电邮这篇文章 Comparison of the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided and ultrasound-guided subgluteal nerve blocks with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation: A randomized controlled feasibility trial
- 作者: Piacherski V.G.1, Muzyka L.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- Mogilev Regional Clinical Hospital
- 期: 卷 16, 编号 1 (2022)
- 页面: 71-77
- 栏目: Original articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/1993-6508/article/view/104337
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/1993-6508-2022-16-1-71-77
- ID: 104337
如何引用文章
开放存取
##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
订阅存取
详细
AIM: The efficacy of sciatic nerve blockade with subchondral access under ultrasound guidance (USG) versus ultrasound guidance in combination with EPN (USEPN) is unknown. Data on studies of these techniques for blockade of other peripheral nerves are inconsistent. This study evaluated the feasibility of a randomized trial to compare the efficacy of sciatic nerve blockade with USG-guided sciatic access with the current practice of USEPN.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients were randomized into two groups in which USG or USEPN guidance was used to perform sciatic nerve blockade with sciatic access. The primary endpoint was the quality of the sensory block. The secondary endpoint was the quality of the motor block.
RESULTS: Two groups of 20 patients each were analyzed. All patients developed successful motor and sensory blocks of the sciatic nerve when using USG and USEPN. All cases were followed. Three patients were excluded before randomization because of the unsatisfactory ultrasound imaging of the sciatic nerve.
CONCLUSION: The results show that a prospective study of alternative techniques of sciatic nerve block by subchondral access is possible. In our pilot study, sciatic nerve block performed under USG guidance without EPN was effective in all cases.
作者简介
Valery Piacherski
Mogilev Regional Clinical Hospital
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: pechersky.v@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6237-8063
anesthesiologist-resuscitator
白俄罗斯, 12, B.-Biruli str., Mogilev, 212026Lidiya Muzyka
Mogilev Regional Clinical Hospital
Email: lida.muzyka@yandex.by
anesthesiologist-resuscitator
白俄罗斯, 12, B.-Biruli str., Mogilev, 212026参考
- Munirama S, McLeod G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of ultrasound versus electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve location and blockade. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(9):1084–1091. doi: 10.1111/anae.13098
- Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, Horn JL. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(3):408–417. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen384
- Piacherski V, Marochkov A, Brukhnou A, Kokhan Z. Comparison of Three Methods of Regional Anesthesia of Peripheral Nerves and Plexuses. Open Journal of Anesthesiology. 2012;02(05):237–243. doi: 10.4236/ojanes.2012.25056
- Kokhan Z, Brukhnou A, Marochkov AV. Piacherski Pressure of local anesthetic solution while performing sciatic nerve blockade in human subgluteal area. Open Journal of Anesthesiology. 2014;11:276–280.
- Varobieff M, Choquet O, Swisser F, et al. Real-Time Injection Pressure Sensing and Minimal Intensity Stimulation Combination During Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks: An Exploratory Observational Trial. Anesth Analg. 2021;132(2):556–565. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005308
- Chan VW, Perlas A, McCartney CJ, et al. Ultrasound guidance improves success rate of axillary brachial plexus block. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54(3):176–182. doi: 10.1007/BF03022637
- Dufour E, Quennesson P, Van Robais AL, et al. Combined ultrasound and neurostimulation guidance for popliteal sciatic nerve block: a prospective, randomized comparison with neurostimulation alone. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(5):1553–1558, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181684b42
- Domingo-Triado V, Selfa S, Martinez F, et al. Ultrasound guidance for lateral midfemoral sciatic nerve block: a prospective, comparative, randomized study. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(5):1270–1274, tables of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000221469.24319.49
- Perlas A, Brull R, Chan VW, et al. Ultrasound guidance improves the success of sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33(3):259–265. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.10.010
- Azmin FMT, Choy YC. Regional infraclavicular blocks via the coracoid approach for below-elbow surgery: a comparison between ultrasound guidance with, or without, nerve stimulation. Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 2014;19(5):263–269. doi: 10.1080/22201173.2013.10872937
- Robards CB, Porter SB, Logvinov I, Clendenen SR. Success of ultrasound guided popliteal sciatic nerve catheters is not influenced by nerve stimulation. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2013;22(2):179–183.
- Sala-Blanch X, de Riva N, Carrera A, et al. Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic block with a single injection at the sciatic division results in faster block onset than the classical nerve stimulator technique. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(5):1121–1127. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318248e1b3
- van Geffen GJ, van den Broek E, Braak GJ, et al. A prospective randomised controlled trial of ultrasound guided versus nerve stimulation guided distal sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37(1):32–37. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0903700115
