Wolpe P. Neuroethics. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. 3rd ed. Vol. 3. New York; The Gale Group, 2004:1895–1898.
- Fins J. Toward a Pragmatic Neuroethics in Theory and Practice. Debates About Neuroethics Perspectives on Its Development, Focus and Future. New York; Springer International Publishing AG, 2017:45–66.
- Davtyan S.A. Human Rights and Dignity as Bioethical Problem. Legal and Ethical Challenges of Biomedicine. Yerevan, 2017:29–37.
- Levy N. Neuroethics: Challenge for the 21st Century. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press Publ., 2007. 364 p.
- Ackerman S. Hard science, hard choices: facts, ethics, and policies guiding brain science today. New York; Dana Press, 2006. 152 p.
- Hyman S.E. The diagnosis of mental disorders: the problem of reification. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2010;27(6):155–179.
- Dees R.H. Better Brains, Better Selves? The Ethics of Neuroenhancements. 2007;17(4):371–395.
- Forlini C., Hall W. Navigating the enhancement landscape, Ethical issues in research on cognitive enhancers for healthy individuals. EMBO Rep. 2013;14(2):123–128.
- McMahan J. Cognitive Disability and Cognitive Enhancement. Metaphilosophy. 2009;40(3):582–605.
- Metzinger T. The Ego Tunnel – The Science of the Mind and the Myth of the Self Basic Books. New York, 2009. 288 р.
Supplementary files

