Social and Business Innovations: Are Common Measurement Approaches Possible?

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article reviews various approaches to measuring business innovation with the aim of drawing lessons for measuring social innovations, and offers several methodological and policy conclusions. First, Innovation Union Scoreboard (IUS) indicators, in principle, could be useful in settings where the dominant mode of innovation is based on RD activities. In practice, however, both RD and non-RD-based modes of innovation are important. IUS, therefore, only provides a partial picture. Social innovations can rely on RD-based technological innovations;their essence, however, tends to be organizational, managerial, andbehavioural changes. The IUS indicators do not capture these types of changes. Second, an assessment of the 81 indicators used to compile the Global Innovation Index reveals that it would not be fruitful to rely on such indicators to capture social innovations. Third, given the diversity among innovation systems, a poor performance signalled by a composite indicator does not automatically identify the area(s) necessitating the most urgent policy actions; only tailored, thorough comparative analyses can do so. Finally, analysts and policy makers need to be aware of the differences between measuring (i) social innovation activities (or efforts); (ii) the framework for social innovations (pre-requisites, available inputs, skills, norms, values, behavioural patterns, etc.); and (iii) the economic, societal, and environmental impacts of social innovations.

About the authors

Attila Havas

Institute of Economics

Email: havas.attila@krtk.mta.hu
Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1112, Budaörsi út 45 Budapest, Hungary

References

  1. Arrow K.J. (1962) The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing // The Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 29. № 3. P. 155-173.
  2. Balconi M., Brusoni S., Orsenigo L. (2010) In defence of the linear model: An essay // Research Policy. Vol. 39. № 1. P. 1-13.
  3. Baumol W., Litan R., Schramm C. (2007) Good Capitalism, Bad Capitalism, and the Economics of Growth and Prosperity. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  4. Baumol W.J. (2002) The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the growth miracle of capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  5. Bender G., Jacobson D., Robertson P.L. (2005) Non-Research-Intensive Industries in the Knowledge Economy // Perspectives on Economic and Social Integration. Vol. XI. № 1-2. P. 49-73.
  6. Bleda M., del Río P. (2013) The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems // Research Policy. Vol. 42. № 5. P. 1039-1052.
  7. Budd C.H., Naastepad C.W.M., Beers C. (eds.) (2015) Report on Institutions, Social Innovation & System Dynamics from the Perspective of the Marginalised (CRESSI Working Papers № 1/ 2015). Oxford: University of Oxford.
  8. Bund E., Hubrich D-K., Schmitz B., Mildenberger G., Krlev G. (2013) Blueprint of social innovation metrics - Contributions to an understanding of opportunities and challenges of social innovation measurement (deliverable 2.4 of the TEPSIE project: The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe, European Commission 7th Framework Programme). Brussels: European Commission.
  9. Bush V. (1945) Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office.
  10. Caraça J., Lundvall B-Å., Mendonça S. (2009) The changing role of science in the innovation process: From Queen to Cinderella? // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 76. № 6. P. 861-867.
  11. Castellacci F. (2008a) Innovation and the competitiveness of industries: Comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 75. № 7. P. 984-1006.
  12. Castellacci F. (2008b) Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation // Research Policy. Vol. 37. № 6-7. P. 978-994.
  13. Chiappero-Martinetti E. (2015) Relationship between innovation/technology and human development (contribution to WP3 of the CrESSI project). Pavia (mimeo).
  14. Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO (2014) The Global Innovation Index 2014: The Human Factor in Innovation. Fontainebleau; Ithaca; Geneva: Cornell University; INSEAD; WIPO.
  15. Desai M., Fukuda-Parr S., Johansson J., Sagasti F. (2002) Measuring Technology Achievement of Nations and the Capacity to Participate in the Network Age // Journal of Human Development. Vol. 3. № 1. P. 95-122.
  16. Di Stefano G., Gambardella A., Verona G. (2012) Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions // Research Policy. Vol. 41. № 8. P. 1283-1295.
  17. Dodgson M., Gann D.M., Phillips N. (eds.) (2014) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Dodgson M., Rothwell R. (eds.) (1994) The Handbook of Industrial Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  19. Dosi G. (1988a) The nature of the innovative process. Technical Change and Economic Theory / Eds. G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R.R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, L. Soete. London: Pinter. P. 221-238.
  20. Dosi G. (1988b) Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation // Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 24. № 4. P. 1120-1171.
  21. Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R.R., Silverberg G., Soete L. (eds.) (1988) Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter.
  22. Edquist C. (2011) Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: Identification of systemic problems or (failures) // Industrial and Corporate Change. Vol. 20. № 6. P. 1725-1753.
  23. Edquist C. (ed.) (1997) Systems of Innovations: Technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter.
  24. Edquist C., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia J.M. (2015) The Innovation Union Scoreboard is Flawed: The case of Sweden - Not being the innovation leader of the EU (CIRCLE Papers in Innovation Studies. № 2015/16). Lund: Lund University.
  25. Ergas H. (1986) Does Technology Policy Matter? Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS Paper № 29). Brussels: European Commission.
  26. Ergas H. (1987) The importance of technology policy // Economic Policy and Technological Performance / Eds. P. Dasgupta, P. Stoneman. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge UP. P. 51-96.
  27. European Commission (2002) 2002 European Innovation Scoreboard (Technical Paper № 6, Methodology Report). Brussels: European Commission, Enterprise Directorate-General.
  28. European Commission (2013) Innovation Union Scoreboard 2013. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry.
  29. European Commission (2015) Innovation Union Scoreboard 2014. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs.
  30. Eurostat (2012) Results of the community innovation survey 2012 (CIS2012). Paris: Eurostat. Режим доступа:http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/inn_cis8_esms.htm, дата обращения 23.07.2015.
  31. Fagerberg J., Fosaas M., Bell M., Martin B. (2011) Christopher Freeman: Social Science Entrepreneur // Research Policy. Vol. 40. № 7. P. 897-916.
  32. Fagerberg J., Landström H., Martin B. (2012) Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base // Research Policy. Vol. 41. № 7. P. 1132-1153.
  33. Fagerberg J., Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R. (eds.) (2005) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  34. Foray D. (ed.) (2009) The New Economics of Technology Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  35. Freeman C. (1991) Networks of innovators, a synthesis of research issues // Research Policy. Vol. 20. № 5. P. 499-514.
  36. Freeman C. (1994) The economics of technical change: A critical survey // Cambridge Journal of Economics. Vol. 18. № 5. P. 463-514.
  37. Freeman C. (1995) The "National System of Innovation" in historical perspective // Cambridge Journal of Economics. Vol. 19. № 1. P. 5-24.
  38. Freeman C., Soete L. (1997) The Economics of Industrial Innovation (3rd edition). London: Pinter.
  39. Godin B. (2006) The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework // Science, Technology & Human Values. Vol. 31. № 6. P. 639-667.
  40. Godin B. (2008) The moral economy of technology indicators // Innovation in Low-Tech Firms and Industries / Eds. H. Hirsch-Kreinsen, D. Jacobson. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. P. 64-84.
  41. Grupp H. (1998) Foundations of the Economics of Innovation: Theory, measurement and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  42. Grupp H., Schubert T. (2010) Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance // Research Policy. Vol. 39. № 1. P. 67-78.
  43. Hall B.H., Rosenberg N. (eds.) (2010) Economics of Innovation. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  44. Hatzichronoglou T. (1997) Revision of the High-Technology Sector and Product Classification (OECD STI Working Papers, 1997/2). Paris: OECD.
  45. Havas A. (2015a) The persistent high-tech myth in the EC policy circles: Implications for the EU10 countries (Institute of Economics CERS HAS Discussion Papers MT-DP - 2015/17). Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
  46. Havas A. (2015b) How does social innovation challenge neo-classical assumptions regarding technological innovation? // Report Contrasting CrESSI's Approach of Social Innovation with that of Neoclassical Economics / Eds. C. Houghton Budd, C.W.M. Naastepad, C.P. van Beers (CrESSI Report D1.3). Oxford: Oxford University. P. 40-46.
  47. Havas A. (2015c) Various approaches to measuring business innovation: their relevance for capturing social innovation (Institute of Economics CERS HAS Discussion Papers MT-DP - 2015/54). Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
  48. Hirsch-Kreinsen H., Jacobson D. (eds.) (2008) Innovation in Low-Tech Firms and Industries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  49. Hirsch-Kreinsen H., Jacobson D., Laestadius S. (eds.) (2005) Low Tech Innovation in the Knowledge Economy. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
  50. Hirsch-Kreinsen H., Jacobson D., Laestadius S., Smith K. (2005) Low and Medium Technology Industries in the Knowledge Economies: The Analytical Issues // Low Tech Innovation in the Knowledge Economy / Eds. H. Hirsch-Kreinsen, D. Jacobson, S. Laestadius). Frankfurt: Peter Lang. P. 11-29.
  51. Hirsch-Kreinsen H., Schwinge I. (eds.) (2014) Knowledge-intensive Entrepreneurship in Low-Tech Industries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  52. Hollanders H., Tarantola S. (2011) Innovation Union Scoreboard 2010 - Methodology report. Maastricht, Brussels: UNU-MERIT, European Commission.
  53. Jensen M.B., Johnson B., Lorenz E., Lundvall B-Å. (2007) Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation // Research Policy. Vol. 36. № 5. P. 680-693.
  54. Kaloudis A., Sandven T., Smith K. (2005) Structural change, growth and innovation: The roles of medium and low-tech industries, 1980-2000 // Low Tech Innovation in the Knowledge Economy / Eds. H. Hirsch-Kreinsen, D. Jacobson, S. Laestadius. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. P. 31-63.
  55. Klevorick A.K., Levin R.C., Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. (1995) On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technical opportunities // Research Policy. Vol. 24. № 2. P. 185-205.
  56. Kline S.J., Rosenberg N. (1986) An Overview of Innovation // The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth / Eds. R. Landau, N. Rosenberg. Washington: National Academy Press. P. 275-305.
  57. Laestadious S., Pedersen T.E., Sandven T. (2005) Towards a new understanding of innovativeness - and of innovation based indicators // Low Tech Innovation in the Knowledge Economy / Eds. H. Hirsch-Kreinsen, D. Jacobson, S. Laestadius. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. P. 75-121.
  58. Lazonick W. (2013) The Theory of Innovative Enterprise: Methodology, Ideology, and Institutions // Alternative Theories of Competition: Challenges to the Orthodox / Eds. J.K. Moudud, C. Bina, P.L. Mason. London: Routledge. P. 127-159.
  59. Lundvall B-Å. (ed.) (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
  60. Lundvall B-Å., Borrás S. (1999) The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  61. Malerba F. (2002) Sectoral systems of innovation and production // Research Policy. Vol. 31. № 2. P. 247-264.
  62. Martin B. (2012) The evolution of science policy and innovation studies // Research Policy. Vol. 41. № 7. P. 1219-1239.
  63. Mendonça S. (2009) Brave old world: Accounting for ‘high-tech' knowledge in ‘low-tech' industries // Research Policy. Vol. 38. № 3. P. 470-482.
  64. Metcalfe S. (1998) Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction. London: Routledge.
  65. Mowery D.C. (2009) Plus ça change: Industrial R&D in the "third industrial revolution" // Industrial and Corporate Change. Vol. 18. № 1. P. 1-50.
  66. Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R. (eds.) (1999) Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  67. Nelson R.R. (1995) Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change // Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 33. № 1. P. 48-90.
  68. Nelson R.R. (ed.) (1993) National Innovation Systems: A comparative study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  69. OECD (1992) TEP: The Key Relationships. Paris: OECD.
  70. OECD (1998) New Rationale and Approaches in Technology and Innovation Policy (STI Review. № 22). Paris: OECD.
  71. OECD (2001) Innovative Networks: Co-operation in national innovation systems. Paris: OECD.
  72. OECD (2002) Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development (6th edition). Paris: OECD.
  73. OECD (2005) Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (3rd edition). Paris: OECD.
  74. Pavitt K. (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and theory // Research Policy. Vol. 13. № 6. P. 343-373.
  75. Pavitt K. (1999) Technology, Management and Systems of Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  76. Peneder M. (1999) The Austrian Paradox: "Old" structures but high performance? // Austrian Economic Quarterly. Vol. 4. № 4. P. 239-247.
  77. Peneder M. (2010) Technological regimes and the variety of innovation behaviour: Creating integrated taxonomies of firms and sectors // Research Policy. Vol. 39. № 3. P. 323-334.
  78. Perez C. (2010) Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms // Cambridge Journal of Economics. Vol. 34. № 1. P. 185-202.
  79. Robertson P., Smith K. (2008) Distributed knowledge bases in low- and medium technology industries // Innovation in Low-Tech Firms and Industries / Eds. H. Hirsch-Kreinsen, D. Jacobson. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. P. 93-117.
  80. Robertson P., Smith K., von Tunzelmann N. (2009) Innovation in low- and medium-technology industries // Research Policy. Vol. 38. № 3. P. 441-446.
  81. Rosenberg N. (1982) Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  82. Rosenberg N., Landau R. (eds.) (1986) The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
  83. Rosenberg N., Mowery D.C. (1998) Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  84. Smith K. (2000) Innovation as a Systemic Phenomenon: Rethinking the Role of Policy // Enterprise & Innovation Management Studies. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 73-102.
  85. Smith K. (2002) What is the “Knowledge Economy”? Knowledge intensity and distributed knowledge bases (UNU/INTECH Discussion Paper Series, 2002-6). Maastricht: United Nations University.
  86. Smith K. (2005) Measuring Innovation // The Oxford Handbook of Innovation / Eds. J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 148-177.
  87. Tidd J., Bessant J., Pavitt K. (1997) Managing Innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  88. UNDP (2001) Human Development Report: Making new technologies work for human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  89. von Hippel E. (1988) The Sources of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  90. von Tunzelmann N. (1995) Technology and Industrial Progress: The foundations of economic growth. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
  91. von Tunzelmann N., Acha V. (2005) Innovation in "Low-Tech" Industries // The Oxford Handbook of Innovation / Eds. J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 407-432.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».