Universal adhesive systems in dentistry: A narrative review
- 作者: Razumova S.N.1, Brago A.S.1, Ruda O.R.1, Guryeva Z.A.1, Adzhieva E.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- Peoples Friendship University
- 期: 卷 28, 编号 5 (2024)
- 页面: 512-521
- 栏目: Reviews
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/1728-2802/article/view/313564
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/dent439601
- ID: 313564
如何引用文章
详细
Background: Various innovative solutions are being adopted in dentistry to reduce the risk of treatment-related complications. Latest-generation adhesive systems are important for preventing microleakages and improving the adhesion of filling materials to tooth structures, resulting in effective use of esthetic restoration materials and long-lasting restorations.
Aim: To assess the current use of universal adhesive systems.
Materials and methods: The literature search was performed using PubMed, eLIBRARY.RU, and Google Scholar. The following search terms were used: “universal adhesive systems”, “universal adhesives”, “dentin bonding agents”, “dental debonding” and “dental etching”. The search covered studies published during the last 10 years.
Results: The initial search yielded 1.284 publications. After screening for compliance with search terms, 106 studies were selected. Following a full-text analysis, 31 (100%) publications were included in the review. Of these, 14 (45%) studies addressed adhesive composition (examined component: hydrophilic monomers, nanofillers, hydrophobic monomers, solvents, etchants); 8 (26%) studies addressed adhesive strength of adhesives (air-powder abrasive surface treatment, smear layer characteristics, surface moisture, bonding agent type, testing conditions); and 9 (29%) addressed application method (etching type).
Conclusion: Universal adhesive systems have a wide range of clinical applications (various methods of surface preparation) and clinical scenarios, expanding their potential use. The findings of the literature review describe various applications of universal adhesive systems with various surface preparation techniques, with mixed results. Conflicting literature data highlight the importance of investigating the long-term use of universal adhesives with various clinical settings and protocols.
作者简介
Svetlana Razumova
Peoples Friendship University
Email: razumova-sn@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9533-9204
SPIN 代码: 6771-8507
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowAnzhela Brago
Peoples Friendship University
Email: anzhela_bogdan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8947-4357
SPIN 代码: 2437-8867
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), associated professor
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowOxana Ruda
Peoples Friendship University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: ruda_or@pfur.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9068-4722
SPIN 代码: 7871-6802
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
Zoya Guryeva
Peoples Friendship University
Email: guryeva_za@pfur.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1384-8284
SPIN 代码: 1368-4020
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowElvira Adzhieva
Peoples Friendship University
Email: adzhieva-ev@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2735-4621
SPIN 代码: 5667-4620
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
参考
- Rizzante FAP, Mondelli RFL, Furuse AY, et al. Shrinkage stress and elastic modulus assessment of bulk-fill composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27:e20180132. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0132
- Razumova SN, Gapochkina LL, Bragunova RM, et al. Estimation of antimicrobial additive influence on composite properties. Medical Alphabet. 2017;4(36):24–27. EDN: YNMLZS
- Aslanjan MA, Eremin OV, Trufanova JJ. Application of adhesive systems in dentistry: past and present. Saratov Scientific and Medical Journal. 2018;14(2):234–239. EDN: YBSLZR
- Bragunova RM, Razumova SN, Melkumyan AR, et al. Study of antimicrobial activity of composite materials. Medical Alphabet. 2018;1(2(339)):54–58. EDN: XPLEEX
- Razumova SN, Brago AS, Khaskhanova LM et al. Modern methods of prevention of dental diseases. Medical Alphabet. 2018;3(24(361)):69–70. EDN: VWQGCH
- Bragunova RM, Razumova SN, Volina EG. Adhesive activity of cariesogenic microorganisms to composite material with antibacterial additive. Medical Alphabet. 2018;3(24(361)):26–27. EDN: YPUTBR
- Khaskhanova LM, Razumova SN, Gapochkina LL, et al Comparative characteristics of the strength of adhesive systems of the fifth generation in the modification of the adhesive protocol. Medical Alphabet. 2022;(2):63–66. doi: 10.33667/2078-5631-2022-2-63-66
- Khashanova LM, Razumova SN, Brago AS, et al. Comparative characteristics of physical and mechanical properties of adhesive systems. J Int Dent Med Res. 2022;15(1):27–30.
- Khaskhanova LM, Razumova SN, Serebrov DM, et al. Scanning Electron Microscopy. J Int Dent Med Res. 2022;15(1):107–109.
- Khaskhanova LM, Razumova SN, Brago AS, et al. The effectiveness of the use of fifth-generation adhesive systems if changing the protocol before and after thermal cycling. Medical Alphabet. 2022;(7):55–59. doi: 10.33667/2078-5631-2022-7-55-59
- Khaskhanova LM, Razumova SN, Brago AS, et al. The effectiveness of the use of fifth-generation adhesive systems if changing the protocol before and after thermal cycling. Medical Alphabet. 2022;(7):63–67. doi: 10.33667/2078-5631-2022-7-55-59
- Bakry AS, Abbassy MA. Application modes affect two universal adhesive systems’ nanoleakage expression and shear bond strength. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:7375779. doi: 10.1155/2021/7375779
- Hass V, Cardenas A, Siqueira F, et al. Bonding performance of universal adhesive systems applied in etch-and-rinse and self-etch strategies on natural dentin caries. Oper Dent. 2019;44(5):510–520. doi: 10.2341/17-252-L
- Loguercio AD, de Paula EA, Hass V, et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 36-month randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Dentistry. 2015;43(9):1083–1092. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.005
- Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, et al. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. Journal of Dentistry. 2013;41(5):404–411. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001
- Munoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, et al. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Operative Dentistry. 2015;40(3):282–292. doi: 10.2341/14-055-L
- Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez I, Munoz MA, et al. Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesives. Dental Materials. 2015;31(10):e236–e246. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.002
- Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigão J. Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019;107(6):2121–2131. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34305
- Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubilità and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials. 2003;24:655–665. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00380-0
- Karami Nogourani M, Javadi Nejad Sh, Homayunzadeh M. Sealant Microleakage in Saliva-Contaminated Enamel: Comparison between three adhesive systems. J Dent Sch. 2010;27(4):197–204.
- Nair M, Paul J, Kumar S. Comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of sixth and seventh generation bonding agents: An In-Vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(1):27–30. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.124119
- Başaran G, Ozer T, Devecioğlu Kama J. Comparison of a recently developed nanofiller self-etching primer adhesive with other self-etching primers and conventional acid etching. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31(3):271–275. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn103
- Kasraei SH, Atai M, Khamverdi Z, Khalegh Nejad S. Effect of nanofiller addition to an experimental dentin adhesive on microtensile bond strength to human dentin. J Dent (Tehran) 2009;6(2):91–96.
- Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, et al. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017;8(1):1–17. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001
- Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, Peumans M, et al. The role of HEMA in one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2008;24(10):1412–1419. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.018
- Tsujimoto A, Fischer NG, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. Bond Durability of Two-Step HEMA-Free Universal Adhesive. J Funct Biomater. 2022;13(3):134. doi: 10.3390/jfb13030134
- Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, et al. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent. 2015;40(3):282–292. doi: 10.2341/14-055-L
- Wang R, Shi Y, Li T, et al. Adhesive interfacial characteristics and the related bonding performance of four self-etching adhesives with different functional monomers applied to dentin. J Dent. 2017;62:72–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.010
- Blum IR, Martos R, Szalóki M, et al. Effects of different surface treatments and adhesive self-etch functional monomers on the repair of bulk fill composites: A randomised controlled study. J Dent. 2021;108:103637. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103637
- Pimentel de Oliveira R, de Paula BL, Ribeiro ME, et al. Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10-MDP Monomers: Bond Strength of Adhesives Containing HEMA and 10-MD. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:5756649. doi: 10.1155/2022/5756649
- Siqueira F, Cardenas AM, Gutierrez MF, et al. Laboratory Performance of Universal Adhesive Systems for Luting CAD/CAM Restorative Materials. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(4):331–40. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a36519
- Nair M, Paul J, Kumar S, et al. Comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of sixth and seventh generation bonding agents: An In-Vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(1):27–30. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.124119
- Dos Santos RA, de Lima EA, Mendonça LS, et al. Can universal adhesive systems bond to zirconia? J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(6):589–594. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12521
- Saikaew P, Chowdhury AF, Fukuyama M, et al. The effect of dentine surface preparation and reduced application time of adhesive on bonding strength. J Dent. 2016;47:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.02.001
- Tamura Y, Takamizawa T, Shimamura Y, et al. Influence of air-powder polishing on bond strength and surface-free energy of universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater J. 2017;36(6):762–769. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-185
- Siriporananon C, Senawongse P, Sattabanasuk V, et al. Effects of dentin surface preparations on bonding of self-etching adhesives under simulated pulpal pressure. Restor Dent Endod. 2021;47(1):e4. doi: 10.5395/rde.2022.47.e4
- Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles? J Dent. 2015;43(5):525–536. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004
- Follak AC, Miotti LL, Lenzi TL, et al. Self-etch approach of universal adhesives as an alternative to minimize bond degradation on sound dentin vs caries-affected dentin over time. J Adhes Dent. 2021;23(3):243–252. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b1367889
- Burrer P, Dang H, Par M, et al. Effect of over-etching and prolonged application time of a universal adhesive on dentin bond strength. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(12):2902. doi: 10.3390/polym12122902
- Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2012;40(6):475–484. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012
- Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, et al. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2016;32(2):e9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.005
- Yamauchi K, Tsujimoto A, Jurado CA, et al. Etch-and-rinse vs self-etch mode for dentin bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives. J Oral Sci. 2019;61(4):549–553. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.18-0433
- Jacker-Guhr S, Sander J, Luehrs AK. How “Universal” is Adhesion? Shear Bond Strength of Multi-mode Adhesives to Enamel and Dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(1):87–95. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a41974
- Saito T, Takamizawa T, Ishii R. Influence of application time on dentin bond performance in different etching modes of universal adhesives. Oper Dent. 2020;45(2):183–195. doi: 10.2341/19-028-L
- Cardoso GC, Nakanishi L, Isolan CP, et al. Bond stability of universal adhesives applied to dentin using etch-and-rinse or self-etch strategies. Braz Dent J. 2019;30(5):467–475. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201902578
- Kawazu M, Takamizawa T, Hirokane E, et al. Comparison of dentin bond durability of a universal adhesive and two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(8):2889–2897. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03153-y
- Ranjitha GR, Vikram R, Meena N, et al. Clinical efficacy of universal adhesives for the restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: A randomized clinical trial. J Conserv Dent. 2020;23(3):227–232. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_51_20
- Maciel Pires P, Dávila-Sánchez A, Faus-Matoses V, et al. Bonding performance and ultramorphology of the resin-dentine interface of contemporary universal adhesives. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(6):4391–4405. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04402-3
补充文件
