Clinical Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy of Intrathecal Morphine in Thoracic Surgery
- Authors: Zhikharev V.A.1,2, Bushuev A.S.1, Zimina L.A.1, Arutyunyan R.A.1, Koriachkin V.A.3
-
Affiliations:
- Scientific Research Institution — Ochapovsky Regional Clinic Hospital
- Kuban State Medical University
- Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
- Issue: Vol 19, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 244-252
- Section: Original articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/1993-6508/article/view/350832
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RA680797
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OYNNPU
- ID: 350832
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In thoracic surgery, pain intensity resulting from nociceptive stimulation due to skin incision, muscle trauma, rib retraction, and pleural dissection contributes to central sensitization and the development of severe postoperative pain, particularly in the early postoperative period. Intrathecal administration of morphine represents an alternative opioid-sparing component of multimodal acute pain management.
AIM: The work aimed to clinically evaluate the analgesic efficacy of intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
METHODS: The study included 255 patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy. Patients were allocated into three groups: group 1 (n = 85) received intrathecal morphine; group 2 (n = 85) received systemic opioid analgesics; and group 3 (n = 85) received intercostal nerve blockade with ropivacaine. Pain intensity was assessed 2 and 24 hours postoperatively, along with the need for rescue analgesia (trimeperidine or tramadol) and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention requiring bladder catheterization, and delayed respiratory depression.
RESULTS: Two hours after surgery, pain intensity was lowest in the intercostal nerve block group (4 [3–4] cm on the visual analog scale [VAS]) and slightly higher in the intrathecal morphine group (4 [4–5] cm on the VAS). Both groups demonstrated a significantly greater analgesic effect compared with the systemic opioid analgesia group (6 [5–6] cm on the VAS; p < 0.001). At 24 hours postoperatively, pain intensity in group 1 decreased to 3 [2–3] cm on the VAS, whereas in group 2 it increased to 6 [5–6] cm, comparable with group 3 (6 [5–6] cm; p < 0.001). Trimeperidine consumption was significantly lower in group 1 (p < 0.001). The frequency of tramadol administration was also reduced (p < 0.001). The highest incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was observed in group 2 (p < 0.001). The incidence of pruritus and urinary retention did not differ significantly among groups. No cases of delayed respiratory depression were reported.
CONCLUSION: Intrathecal administration of morphine significantly reduced pain intensity, decreased the need for opioid analgesics, and was associated with a low incidence of pruritus within the first 24 hours after surgery. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was lower compared with both systemic opioid analgesia and intercostal nerve block. The need for urinary catheterization did not differ among groups. No delayed respiratory depression was observed.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Vasiliy A. Zhikharev
Scientific Research Institution — Ochapovsky Regional Clinic Hospital; Kuban State Medical University
Email: Vasilii290873@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5147-5637
SPIN-code: 7406-7687
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Krasnodar; KrasnodarAlexandr S. Bushuev
Scientific Research Institution — Ochapovsky Regional Clinic Hospital
Email: ksmukubris@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1427-4032
SPIN-code: 3640-7080
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, KrasnodarLyudmila A. Zimina
Scientific Research Institution — Ochapovsky Regional Clinic Hospital
Email: bolotina.lyuda@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-1819-5913
SPIN-code: 6143-2170
MD
Russian Federation, KrasnodarRobert A. Arutyunyan
Scientific Research Institution — Ochapovsky Regional Clinic Hospital
Email: robert.arutyunyan1212@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-8369-8171
SPIN-code: 6397-0207
MD
Russian Federation, KrasnodarVictor A. Koriachkin
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: vakoryachkin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3400-8989
SPIN-code: 6101-0578
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Dinges HC, Otto S, Stay DK, et al. Side Effect Rates of Opioids in Equianalgesic Doses via Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(4):1153–1162. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003887
- Lavand’homme P, Steyaert A. Opioid-free anesthesia opioid side effects: tolerance and hyperalgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017;(31):487–498. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2017.05.003
- Bazarov DV, Toneev EA, Vyzhigina MA, et al. Multidisciplinary approach in management of postoperative pain in modern thoracic surgery. Russian Journal of Pain. 2019;17(2):14–19. doi: 10.25731/RASP.2019.02.15 EDN: CILGBD
- Yaksi O, Ozel A, Yaksi E, Kilicgun A. Postoperative complications and its relationship with the severity of postoperative pain in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Experimental Biomedical Research. 2021;4(2):107–112. doi: 10.30714/j-ebr.2021267973 EDN: EUVFWI
- Joshi GP. Rational Multimodal Analgesia for Perioperative Pain Management. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023;27(8):227–237. doi: 10.1007/s11916-023-01137-y EDN: RHEHSM
- Ovechkin AM, Yavorovskii AG. Non-opioid analgesia in surgery: from theory to practice. A guide for physicians. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2024. EDN: GCVKLO
- Kurzova A, Malek J, Klezl P, Hess L, Sliva JA. Single Dose of Intrathecal Morphine Without Local Anesthetic Provides Long-Lasting Postoperative Analgesia After Radical Prostatectomy and Nephrectomy. J Perianesth Nurs. 2024;39(4):577–582. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2023.10.019 EDN: OGAXYS
- Ashoor TM, Esmat IM, Algendy MA, et al. Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. J Anesth. 2025;39(2):299–310. doi: 10.1007/s00540-025-03466
- .Pierson D, Certoma R, Hobbs J, Cong X, Li J. A Narrative Review on Multimodal Spinal Anesthesia: Old Technique and New Use. J Anesth Transl Med. 2025;4(1):25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jatmed.2025.02.002
- Huang YX, Chen Y, Wang W, et al. Intrathecal hydromorphone vs. transversus abdominis plane block for upper abdominal surgery: a propensity score-matching study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025;25(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03107-w
- Kaye AD, Lindberg AM, Shah SS, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Intrathecal Morphine for Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024;28(10):1007–1013. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01292-w EDN: ZSZTDZ
- Xue FS, He N, Cheng Y. Comparing analgesic efficacy of different-dose intrathecal morphine after cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2024;43(4):101400. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101400 EDN: NESJSP
- Sharpe EE, Molitor RJ, Arendt KW, Torbenson VE, et al. Intrathecal Morphine versus Intrathecal Hydromorphone for Analgesia after Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology. 2020;132(6):1382–1391. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003283 EDN: AWMPBE
- Potаpov AL, Zemskovа DV, Kostyuk IP. Spinal anesthesia as a part of anaesthesiologic support in fast track laparoscopic colon surgeries. Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation. 2018;15(2):21–24. doi: 10.21292/2078-5658-2018-15-2-21-24 EDN: UOFYQU
- Sokolov SV, Glushchenko VA, Mikhnin AE. Frequency of typical complications of morphine during its intrathecal and epidural introduction in knee arthroplasty. Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation. 2023;20(1):36–40. doi: 10.24884/2078-5658-2023-20-1-36-40 EDN: SJNCKF
- Shifman EM, Filippovich GV. Selected chapters from monograph “Spinal anesthesia in obstetrics” respiratory disorders during spinal anesthesia. Regional anesthesia and acute pain management. 2013;7(4):44–53. EDN: RRSEZX
- Rawal N. Intrathecal opioids for the management of post-operative pain. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2023;37(2):123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2023.01.001 EDN: AJWUPD
- Pirie KP, Wang A, Yu J, et al. Postoperative analgesia for upper gastrointestinal surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis. Perioper Med (Lond). 2023;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00324-0 EDN: BRFNAE
- Osipenko DV, Silanau AA, Marochkov AV, Rimashevsky VV. Comparative evaluation of intrathecal morphine on postoperative course in patients undergone cardiac surgery. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2025;19(1):49–58. doi: 10.17816/RA642386 EDN: NSWLUE
- Ezhevskaya AA. Regional anesthesia in spine and spinal cord surgery. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2016;10(1):19–29. doi: 10.18821/1993-6508-2016-10-1-19-29 EDN: VOHBKB
- Timerbaev VH, Genov PG, Smirnova OV. Intrathecal opioid analgesia — state in the world and in the Russian Federation. Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya . 2015;60(3):70–75.
- Cummings A, Orgill BD, Fitzgerald BM. Intrathecal Morphine. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
- Hermanns H, Bos EME, van Zuylen ML, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF. The options for neuraxial drug administration. Review article. CNS Drugs. 2022;36(8):877–896. doi: 10.1007/s40263-022-00936-y
- DeSousa KA, Chandran R. Intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia: Current trends. World J Anesthesiol. 2014;3(3):191–202. doi: 10.5313/wja.v3.i3.191
- Gehling M, Tryba M. Risks and side effects of intrathecal morphine combined with spinal anaesthesia: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:643–651. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05817.x
- González-Santos S, Mugabure B, Granell M, et al. Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Intrathecal Morphine or Intercostal Levobupivacaine in Lung Cancer Patients after Major Lung Resection Surgery by Videothoracoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2024;13(7):1972. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071972 EDN: MUNAPP
- Sokolov SV, Zabolotskii DV, Koryachkin VA. Prevention of postoperative delirium in patients of elderly and senile age in orthopedic practice. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2018;12(1):41–46. doi: 10.18821/1993-6508-2018-12-1-41-46 EDN: YVOZGY
- Sommer B, Karageorgos N, AlSharif M, Stubbe H, Hans FJ. Long-term Outcome and Adverse Events of Intrathecal Opioid Therapy for Nonmalignant Pain Syndrome. Pain Pract. 2020;20(1):8–15. doi: 10.1111/papr.12818
- Dhawan R, Daubenspeck D, Wroblewski KE, et al. Intrathecal morphine for analgesia in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial. Anesthesiology. 2021;135(5):864–876 doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003963 EDN: GONBVY
- El-Boghdadly K, Renard Y, Rossel JB, et al. Pulmonary complications after intrathecal morphine administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2025;80(8):959–972. doi: 10.1111/anae.16606
- Renard Y, El-Boghdadly K, Rossel JB, et al. Non-pulmonary complications of intrathecal morphine administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression. Br J Anaesth. 2024;133(4):823–838. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.05.045
- Frauenknecht J, Kirkham KR, Jacot-Guillarmod A, Albrecht E. Analgesic impact of intra-operative opioids vs. opioid-free anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2019;74(5):651–662. doi: 10.1111/anae.14582
Supplementary files




