Recurrent of ovarian cancer with lymph node involvement: surgery or chemotherapy? Retrospective cohort study
- 作者: Stilidi I.S.1,2,3, Egenov O.A.1, Nered S.N.1,3, Kalinin O.E.1, Shevchuk A.S.1, Arkhiri P.P.1,3, Suleymanov E.A.4, Tyulyandina А.S.1,5
-
隶属关系:
- Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
- Ministry of Health of the Chechen Republic
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
- 期: 卷 24, 编号 2 (2022)
- 页面: 170-176
- 栏目: CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/1815-1434/article/view/109340
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/18151434.2022.2.201692
- ID: 109340
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
Aim. To give a comparative analysis of long-term results of treatment of patients after surgical treatment in combination with systemic chemotherapy with a control group of patients who received only second-line chemotherapy without surgical treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) with lymph node (LN) involvement, as well as the search of prognostic factors that favorably affect progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Materials and methods. The retrospective analysis included patients under the age of 75 after surgical treatment or after only second-line chemotherapy without surgery for isolated recurrence in the LN or a combined form of recurrence of OC at Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology from 2005 to 2020. All patients had previously received combined treatment for primary OC. Exclusion criteria: absence of LN involvement in the recurrence of OC, primary multiple malignant tumors, relapses of non-epithelial ovarian tumors, the presence of concomitant pathology in the decompensation phase and lack of information about the treatment received for the recurrence of OC and the date of subsequent progression, death or last observation. The primary endpoint of the study is PFS and the secondary endpoint is OS.
Results. The final analysis included 214 patients, who were subsequently divided into 2 main groups: the study group consisted of patients (n=123; 57.5%) who underwent repeated cytoreduction + systemic chemotherapy, and the control group included patients (n=91; 42.5%) who received only second-line chemotherapy. In the general population of patients, the median platinum-free interval was 14.0 months. Platinum-sensitive recurrence of OC developed in 88.3% (189/214) of patients, and platinum-resistant recurrence was observed in 11.7% (25/214) of cases. In the study group, complete repeated cytoreduction was achieved in 70.7% (87/123) of patients, and incomplete – in 29.3% (36/123) of patients. All 91 patients in the control group received second-line chemotherapy in the planned volume. The vast majority of patients underwent second-line platinum-containing chemotherapy – 87.9% (188/214) of patients. The median follow-up was 33.0 (range 0.7–174.0) months. Long-term results in the complete cytoreduction group were significantly higher – median PFS and OS were 30.0 months and 87.0 months, respectively, however, in the incomplete cytoreduction group, long-term results were statistically significantly worse: median PFS and OS were 10.0 months and 29.0 months versus 12.0 months and 36.0 months, respectively, in the control group of patients. Surgical treatment in combination with chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrence of OC did not improve long-term results of treatment: the median PFS was the same in both groups – 7.0 months, and the median OS was 24.0 months versus 21.0 months in the control group (p=0.372).
Conclusion. Only complete repeated cytoreduction in combination with systemic chemotherapy leads to an improvement in long-term results of treatment compared with incomplete cytoreduction and only second-line systemic chemotherapy. Incomplete repeated cytoreduction, despite combination with systemic chemotherapy, worsens the prognosis and does not improve the results of drug therapy alone in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrence of OC. Combined treatment (surgery + chemotherapy) for platinum-resistant recurrence of OC does not improve long-term results of treatment.
作者简介
Ivan Stilidi
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Email: egenov.omar@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0493-1166
SPIN 代码: 9622-7106
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Acad. RAS
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow; Moscow; MoscowOmar Egenov
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: egenov.omar@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8681-7905
SPIN 代码: 4178-5398
Graduate Student
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowSergey Nered
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Email: egenov.omar@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5403-2396
SPIN 代码: 4588-3230
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow; MoscowOleksiy Kalinin
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Email: egenov.omar@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7457-3889
SPIN 代码: 8638-3526
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowAlexey Shevchuk
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Email: egenov.omar@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9259-4525
SPIN 代码: 9125-1811
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowPeter Arkhiri
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Email: egenov.omar@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6791-2923
SPIN 代码: 6880-4902
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow; MoscowElkhan Suleymanov
Ministry of Health of the Chechen Republic
Email: egenov.omar@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5140-0245
SPIN 代码: 5749-7283
D. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, GroznyАlexandra Tyulyandina
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: egenov.omar@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6104-7473
SPIN 代码: 4848-7126
D. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow; Moscow参考
- Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Петрова Г.В. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2018 г. (заболеваемость и смертность). М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2019 [Kaprin AD, Starinskii VV, Petrova GV. Zlokachestvennye novoobrazovaniia v Rossii v 2018 g. (zabolevaemost' i smertnost'). Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena – filial FGBU “NMITs radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2019 (in Russian)].
- Нечушкина В.М., Морхов К.Ю., Тюляндина А.С., и др. Повторные циторедуктивные вмешательства при раке яичников. Злокачественные опухоли. 2018;3s1:42-6 [Nechushkina VM, Morkhov KIu, Tiuliandina AS, et al. Povtornye tsitoreduktivnye vmeshatel'stva pri rake iaichnikov. Zlokachestvennye opukholi. 2018;3s1:42-6 (in Russian)].
- Егенов О. А., Тюляндина А. С., Неред С.Н., и др. Хирургическое лечение больных с поражением лимфатических узлов при рецидиве рака яичников: непосредственные и отдаленные результаты. Тазовая хирургия и онкология. 2022;12(1):11-26 [Egenov OA, Tjulyandina AS, Nered SN, et al. Surgical treatment of patients with lymph node involvement in recurrent ovarian cancer: immediate and long-term results. Pelvic Surgery and Oncology. 2022;12(1):11-26 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.17650/2686-9594-2022-12-1-11-26
- Егенов О.А., Тюляндина А.С., Стилиди И.С. Хирургическое лечение больных с рецидивами рака яичников: обзор литературы. Современная Онкология. 2021;23(4):638-44 [Egenov OA, Tyulyandina АS, Stilidi IS. Surgical treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer: A review. Journal of Modern Oncology. 2021;23(4):638-44 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.26442/18151434.2021.4.201223
- Егенов О. А., Тюляндина А. С., Сулейманов Э. А., Стилиди И. С. Парааортальная и тазовая лимфодиссекция в комбинированном лечении рецидива рака яичников с изолированным поражением лимфатических узлов: обзор литературы. Тазовая хирургия и онкология. 2022;12(1):58-66 [Egenov OA, Tjulandina AS, Suleymanov EA, Stilidi IS. Paraaortic and pelvic lymph node dissection in the combined treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer with isolated lymph node lesion: a literature review. Pelvic Surgery and Oncology. 2022;12(1):58-66 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.17650/2686-9594-2022-12-1-58-66.
- Мамажонов Х.И., Никогосян С.О., Кузнецов В.В., и др. Комбинированные и расширенные операции при поражении забрюшинных лимфатических узлов у пациенток с рецидивами рака яичников. Тазовая хирургия и онкология. 2020;10(2):11-8 [Mamazhonov KI, Nikogosyan SO, Kuznetsov VV, et al. Combined and expanded operations in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer and affected retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Pelvic Surgery and Oncology. 2020;10(2):11-8 (in Russian)].
- Baek MH, Park EY, Ha HI, et al. Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2022:JCO2102085. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02085
- Coleman RL, Spirtos NM, Enserro D, et al. Secondary Surgical Cytoreduction for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(20):1929-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1902626
- Harter P, Sehouli J, Vergote I, et al. DESKTOP III Investigators. Randomized Trial of Cytoreductive Surgery for Relapsed Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(23):2123-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2103294
- Shi T, Zhu J, Feng Y, et al. Secondary cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (SOC-1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(4):439-49. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00006-1
- Therasse P, Eisenhauer EA, Boqaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228-47.
- Aghajanian C, Goff B, Nycum LR, et al. Final overall survival and safety analysis of OCEANS, a phase 3 trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;139(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.08.004
- Vergote I, Armstrong D, Scambia G, et al. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Farletuzumab in Combination With Carboplatin and Taxane in Patients With Ovarian Cancer in First Platinum-Sensitive Relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(19):2271-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.2596
- Coleman RL, Brady MF, Herzog TJ, et al. Bevacizumab and paclitaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy and secondary cytoreduction in recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study GOG-0213): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(6):779-91. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30279-6
- Morice P, Joulie F, Rey A, et al. Are nodal metastases in ovarian cancer chemoresistant lesions? Analysis of nodal involvement in 105 patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2004;25(2):169-74.
- Gadducci A, Cosio S, Zola P, et al. The clinical outcome of epithelial ovarian cancer patients with apparently isolated lymph node recurrence: a multicenter retrospective Italian study. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116(3):358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.11.008
- Blanchard P, Plantade A, Pagès C, et al. Isolated lymph node relapse of epithelial ovarian carcinoma: outcomes and prognostic factors. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.06.039
- Sehouli J, Stengel D, Oskay G, et al. NOGGO study group. A phase II study of topotecan plus gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(11):1749-55. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf294
- Poveda AM, Selle F, Hilpert F, et al. Bevacizumab Combined With Weekly Paclitaxel, Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, or Topotecan in Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Analysis by Chemotherapy Cohort of the Randomized Phase III AURELIA Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(32):3836-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.1408
补充文件
