Эпидуральная анальгезия: больше не золотой стандарт послеоперационного обезболивания?


Цитировать

Полный текст

Аннотация

Об авторах

Нариндер Раваль

Университетская больница, Оребро, Швеция

Профессор; Отделение анестезиологии и интенсивной терапии

Список литературы

  1. Beattie W.S., Badner N.H., Choi P. Epidural analgesia reduces postoperative myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis // Anesth. Analg. 2001; 93: 853-858.
  2. Ballantyne J.C., Can D.B., de Ferranti S. et al. The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials // Analg. Anesth. 1998; 86: 598-612.
  3. Lorgensen H., Wetterslev J., Moiniche S. et al. Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000: CD001893.
  4. Rodgers A., Walker N., Schug S. et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomized trials // BMJ. 2000; 321: 1493.
  5. Kehlet H., Dahl X. Epidural analgesia and postoperative outcomes - a need for a different approach // Acta. Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2008; 52: 1311-1312.
  6. Rigg J.R., Jamrozik K., Myles P.S. et al. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomized trial // Lancet. 2002; 359: 1276-1282.
  7. Park W.Y., Thompson J.S., Lee K.K. Effect of epidural anaesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: a randomized, controlled Veterans Affairs cooperative study // Ann. Surg. 2001; 234: 560-569.
  8. Liu S.S., Block B. M., Wu C.L. Effects of perioperative central neuraxial analgesia on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis // Anesthesiology. 2004; 101: 153-161.
  9. Kettner S.C., Willschke H., Marhofer P. Does regional anaesthesia really improve outcome? // Br. J. Anaesth. 2011; 107: i90-i95.
  10. Hanna M.N., Murphy J.D., Kumar K., Wu C.L. Regional techniques and outcome. What is the evidence? // Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2009; 22: 672-677.
  11. Liu S.S., Wu C.L. Effect of postoperative analgesia on major postoperative complications: a systematic update of the evidence // Anesth. Analg. 2007; 104: 689-702.
  12. Svircevic V. van Dijk D., Nierieh A.P. et al. Meta-analysis of thoracic epidural anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia of cardiac surgery // Anesthesiology. 2011; 114: 271-282.
  13. Wu C.L., Cohen S.R., Richman J.M. et al. Efficacy of postoperative patient-controlled and continuous infusion epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled analgesia with opioids. A meta-analysis // Anesthesiology. 2005; 103: 10791088.
  14. Popping D.M., Elia N., Marret E. et al. Protective effects of epidural analgesia on pulmonary complications after abdominal and thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis // Arch. Surg. 2008; 143: 990-999.
  15. Holte K., Kehlet H. Postoperative ileus. A preventable event // Br. J. Surg. 2000; 87: 1480-1493.
  16. Marret E., Remy C., Bonnet F. Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia versus parenteral opioid analgesia after colorectal surgery // Br. J. Surg. 2007; 94: 665-673.
  17. McCarthy G.C., Megalla S.A., Habib A.S. Impact of intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative analgesia and recovery from surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials // Drugs. 2010; 70: 1149-1163.
  18. Marret E., Rolin M., Beaussier M., Bonnet F. Metaanalysis of intravenous lidocaine and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery // Br. J. Surg. 2008; 95: 1331-1338.
  19. Vigneault L., Turgeon A.F., Cote D. et al. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain control: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials // Can. J. Anaesth. 2011; 58: 22-37.
  20. Fitzgerald J.E.F., Ahmed I. Systematic review and metaanalysis of chewing-gum therapy in the reduction of postoperative ileus following gastrointestinal surgery // World J. Surg. 2009; 33: 2557-2566.
  21. Low J., Johnston N., Morris C. Epidural analgesia: first do no harm [editorial] // Anaesthesia. 2008; 63: 1-3.
  22. Nishimori M., Ballantyne J.C., Low J.H.S. Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006: CD005059.
  23. Werawatganon T., Charuluxanun S. Patient controlled intravenous opioid analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain after intra-abdominal surgery // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2O05: CD0O4O88.
  24. Choi P.T., Bhandari M., Scott J., Douketis J. Epidural analgesia for pain relief following hip or knee replacement // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003: CD00307L
  25. Banz V. M., Jacob S. M., Inderbitzin D. Improving outcome after major surgery: pathophysiological considerations // Anesth. Analg. 2011; 112: 1147-1155.
  26. Liu S.S., Wu C.L. The effect of analgesic technique on postoperative patient-reported outcomes including analgesia: a systematic review // Anesth. Analg. 2007; 105: 789-808.
  27. Kehlet H., Dahl J.B. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet. 2003; 362: 1921-1928.
  28. Kehlet H., Wilmore D.W. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery // Ann Surg. 2008; 248: 189-198.
  29. Gatt M., Anderson A.D.G., Reddy B.S. et al. Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection // Br. J. Surg. 2005; 92: 1354-1362.
  30. Carli F., Kehlet H., Baldini G. et al. Evidence basis for regional anaesthesia in multidisciplinary fast-track surgical care pathways // Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2011; 36: 63-72.
  31. Levy B.F., Tilney H.S., Dowson H.M.P., Rockall Т.А. A systematic review of postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic colorectal surgery // Colorectal Disease. 2010; 12: 5-15.
  32. Kehlet H., Wilmore D.W. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome // Am. J. Surg. 2002; 183: 630-641.
  33. Schlachta C.M., Burpee S.E., Fernandez C. et al. Optimizing recovery after laparoscopic colon surgery (ORAL-CS). Effect of intravenous ketorolac on length of hospital stay // Surg. Endosc. 2007; 21: 2212-2219.
  34. Delaney C.P., Zutshi M., Senagore A.J. et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection // Dis. Colon. Rectum. 2003; 46: 851-859.
  35. Maessen J., Dejong C.H.C., Hausel J. et al. A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection // Br. J. Surg. 2007; 94: 224-231.
  36. Wind J., Polle S.W., Fung Ron Jin P.H.P. et al. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery // Br. J. Surg. 2006; 93: 800-809.
  37. Varadhan K.K., Neal K.R., Dejong C.H.C., Fearon С.Н., Ljungqvist O., Lobo D.N. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials // Clin. Nutr. 2010; 29: 434-40.
  38. Vlug M.S., Wind J., Hollman M.W. et al. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery. A randomized clinical trial (LAFA study) // Ann Surg. 2011; 254: 868-875.
  39. Banz V.M., Inderbitzin D., Jacob S. M. Improving surgical outcome: combine evidence from unimodal interventions [letter response] // Anesth. Analg. 2012; 114: 241-242.
  40. Spanjersberg W.R., Reurings J., Keus F., van Laarhoven C.J. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; 2: CD007635.
  41. Gendall K.A., Kennedy R.R., Watson A.J.M., Frizelle F.A. The effect of epidural analgesia on postoperative outcome after colorectal surgery // Colorectal Disease. 2007; 9: 584600.
  42. Bonnet F., Camu F. PROSPECT Working Group. Procedure-specific recommendations for pain management after colon resection (2009 update). Available at: www.postoppain.org. Accessed February 26, 2012.
  43. Moen V., Dahlgren N., Irestedt L. Severe neurological complications after central neuraxial blockades in Sweden 1990-1999 // Anesthesiology. 2004; 101: 950-959.
  44. Cook T. M., Counsell D., Wildsmith J.A.W. Major complications of central neuraxial blocks: report on the third national audit project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists // Br. J. Anaesth. 2009; 102: 179-190.
  45. Grounds R.M. Is the outcome for central neuraxial blockade really reassuring? [letter] // Br. J. Anaesth. 2009; 102: 714715.
  46. Power G.E., Warden B., Cooke K. Changing patterns in acute pain service: epidural versus patient-controlled analgesia // Anaesth. Intensive Care. 2005; 33: 501-505.
  47. Benzon H.T., Jabri R.S. Neuraxial anaesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks in patients on anticoagulants in the presence of epidural catheter. In: Hadzic A., ed. Textbook of Regional Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Management. New York: McGraw Hill Companies; 2007: 997-1012.
  48. Bedforth N.M., Hardman J.G. The hidden cost of neuraxial anaesthesia? [editorial] // Anaesthesia. 2010; 65: 435-436.
  49. Chilvers C.R., Nguyen M.H., Robertson I.K. Changing from epidural to multimodal analgesia for colorectal laparotomy: an audit // Anaesth. Intensive Care. 2007; 35: 230-238.
  50. Ready L.B. Acute pain: lessons learned from 25,000 patients. // Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 1999; 24: 499-505.
  51. Kehlet H., Gray A.W., Bonnet F. et al. A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy // Surg. Endosc. 2005; 19: 396-415.
  52. Davies R.G., Myles P.S., Graham J. M. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy - a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized trials // Br. J. Anaesth. 2006; 96: 418-426.
  53. Joshi G.P., Bonnet F., Shah R. et al. A systematic review of randomized trials evaluating regional techniques for postthoracotomy analgesia // Anesth. Analg. 2008; 107: 10261040.
  54. Fischer H.B.J., Simanski C.J.P. PROSPECT Working Group. A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for analgesia after hip replacement // Anaesthesia. 2005; 60: 1189-1202.
  55. Fowler S.J., Symons J., Sabato S., Myles P.S. Epidural analgesia compared with peripheral nerve blockade after major knee surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials // Br. J. Anaesth. 2008; 100: 154-164.
  56. Fischer H.B.J., Simanski C.J.P., Sharp C. et al. A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty // Anaesthesia. 2008; 63: 1105-1123.
  57. Liu S.S., Richman J.M., Thirlby R.C., Wu C.L. Efficacy of continuous wound catheters delivering local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials // J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2006; 203: 914-932.
  58. Petersen P.L., Mathiesen I., Torup H., Dahl J.B. The transversus abdominis plane block: a valuable option for postoperative analgesia. A topical review // Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2010; 54: 529-535.
  59. Richman J.M., Liu S.S., Courpas G. et al. Does continuous peripheral nerve block provide superior pain control to opioids? A meta-analysis // Anesth. Analg. 2006; 102: 248-257.
  60. Mcintyre P.E., Schug S.A., Scott D.A. et al. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. 2010 Acute Pain Management: Scientific Evidence. 3-rd ed. Melbourne, Australia: Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists; 2010. Available at: http://www.anzca.edu.au.
  61. Paul J.E., Arya A., Hulburt L. et al. Femoral nerve block improves analgesia outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials // Anesthesiology. 2010; 115: 1144-1162.
  62. Rawal N., Axelsson K., Hylander J. et al. Postoperative patient-controlled local anesthetic administration at home // Anesth. Analg. 1998; 86: 86-89.
  63. Gupta A., Favaios S., Perniola A., Magnuson A., Berggren L. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of wound catheters for postoperative pain management // Acta. Anaestesiol. Scand. 2011; 55: 785-796.
  64. Moiniche S., Dahl J.B. Wound catheters for post-operative pain: overture or finale? [editorial] // Acta. Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2011; 55: 775-777.
  65. Rawal N., Borgeat A., Scott N. Wound catheters for postoperative pain management: overture or finale? [letter] // Acta. Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2012; 56: 395-396.
  66. Beaussier M., White P., Raeder J. Is a negative meta-analyses consisting of heterogenic studies on wound catheters sufficient to conclude that no additional studies are needed? [letter] // Acta. Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2012; 56: 396-397.
  67. Rawal N. Perineural catheter analgesia as a routine method after ambulatory surgery - effective but unrealistic // Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2012; 37: 72-78.
  68. Beaussier M., El Ayoubi H., Schiffer E. et al. Continuous preperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine provides effective analgesia and accelerates recovery after colorectal surgery. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study // Anesthesiology. 2007; 107: 461-418.
  69. Ranta P.O., Ala-Kokko T.I., Kukkonen J.E. et al. Incisional and epidural analgesia after caesarean delivery: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical study. Int. J. Obstet Anesth. 2006; 15: 189-194.
  70. O’Neill P., Duarte F., Ribeiro I. et al. Ropivacaine continuous wound infusion versus epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia after caesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial // Anesth. Analg. 2012; 114: 179-185.
  71. Bamigboye A.A., Hofrneyr G.J. Local anaesthetic wound infiltration and abdominal nerves block during caesarean section for postoperative pain relief. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009: CD006954.
  72. Procedure-Specific Postoperative Pain Management (PROSPECT). Available at: www.postoppain.org. Accessed February 26, 2012.
  73. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting. An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management // Anesthesiology. 2012; 116: 248-273.
  74. Kerr D.R., Kohan L. Local infiltration analgesia: a technique for control of acute postoperative pain following knee and hip surgery: a case study of 325 patients // Acta Orthop. 2008; 79: 174-183.
  75. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2010. Available at: http://www.knee.nko.se/english. Accessed December 5, 2011.
  76. Andersen Ê.Ó. Pfeiffer-Jensen M., Haraldsted V., Soballe K. Reduced hospital stay and narcotic consumption, and improved mobilization with local and intraarticular infiltration after hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial of an intraarticular technique versus epidural infusion in 80 patients // Acta Orthop. 2007; 78: 180-186.
  77. Essving P., Axelsson K., Kjellberg J. et al. Reduced hospital stay, morphine consumption, and pain intensity with local infiltration analgesia after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A randomized double-blind study of 40 patients // Acta Orthop. 2009; 80: 213-219.
  78. Andersen L.J., Poulsen T., Krogh B., Nielsen T. Postoperative analgesia in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized doubleblinded, placebo-controlled study on preoperative and postoperative ropivacaine, ketorolac, and adrenaline wound infiltration // Acta Orthop. 2007; 78: 187-192.
  79. Toftdahl K., Nikolajsen L., Haraldsted V. et al. Comparison of peri- and intraarticular analgesia with femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial // Acta Orthop. 2007; 78: 172-179.
  80. Spreng U.J., Dahl V., Hjall A. et al. High volume local infiltration analgesia combined with intravenous or local ketolorac + morphine compared with epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty // Br. J. Anaesth. 2010; 105: 675-682.
  81. Essving P., Axelsson K., Aberg E., Spannar H., Gupta A., Lundin A. Local infiltration analgesia versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial // Anesth. Analg. 2011; 113: 926-933.
  82. Kehlet H., Andersen L.O. Local infiltration analgesia in joint replacement: the evidence and recommendations for clinical practice // Acta. Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2011; 778-784.
  83. Raeder J., Spreng U.J. Local-infiltration anaesthesia (LIA): post-operative pain management revisited and appraised by the surgeons? // Acta. Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011; 55: 772-774.
  84. Rostlund T., Kehlet H. High-dose local infiltration analgesia after hip and knee replacement - what is it, why does it work, and what are the future challenges? [editorial] // Acta Orthop. 2007; 78: 159-161.
  85. Rawal N. Local infiltration analgesia and other multicomponent techniques to improve postoperative outcome -are we comparing oranges and apples? // Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2011; 36: 417-420.
  86. Biki B., Mascha E., Moriarty D.C., et al. Anesthetic technique for radical prostatectomy surgery affects cancer recurrence. A retrospective analysis // Anesthesiology. 2008; 109: 180-187.
  87. Christopherson R., James K.E., Tableman M. et al. Longterm survival after colon cancer surgery: a variation associated with choice of anaesthesia // Anesth. Analg. 2008; 107: 325-332.
  88. Yeager M.P., Rosekranz K.M. Cancer recurrence after surgery. A role for regional anaesthesia? [editorial] // Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2010; 35: 483-488.
  89. Chang C.C., Lin H.C., Lin H.W., Lin H.C. Anesthetic management and surgical site infections in total hip and knee replacement. A population-based study // Anesthesiology. 2010; 113: 279-285.
  90. Tsui B.C.H., Green J.S. Type of anaesthesia during cancer surgery and cancer recurrence // BMJ. 2011; 342: dl605.

Дополнительные файлы

Доп. файлы
Действие
1. JATS XML
Скачать

© ООО "Эко-Вектор", 2012


 


Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».