Concept of “end of history” and its rethinking: F. Fukuyama’s views evolution
- Authors: Khristenko D.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- Yaroslavl State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 24, No 180 (2019)
- Pages: 186-195
- Section: FOREIGN COUNTRIES’ HISTORY
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/1810-0201/article/view/300501
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2019-24-180-186-195
- ID: 300501
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
We analyze the evolution of the Fukuyama’s views on the development of modern globalized world. The relevance of the topic is due to the fact that this issue is not fully covered in the Russian scientific literature. In particular, little attention is paid to the Western critics of F. Fukuyama, who from the very beginning put forward serious remarks against his concept. We rely on a chronological method, in which the ideological evolution of F. Fukuyama correlates with key events in the history of international relations, for example, September 11, 2001. It is proved, that as a result the American thinker seriously revised his famous concept of “end of history”. Although F. Fukuyama still does not see any serious competition between liberal democracy and rival ideologies, he admits that there are fundamental problems in the system he proposed earlier. F. Fukuyama notes that the main peril for liberal democracy comes from its internal weaknesses, which are related to the biosocial nature of human and the structure of his inner personality. At the same time, F. Fukuyama acknowledges, it is impossible to suspend the development of technologies, specifically biotechnologies, and to predict the results that it can bring to the whole mankind. Because of that, we conclude that the “end of history” is postponed, and liberal democracy is only a short step in the endless spiral of the existence of human society.
References
- Friedman T.L. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century Hardcover. N. Y.: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005.
- Фукуяма Ф. Конец истории? // Вопросы философии. 1990. № 3. С. 134-148.
- Замошкин Ю.А. «Конец истории»: идеологизм и реализм // Вопросы философии. 1990. № 3. С. 148-156.
- Skinner B.F. The Behavior of Organisms. N. Y., 1938. 486 p.
- Гегель Г.В. Философия истории // Гегель Г.В. Сочинения. М., 1935. Т. 8. С. 19.
- Fuller T., Satter D., Stove D., Will F. More Responses to Fukuyama // The National Interest. 1989. № 17. P. 93-100.
- Bloom A., Hassner P., Himmelfarb G., Kristol I., Moynihan D.P., Sestanovich S. Responses to Fukuyama // The National Interest. 1989. № 16. P. 19-35.
- Walter B.M. Posthistoricism // Transition. 1996. № 70. P. 4-19.
- Хантингтон С. Столкновение цивилизаций. М.: АСТ, 2003. 603 с.
- Zakaria F. The End of the End of History // Newsweek. 2001. 24 September.
- Fukuyama F. The West has won: Radical Islam can't beat democracy and capitalism. We’re still at the end of history // The Guardian. 2001. 11 October.
- Leonard M. What does China think? N. Y., 2008. 176 p.
- Фукуяма Ф. Конец истории и последний человек. М.: АСТ, 2005. 588 с.
- Ницше Ф. Так говорил Заратустра. Минск, 1997. 623 с.
- Уэльбек М. Покорность. М.: АСТ, 2016. 352 с.
- Palahniuk C. Fight Club: A Novel. N. Y., 2005. 224 p.
- Гегель Г.В. Философия права. М.: Мысль, 1990. 524 с.
- Hahlweg К. The Future of History // Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory. 1996. № 88. P. 128-143.
- May R.J. Revisiting Fukuyama: On the Struggle for Recognition, Aggression, and Territorial Imperatives from the Beginning of History to the End of Time // World Affairs. 1996. Vol. 158. № 4. P. 193-197.
- Rethinking Globalism / ed. by B.M. Steger. N. Y., 2004. 288 p.
- Фукуяма Ф. Наше постчеловеческое будущее: Последствия биотехнологической революции. М., 2004. 349 с.
- Казеннов Д.К. Биоэтические суждения о генной инженерии // Известия Саратовского университета. Сер.: Философия. Психология. Педагогика. 2011. Т. 11. № 2. С. 32-35.
- Акулова И.С. «Конец истории» как значимый элемент философского мировоззрения // Вестник Читинского государственного университета. 2008. № 2 (47). С. 65-69.
- Черникова И.В., Шеренкова В.В. Проблема сохранения природы человека как новый аспект кризиса идентичности // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2015. № 4 (32). С. 222-229.
- Hawking S. Brief Answers to the Big Questions. N. Y.: Bantam Books, 2018. 256 p.
Supplementary files

